T O P

  • By -

clogeta

We drafting one of Manu's kids.


TonyDude885

Rob Dillingham is not the make or break for this team šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚


seceipseseer

I agree with everything about this post and your comment. But I did let out a scream/squeal when I heard Robs name, would have been really fun.


TonyDude885

It would've been nice to have him but it's funny to watch the breakdowns from people who get weirdly attached to these short guards who only score


seceipseseer

Everyone would have roasted him if in the finals he became unplayable, because thatā€™s inevitable. In the regular season though, Rob & Wemby would have been electric.


Master-Ad-9829

Castle will be unplayable when they leave him and Sochan wide open good luck


Joethetoolguy

Sigh, hopefully we do something other than run malaki traffic cone branham out for another tank season


toomuchsoysauce

I mean almost every analyst points to the fact that Castle has solid form and mechanics so improving his shot significantly is not a tall ask for him. Not to mention he is a good finisher and can take a beating down low when he drives unlike Dillingham.


Not-Yellow

Castle is a significantly better shooter than stats implied, and Iā€™m going to go on a whim and say you donā€™t pay attention to much college ball. Castle brings defense, playmaking, high IQ, and extremely coachable. Not only that, but he can shoot. He suffered a knee injury in the first few weeks on UConn, and it wasnā€™t until later down the season that his efficiency got better. Iā€™m bias, as Iā€™m a UConn fan, and Iā€™ll openly state that, but his form is natural looking. unlike sochan.


baulboodban

castleā€™s FT shooting went from awful 60-something% after the injury to a hell of a lot closer to 90% in that final stretch, with his work ethic the improvement potential is obvious


Purple_Apartment

And they will still be better than the pistons what is your point


Conscious_String_195

I mean, TP, was a short king, who was also super skinny w/not much of a shot, great defender or great passing ability at 18. Not saying that he ll be TP, but he has many similar skills at his age and a better shot. Nobody thought TP would be a HOF er at the time either.


ObiWanGinobili20

Thatā€™s insulting to TP, he was never a liability on defense and was quite great at getting steals.


Conscious_String_195

I loved Tony, but you must not have been around for the beginning or end of his career then. Getting steals alone, does not make you a good defender, but he only averaged .8 a game anyway.


ObiWanGinobili20

Been watching religiously since 03. Iā€™m not saying he was elite, but itā€™s false to say he was anything below average imo. Iā€™d have to look the up the defensive efficiencyā€™s with him vs without him on floor but I never thought of him as a bad defender while watching him since he was a 20 year old kid.


Notapplesauce11

TP also played before defenses had to switch constantly.


Conscious_String_195

Yes, but Tony was a rookie in 2001-2002, and I also watched or taped every game off the satellite dish. (Since those Willie Anderson, Sean Elliott, Rod Strickland, David and Terry Cummings days when we got bounced by the Blazers in the playoffs šŸ˜ž) Anyway, I digress. He was often the target of many of Popā€™s rants in his first few seasons for his lack of strength at point of attack (he was very skinny and weak but was 18 in 01) lack of defensive awareness and not switching in the right situations was common. He was never a plus defender and because of his lack of size, often got bodied up or posted up by taller guards requiring doubles to come over. (It wouldnā€™t be a problem anymore as you donā€™t have any like Gary Payton, Sprewell, Mitch Richmond, etc. that would post up.) He didnā€™t have especially long arms to get in the passing lane and get a lot of deflections, etc. It just wasnā€™t his game, and he had a top 3 greatest defensive big in modern history playing behind him and Bruce Bowen to guard the other teams best G or SF and then Kawhi. My point was not to denigrate TP, because he was an underrated PG in the league that never really got his flowers (partly because he played in SA, partly because he had a Top 5 player playing behind him and Pop, an all time great coach and Manu s flashiness and craft and style of play had people drawing attention away from Tony.) I remember when I was praying to the NBA Gods that something happened when the Spurs were looking to bring in Jason Kidd and trade Tony (I dislike Kidd). It wasnā€™t because they didnā€™t think he could get to the rim, or run a 1 man fast break, or hit the most beautiful year drop that could almost make you shed one (which I donā€™t see done as consistently and stylishly anymore). Part of those discussions were about ability to lead and whether Parker could and other part was about his defense compared to bringing in Kidd. I think if you turned on a few of those games from his rookie year until about his 3rd or 4th year, you will see him running to wrong shooters, canā€™t get over screens easily and letting his man past and hoping TD cleaned it up. I d say that he was league average or so in middle of his career acc to StatMuse Defensive Rating and then he was bad in his last 4 years, but no prime TD behind him, slowed a bit, and his age. It happens. In this case, we would only be talking about where TP was in his rookie year or 2 vs Dillingham. If you get the chance on YouTube or whatever, itā€™s fun and nostalgic to see a game from say back then or maybe playoff game from the 90ā€™s just to really see David Robinson in his prime. You will start to notice things differently of a player because you know the game much better now and B) itā€™s changed so much to a very different style.


