T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

[удалено]


whenthefirescame

Here’s an example of what you’re talking about: I once worked in a school district with two administrators who were friends. One (admin a) was not from the US and grew up going to night clubs and such in her country, apparently she met her adult husband that way when she was a teenager (15 years old). He’s rich, they’ve been together decades now, she’s (outwardly) very happy. I think it’s messed up, but not something I’m going to say anything about. What bothered me though was that I learned all this from admin b, who saw absolutely nothing wrong with any of it. She said her friend was mature, things were different then/there, just a lot of common excuses. Both of these women were highly educated, specialists in working with young people and in leadership positions in schools full of young girls. I worked directly with teen girls at the time and I was SO HORRIFIED that women in their position had that attitude. But to them it was normal, just the way they grew up, I guess.


kodamacrossing

I’ve noticed this in my own family. My feminist mom was either 17 or 18 when she started dating my father who was 9 years older than her and possibly knew her for years beforehand. They were very happy and my dad treated my mom well but the older I get the more I realize how fucking weird it is.


Fine-Tank9849

Can we stop posting her?


WalterBlytheFanClub

Seconded.


Bl1nk1nUR4r34

PLEASE


areallyreallycoolhat

You know for most this would be a new low but for Azealia it's just a new middle


RiotGrrr1

I mean did we expect her not to be messy and not have a terrible take?


InviteNecessary1032

The age of consent argument makes me want to jump out a window because it’s always used as a dumbass gotcha moment like yes congratulations you are technically legally correct and as we all know legally and morally are always the same and never diverge…. 🫠 but now we know you or those you support are still interested in teenagers. So what now?


krasmazovonfire

Anyone mentions age of consent I’m side eyeing I saw a video of Stephen Fry give a talk about it at a university, questioning it and I’ve disliked him ever since. Very creepy


Icy-Trust-6274

She doesn't want to talk about how he starts talking to these girls before they're over that age line though. I wonder why.


_Democracy_

And we all know the reason why the AOC is so low in different states and countries too. A lot of politicians are pedophiles. It’s why they try to keep lowering it and the marriage ages to!


sammarsmce

https://i.redd.it/syn6491t950d1.gif


DigLost5791

Honestly I like to think she’s using her status as “known maniac” to help all good people go against Drake by siding with him. Masterful plan


meatbeater558

Tom Macdonald did the same thing. Masterful gambit! 


EconomistWild7158

No one: Literally no one: Not even the Pulitzer Prize people: Azealia Banks: "you are disrespecting the institute of the Pulitzer Prize"


roxy031

“Pulitzer Price”. She is such a dumbass.


Financial-Painter689

Honestly? This is just mid. Come on now we know you can be a better troll Azealia


Fine-Tank9849

Idk, her arguing that 17 is an appropriate age to entertain a grown ass man… is bad.


Financial-Painter689

Good point. I guess I just miss the days of her playing with witchcraft etc


krasmazovonfire

For the sake of the animals; I do not.


TheIncredibleBucket

She embodies loser behavior in unprecedented ways. Azealia Banks speaks her mind for the losers out there


crystal_clear24

https://preview.redd.it/5q3lkj5gv60d1.jpeg?width=264&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4b0c3b1994b35b0af3a5a3eefc175bc793b7f7ce What in the world


CelibateHo

Flair checks out


HazelTheHappyHippo

Aside from the whole bullshit she's spewing: Azeliabanksforever is her instahandle?? Well, they say you should be your own biggest fan


ferozliciosa

She’s running out of usernames cause her accounts keep getting banned (not joking)


seahorse8021

Me when someone has the username I really want but I can’t afford to buy it off them


colomboseye

Stop posting her. Don’t give her the platform. Shes an awful person that must insert herself into every narrative


shades0fcool

Fun game: Google your birthday and “azealia banks” and you’ll find what she said and who she came after on your birthday! Have fun!


