oh maybe he's doing a "see none of you are answering with a concise answer either because the question is ridiculous" thing, i'll give him the benefit of the doubt
hey no one here's gonna seriously act like dogwarts is some deep thought experiment, the tweet is posed like it has something to say in the trans discourse
and dogwarts is unironically more thought provoking than that tweet
Sorry Ed, but that was a pretty mean sounding response even if it wasn't intentional.
me: "Could I slap you if it meant saving my life in a hypothetical scenario?"
you: "Absolutely, in that kind of situation I would go through that and more to help you out!"
me: "Okay watch this"
*he slaps you*
you: (ouch... man... what the fuck, i was being nice too)
I think it's because he later in the sentence says 'Should you?'
I suspect he's trying to not bias the question (if you 'had' to, then the answer by extension has to be yes), but it does result in the wording being strange.
The more I think about it, the word 'could' might also imply that there are other ways to stop the nuclear apocalypse. Maybe saying 'yes' is the choice that gives you the ending slide where Ron Pearlman calls you a transphobe.
i’d post the photos but i’m on my phone rn. i saw this whole thing on twitter so i asked chatgpt if they’d say the n word to prevent nuclear war and it emphasized how much it is impossible for them to say words they were programmed not to say, and then i asked them what NWA stands for
It doesn't even specify whether the person has to be trans.
New test, you can avoid the nuclear Apocalypse if you call every black person in the world the N word, do you do it.
"would you bang a magic dog to avoid misgendering the nuclear apocalypse? If so what breed? And how much?" The real hypothetical that matters.
Imagine a magical room, like Hogwarts...
"What's the least amount of nuclear damage you'd prevent for each banging of said dog"
He then precedes to bang the dog!
this is why x giving out money for engagement will be the fall of the human species
Should you say you the N word to prevent a nuclear bomb? Yes you should Sure thing my
Dropping the N Word to stop the N Bomb. Truly fighting fire with fire.
??? the fuck is that hypothetical? middle school recess tier question
It's become a meme because several AI chatbots said that they wouldn't say a slur even if it meant preventing a nuclear apocalypse
oh maybe he's doing a "see none of you are answering with a concise answer either because the question is ridiculous" thing, i'll give him the benefit of the doubt
This is the Dogwarts community you're posting in man you know what they say about stones and glass houses
hey no one here's gonna seriously act like dogwarts is some deep thought experiment, the tweet is posed like it has something to say in the trans discourse and dogwarts is unironically more thought provoking than that tweet
I guess it's like the opposite of a purity test, but it's cringe
Well... He misgendered her so I guess we avoided an apocalypse. You should be more grateful.
I read this as making fun of all the people who post themselves asking ChatGPT this question
The one Musk was jerking off to when he asked various AIs months ago.
Ed reply to Caitlyn is wild. It made me laugh out loud What a goofball. Dude is so regarded he doesn't grasp deadnaming vs misgendering.
To be fair to Ed, Caitlin *did* answer with Bruce
Tbf Ed was only supposed to do that to prevent a nuclear attack.
Maybe he did? Hard to prove a negative 😅
Its true, I was the Iraqi who had WMDs. The only reason the US couldn't find them is because Ed deadnamed me on that fateful day in 2003
I didn't catch that. My bad on Ed. Caitlyn is regarded as hell lmfao.
Isn't dead-naming a subcategory of misgendering?
Deadnaming is a type of misgendering...
Ed doesn't have the balls to do the same thing with the n-word.
Given that he answered by deadnaming her, does that mean that we were just saved from a nuclear apocalypse and we don't even know it?
[Hero or Hate Crime](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDgjPD3WX7k)
Sorry Ed, but that was a pretty mean sounding response even if it wasn't intentional. me: "Could I slap you if it meant saving my life in a hypothetical scenario?" you: "Absolutely, in that kind of situation I would go through that and more to help you out!" me: "Okay watch this" *he slaps you* you: (ouch... man... what the fuck, i was being nice too)
Shouldn't the phrasing be "If you **HAD** to missgender someone", not "If you **COULD**"?
I think it's because he later in the sentence says 'Should you?' I suspect he's trying to not bias the question (if you 'had' to, then the answer by extension has to be yes), but it does result in the wording being strange. The more I think about it, the word 'could' might also imply that there are other ways to stop the nuclear apocalypse. Maybe saying 'yes' is the choice that gives you the ending slide where Ron Pearlman calls you a transphobe.
i’d post the photos but i’m on my phone rn. i saw this whole thing on twitter so i asked chatgpt if they’d say the n word to prevent nuclear war and it emphasized how much it is impossible for them to say words they were programmed not to say, and then i asked them what NWA stands for
what
It doesn't even specify whether the person has to be trans. New test, you can avoid the nuclear Apocalypse if you call every black person in the world the N word, do you do it.
The one man to get away with calling her Bruce. The Man (@edkrassen), The Myth, The Legend.