RCA2CE

I donā€™t think anyone is weirdly attached to Dillingham - your comment ignores that there were many other choices available at #8 The discontent is that we punted the ball to save salary yet again. There isnā€™t a larger plan to have trade assets, we have just as many assets as we had yesterday and there wasnā€™t a trade. Brian Wright cannot get a deal done. He is a small market brain trapped in a city that wants a ring. When someone asked what was your worst case draft scenario- this exceeded it. This was our lowest moment.


josephandre

yeah i donā€™t care about dillingham or claim to know more than the FO, it was just a deflating and hard to understand left field move. If anyone had proposed earlier that instead of drafting at 8 we traded it for a pick in 7 years theyā€™d have been downvoted into oblivion


RCA2CE

Exactly- they should have traded that pick before the draft if they didnā€™t like anyone. Instead they decided to save some payroll money and give away a lottery pick You know there draft board was like Risacher, Castle, Sarr, Salaun, Clingan and once they were gone we went scrambling to dump the salary connected to the lottery pick. It was absolutely ridiculous to give away a lottery pick. Iā€™m saying it now- this is an ALL TIME spurs bad draft move. Worse than Samanic, Primo, Lonnie - a historic miss. A year from now every pick that was on the board at 8 who is looking promising is going to be salt in an open wound


iamtvi

šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚ The Spurs wanted to keep the pick if SalaĆ¼n was still available, which is why they didnā€™t trade it early. Trading the #8 pick was Plan B if he was off the table at that point, and it was a decent plan B. It saves cap space and they got two 1st round picks for a time when Minnesota will, in all likelihood, be a mediocre team, with only Ant-Man as their lone all-star at that point. Once the Spurs start winning, low picks will be impossible to come by, and the Spurs build through the draft. They donā€™t have the luxury of being L.A, N.Y, or Boston. Ring chasing vets will come, but the core will always be developed through the draft.


RCA2CE

I think youā€™re right about them wanting to see who was available at 8 Not sure that was the best executed plan considering the dogshit we got for a lottery pick. A team with as little talent as we have couldnā€™t find available talent at #8, thatā€™s just hard to imagine. We will be talking about the all stars we passed on for a LONG time


PressureMiserable

I don't really get why, to me he just is a smaller version of malaki except at least malaki has some defensive tools to bank on in the future rob is 6'1 160 besides Trae young every other guy who's come into the league within the past 20 years and been that small has been almost immediately sent to the g league. At best he's Terry Rozier but worse defensively, Lou Will but less talented in the end not a winning player


seceipseseer

Not even close. Malaki was never a 3 point shooter. Rob is top 3 shooter in the class. Rob has one of the quickest first steps and most dynamic handle in his class. Malaki was alright at everything and above average midrange.


PressureMiserable

Malaki shot near 50% from the field in college and was freshman of his conference the first since dlo and averaged 14 and 2. Those aren't too far off of Dillingham's stats I couldn't find the 3pt% on his college profile oddly not even his makes or attempts but remember coming in he was pretty capable and was looked at very highly since he shot nearly 84% from the ft line. Dillingham was really only much better from 3 and a lot of that can be attributed to having extremely talented guys around him like Sheppard who's taking a lot of the shooting attention away


RCA2CE

Ja Morant has a smaller wingspan than Dill


elmanutres

Fucking thank you. Seriously, people here acting as if we traded the rights to luka doncic to the mavs or something. It's a weak ass draft. People aren't even exited for the first pick! I just saw him get picked and I don't even remember his name. Have people in this sub forgotten we had the 4th pick and got a more quality player? Calm down. Getting an unprotected first for when minnesota will eventually minnesota as wemby is in his prime is juicy. Then you guys will be talking about how the spurs FO are such geniuses.


BeautifulDimension56

>Seriously, people here acting as if we traded the rights to luka doncic to the mavs or something. It's funny you say this because this trade genuinely might give us a higher chance of acquiring Doncic then before. Not saying it will ever happen but an Unprotected first round pick + we also have a pickswap with DAL in the same year as the Minny pick swap one.


siphillis

First time in a while I've seen the #1 pick be someone who was basically never mocked as the best prospect


RCA2CE

You miss the point that it isnā€™t about Dillingham- itā€™s about our failure before that pick to get a deal. We donā€™t have more assets today than yesterday. If there was some plan to trade for a veteran it should have gone down before the draft - but it didnā€™t because there isnā€™t one. What youā€™re calling genius is just us being cheap with payroll, this was a payroll move. Being cheap and winning are oil and vinegar.


vfronda

this was not a payroll move. it sounds like you are new here.


RCA2CE

It 100% was a payroll move.


elmanutres

I didn't say it was genius. I was saying that like down the line if Minnesota implodes, all of a sudden that pick (if we still have it) will be juicy and the same people that are so negative about this move do a 180 and call it genius or aomething


notahusky5

The guy is barely 6 foot 1 and 160 lbs. If he is somehow able to survive contact from dudes twice his size, he'll be getting his shots blocked at the rim constantly. He wasn't even the best 3pt shooter in the class too. Add all of that with his historically bad defense, and it's a no from me.