JayZsAdoptedSon

For me I think it was one of her getting banned from a country. Wanna keep it vague but its genuinely hilarious


meatbeater558

I like Banks with the melodies, I don't like Banks when she act tough 🤷‍♀️


mama_meta

Everytime she crawls out of her hidey hole I just wanna scream "OMGGIRLSHUTTHEFUCKUP" 😐


Viva912

Im not reading all that


Bubble_Tea35

This is disgraceful and disgusting. I shouldn’t be surprised


mitrafunfun97

She not like us.


MundaneYet

She continues to be whatever 👎🏾. Anyway. While it’s brought up, just in general, It’s so annoying when people don’t acknowledge the *FACT* that males who go for the “””legal age””” or talk about it as a defence /are only concerned with/even just mention tbh, the ~legalities of this shit are openly telling you that they would go as young as possible if they couldn’t get into legal trouble for it. As young as possible. That’s what these men are, like…you’re fucking dumb and simply bamboozled if you don’t know that, sorry lol.


Aggressive-Story3671

Legally Drake isn’t doing anything wrong. MORALLY he is. That’s the issue.


Comfortable-Load-904

Could we please as a society ignore Azealia, the woman is attention driven and if we stop paying attention and caring about her nonsense she would go away. Also that is a very dangerous rhetoric she seems to be championing, a lot of the men in that industry are already predatory to teenagers let’s not be complicit by telling them the age of consent is 17 so that’s fine. Teenagers are not adults and shouldn’t be encouraged to get into relationships with fully grown men. I hope we get to a day where she is not posted anywhere online and she fades into the ether.


RaggySparra

Honestly, I'm just surprised it's not homophobic, that's where I usually assume it's going with her. (Yes, I know she's bisexual. Doesn't change how often she uses homophobia against men she's mad at.)


CelibateHo

She can’t sit with us.


DaftPrettyLies

She’s such a chronically online loser. People praise her going after random celebs 25/8 but I feel bad for her at the end of the day


Uplanapepsihole

i’m glad other people are getting tired. i’ve been tired of her takes for years now and always felt frustrated when people would say “she’s problematic but she’s so funny” she’s been a caricature of herself for a good while now and i feel people have been encouraging it


aintnothin_in_gatlin

She is about to get blasted by Kendrick Lamar.


caprising1996

no one of note responds to that nutjob anymore


JayZsAdoptedSon

She was also acting super shady with Doechii, who was showing her love. While Kendrick was leaving TDE as Doechii came in, this beef shows Kendrick has MASSIVE respect for Top Dawg, even if he is no longer signed to him


MarzipanJoy-Joy

I've never thought anyone needs a lobotomy, but I might be changing my mind...


[deleted]

[удалено]


bouncybreadstick

Kendrick did not “advocate to free r.kelly”, can we please fact check before saying stuff like this?


meatbeater558

He didn't say anything about R Kelly either. The boss of his label thought a new Spotify policy was going to create a racist slippery slope and threatened them to get them to stop using it. Every news outlet at the time reported it as "Kendrick's label" which eventually got shortened to Kendrick, despite the fact that he didn't actually say or do anything. 


JayZsAdoptedSon

And tbf, I kiiiiinda agree. Its weird to go after ONLY after black artists and ignore allllll the bands of the 70s-2000s. It may be unpopular but you gotta look at people like John Lennon, Mick Jagger, David Bowie etc. they may be icons and have influenced millions but its either all or nothing


meatbeater558

This was before Surviving R. Kelly, his infamous interview, and his 2019 arrest. Now the man has always been awful I'm just pointing this out because people seem to imply that Kendrick's label (which was then shortened to just Kendrick) supported the R. Kelly we know today and not the R. Kelly the public knew back then.  And yeah, their policy was basically to remove artists on a case by case basis as problematic behavior came to their attention. Which is just a stupid idea. They could periodically do a background check on every artist they send money to if they wanted. Instead they chose to drop (black) artists when it's convenient?


seahorse8021

You can get on Kendrick for Kodak and Future, but he most definitely was not saying free R Kelly what 💀