Your right, he has only done it with thousands of other protocols over the past 30 years and is the founder and CEO of OMG who is currently 4/17 months into their implementation of IOTA as a standard....š§
Initially you said it was just a quote and not a fact. Then you learned Richard Soley is the one who made this statement. To that you responded āJust because Richard Soley wants it to be true, doesnāt mean it is.ā Then I informed you on who Richard Soley is and why his opinions carry so much weight in the space of standardization. Now youāre saying that āno oneā seems to have a clue in what way IOTA would be standardized. The title of the very article your commenting on explains that. Also a superficial google search of IOTA would render you the industry verticals they are actively working with to create standards across each vertical (Supply Chain, Mobility, Finance, eHealth, Infrustructure, etc). Being a standard in the IOT software and hardware layers is at the foundation of being a standard across these industry verticals. Iām generally curious have you done any research and if so what are you trying to say here?
At least I am capable of reading user names, so there's that.
Also no idea why I am getting downvoted since it is an honest question that has been asked before, and no one has answered before. It is like saying you are gonna standardize a chair. Okay, but in what way? Especially since large parts of IOTA are still in development it seems like a fair question to me. But I forgot that I was just supposed to hype it here instead of asking for information, my bad, won't do it again.
Iām the durp for the user names forsure. That said you did not really ask. You stated it as if it was a fact that no one knew. And if youād like to understand then I emplore you to watch each of the Richard Soley interviews and read through each of the OMG slide deck presentations discussing exactly what your asking. Letās talk after that. You can find them posted in the reddit thread history if you care.
Thanks at least for giving a reasonable response instead of the other guy who doesn't get further than: Read everything and watch everything. For me that only reinforced my original question: Does anyone know? If it is clear what exactly is standardized, then how hard can it be to explain it here?
Anyway, your answer is at least more useful, but still leaves me with questions. Lets take the Bluetooth example. If someone would ask me what to standardize in a wireless protocol I could give you at least the broad lines: From carrier frequency/modulation type on the physical layer, to thinks on higher layers like how data frames are built, what to broadcast, different types of services that can be broadcasted, etc. What however is not standardized, is how to implement it. Thats your own job.
So are they gonna standardize really IOTA completely? Or for example just IOTA-like protocols, where you could use it to communicate over IOTA, but it could also be used for any other similar system which would be made in the future. Compare it to MQTT. The message protocol is standardized, but your broker (server) can run on your Raspberry, or be a giganted system running in the Amazon Cloud. And nowhere in the standard a specific implementation of this server exists.
Wouldn't it be nicer to build something along guidelines that industry players want? Rather than developing it all and realizing it's far from usable? I think standardization can somewhat develop alongside the protocol. They don't have to be one after the other.
No doubt! I've got IOTA running in my 2019 BMW Monster car that enables me to talk to the car and get it to drive and park itself.
IOTA is King of IoT protocols.
Iota will be a fundemental part of IOT
This is incredible
end of the sentence: "according to an IOTA Foundation supervisory board member."
This was Richard soley. He is in a leading position at OMG and those sent the tweet. So the circle completes and your objection is untenable
I just say that's a quote and not a fact and that's not because M. Soley wants it, that it will be the case, just be careful.
Your right, he has only done it with thousands of other protocols over the past 30 years and is the founder and CEO of OMG who is currently 4/17 months into their implementation of IOTA as a standard....š§
However no one seems to have a clue in what way IOTA would be standardized.
Initially you said it was just a quote and not a fact. Then you learned Richard Soley is the one who made this statement. To that you responded āJust because Richard Soley wants it to be true, doesnāt mean it is.ā Then I informed you on who Richard Soley is and why his opinions carry so much weight in the space of standardization. Now youāre saying that āno oneā seems to have a clue in what way IOTA would be standardized. The title of the very article your commenting on explains that. Also a superficial google search of IOTA would render you the industry verticals they are actively working with to create standards across each vertical (Supply Chain, Mobility, Finance, eHealth, Infrustructure, etc). Being a standard in the IOT software and hardware layers is at the foundation of being a standard across these industry verticals. Iām generally curious have you done any research and if so what are you trying to say here?
>Initially you said it was just a quote and not a fact. Different accounts. Look at the usernames.
At least I am capable of reading user names, so there's that. Also no idea why I am getting downvoted since it is an honest question that has been asked before, and no one has answered before. It is like saying you are gonna standardize a chair. Okay, but in what way? Especially since large parts of IOTA are still in development it seems like a fair question to me. But I forgot that I was just supposed to hype it here instead of asking for information, my bad, won't do it again.
Iām the durp for the user names forsure. That said you did not really ask. You stated it as if it was a fact that no one knew. And if youād like to understand then I emplore you to watch each of the Richard Soley interviews and read through each of the OMG slide deck presentations discussing exactly what your asking. Letās talk after that. You can find them posted in the reddit thread history if you care.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Thanks at least for giving a reasonable response instead of the other guy who doesn't get further than: Read everything and watch everything. For me that only reinforced my original question: Does anyone know? If it is clear what exactly is standardized, then how hard can it be to explain it here? Anyway, your answer is at least more useful, but still leaves me with questions. Lets take the Bluetooth example. If someone would ask me what to standardize in a wireless protocol I could give you at least the broad lines: From carrier frequency/modulation type on the physical layer, to thinks on higher layers like how data frames are built, what to broadcast, different types of services that can be broadcasted, etc. What however is not standardized, is how to implement it. Thats your own job. So are they gonna standardize really IOTA completely? Or for example just IOTA-like protocols, where you could use it to communicate over IOTA, but it could also be used for any other similar system which would be made in the future. Compare it to MQTT. The message protocol is standardized, but your broker (server) can run on your Raspberry, or be a giganted system running in the Amazon Cloud. And nowhere in the standard a specific implementation of this server exists.
Wouldn't it be nicer to build something along guidelines that industry players want? Rather than developing it all and realizing it's far from usable? I think standardization can somewhat develop alongside the protocol. They don't have to be one after the other.
No doubt! I've got IOTA running in my 2019 BMW Monster car that enables me to talk to the car and get it to drive and park itself. IOTA is King of IoT protocols.