Yeah, I first heard this guy on Joe Rogan talking about how he tried to save Kanye from himself, ask for more liquor and start rambling about how Jewish people offer so much more to societies. It was weird because he sounded so interesting at the start of the interview and then he just started getting weirder and weirder, and more main-charactery.
He isn't dumb, is the nicest thing I wil say about him. He has a good point once or twice. But the rest is such word garbage I stopped giving him a chance. He's the worst kind of thing -- a person with a platform who likes to hear himself talk TOO MUCH with far too little to say. So he is annoying. He reminds me of me at my worst. And I wouldn't go on a show sounding like he does because I would feel guilty forcing people to have to listen to my crap. He needs to learn the value of self-editing and concise phrasing with a point.
Yeah, his hour and a half ramble about quantum mechanics was nonsensical. Joe kept trying to get him back on track by saying he doesn't understand what he's on about but I'm not even sure eric knew what he was on about. Then didn't he "reveal" his website as a gift to Joe or something?! 🤢
Cannot deal with this useless grifter so unless there is something truly interesting (as in novel, not known before, and possible insight into the man) I hardly think this guy is gonna be the one who knows shit.
I find Eric to be pretty annoying, but his story is interesting and I think his analysis of who Epstein was is spot on. No other explanation makes any sense to me.
man what insight to bear this late in the game. lol Eric wants to pat himself on the back for allegedly knowing Epstein was a fraud from the start. Ok, and after the major exposes on Epstein now you’re going to act like you were on to him? Also bore no new information at all. this is such an Eric move.
You guys are hating like crazy, he met him in New York and is one of the few science related people that isn’t tight lipped about his connections. This is a great source of information.
Don't know anything about who Eric Weinstein is, but his idea about who "Jeffrey Epstein" was, seems very interesting. The real Epstein story may or may not come out in fifty years, if redacted and confidential documents are ever released, or it may be lost to history. Nevertheless, there is way more to Epstein than anyone currently knows.
Yeah, I first heard this guy on Joe Rogan talking about how he tried to save Kanye from himself, ask for more liquor and start rambling about how Jewish people offer so much more to societies. It was weird because he sounded so interesting at the start of the interview and then he just started getting weirder and weirder, and more main-charactery.
He isn't dumb, is the nicest thing I wil say about him. He has a good point once or twice. But the rest is such word garbage I stopped giving him a chance. He's the worst kind of thing -- a person with a platform who likes to hear himself talk TOO MUCH with far too little to say. So he is annoying. He reminds me of me at my worst. And I wouldn't go on a show sounding like he does because I would feel guilty forcing people to have to listen to my crap. He needs to learn the value of self-editing and concise phrasing with a point.
Yeah, his hour and a half ramble about quantum mechanics was nonsensical. Joe kept trying to get him back on track by saying he doesn't understand what he's on about but I'm not even sure eric knew what he was on about. Then didn't he "reveal" his website as a gift to Joe or something?! 🤢
Sorry I can't stand Eric. He takes the longest time to string together a bunch of words, all while saying nothing.
THANK U THIS IS EXACTLY HOW I FEEL TOO
Cannot deal with this useless grifter so unless there is something truly interesting (as in novel, not known before, and possible insight into the man) I hardly think this guy is gonna be the one who knows shit.
I feel like this story is getting more dramatic the more he tells it
I find Eric to be pretty annoying, but his story is interesting and I think his analysis of who Epstein was is spot on. No other explanation makes any sense to me.
man what insight to bear this late in the game. lol Eric wants to pat himself on the back for allegedly knowing Epstein was a fraud from the start. Ok, and after the major exposes on Epstein now you’re going to act like you were on to him? Also bore no new information at all. this is such an Eric move.
I never believed this story.
From one stein to another.
You guys are hating like crazy, he met him in New York and is one of the few science related people that isn’t tight lipped about his connections. This is a great source of information.
It’s all a word salad with Eric
Don't know anything about who Eric Weinstein is, but his idea about who "Jeffrey Epstein" was, seems very interesting. The real Epstein story may or may not come out in fifty years, if redacted and confidential documents are ever released, or it may be lost to history. Nevertheless, there is way more to Epstein than anyone currently knows.
Out of all of it, I gleaned that “Epstein was a construct” which in context to the rest of his story, made perfect sense.