GBAGY2

Okay but like what makes you think a 2030 pick is any better of a chance at being the make or break lol


No_Barnacle9439

Neither is that 2031 pick


ModsEmbezzleMoney

The fact Knecht is still on the board and half this sub was in love with him at 8 is all you need to know about collective opinions


SWBattleleader

I would be pleased if we traded up for him if he falls a bit further. 35 and some future 2nds.


ModsEmbezzleMoney

At this rate we might not have to trade up lol


CoyotesSideEyes

Turns out 23 year old, one-way players aren't good lottery picks


JOYCEISDEAD

i mean people were using this rebuttal about Cam Whitmore last year and then he had a pretty good rookie season in turn.


siphillis

There's concerns about his long-term health IIRC


Sean888888

Funny you should mention Cam Whitmore, I still have zero confidence in Cam Whitmore becoming a star. The Rockets love to hype up their young players to give casual fans the impression that they're better than they really are.


hack5amurai

I got shit on here and told knecht over and over for castle and salaun months ago and we got one and the other didn't make it to 8.


NormalFortune

MASSIVE defensive liability. Rob will be one of the smallest defenders in the league and will be hunted on defense relentlessly, especially in the postseason. Likely not even playable in the postseason, especially a deep playoff run. Everyone freaking out needs to rewatch Boston's offensive sets this playoffs. They isolated and punished bad defenders over and over and fucking over. vs- 2 virtually unprotected picks from a team with some old players, not many draft picks, and a history of getting toxic chemistry and imploding? yes please!


Dru_SA

Most comments here are fully thought out. Apparently weak draft spurs should trade out of turned into GOATing a six foot defensive liability


WoweeZoweeDeluxe

But do you not feel we could have drafted someone else at #8?


NormalFortune

Who was on the board that you wouldā€™ve taken? Salaun and Holland were both gone. Maybe MAYBE Buzelis????


chingalicious

Carter


NormalFortune

Yeah, I guess I could get on board with picking Carter


chingalicious

I'll accept it if we're taking Traore or Flagg with a massive trade up into the 1st overall.


WoweeZoweeDeluxe

Honestly, would've loved Knecht or Carter, but perhaps once the Spurs leverage the Twolves picks in a trade it will be easier to say if we were better off with dillingham/knecht or whhatever the Spurs get in a trade. You'd have to think a trade is in the works.


NormalFortune

Godddd yā€™all are all so shortsighted. Those picks are gonna be MONEY in a few years when weā€™re making deep playoff runs, and the Timberwolves are trash. Whether we use them or trade them it literally doesnā€™t matter. Just imagine if prime Timmy Tony Manu spurs had a couple of top-10 picks. Holy fuck. Think like, how excited you are that we own Atlantaā€™s picks when theyā€™re on the verge of collapseā€¦ but more dramatic.


WoweeZoweeDeluxe

Timberwolves won't be shite in a few years, Edwards is very young. We won't even keep those picks, most likely package them in a trade


NormalFortune

My brotherā€¦ Edwards is the only one who is young and his contract is up in 27/28. The entire rest of the team will be either retired or old by the time these picks, and they are already very skinny on other draft picks to restock with.


WoweeZoweeDeluxe

God willing my friend


NormalFortune

Oh, and also they are in the midst of a big ownership struggle. This all I think bodes well for


WoweeZoweeDeluxe

Very true! Good call buddy


iamtvi

Edwards will be all they have, if he doesnā€™t bolt in FA. Theyā€™ve mortgaged the farm to build this current team, KAT will be 35 and Rudy will be 39. Theyā€™re probably going to suck.


chingalicious

That's the implication when Wright in the post draft interview said he couldn't talk about it. Maybe being coy, but I assume if there wasn't anything planned, he would have said they were "looking to build to the future" or some other vague nonsense instead.


Inner_Emu4716

I was one of the biggest Rob supporters but this is facts. Trading out of a weak draft makes sense. Rob might be really good but there are also a bunch of other ways to get a good point guard (next yearā€™s draft, trade etc). Also, people keep bringing up how the wolves picks might not be good, that is more than likely not our problem. I am almost certain we wonā€™t be using them and will package them in a trade in the future. My guess is the spurs wanna be ready to make a big move next offseason


Dru_SA

People here must not grasp the idea that future draft picks can be used to make deals for other players now or season after.


siphillis

Of course they don't. They think we're scouting 14-year-olds


redditmodsdownvote

yeah, the incredibly valuable minnesota pick lmfao, good to trade down to bottom 8 pick in 6 years from now!


egghead1280

I disagree with you. I, for one, fucking hate Robā€™s game and am super happy we donā€™t have to watch him play zero defense on this team.


hondajvx

Agree completely, I texted my friend when the pick was made and was super pissed. The trade made me happy.


SpecialWhenLitTX

Same, I had to watch one of the ESPN talking heads talk about how much he liked Dilly and casually added, "he just needs to try on defense", and his female co-host about fell out with, "I wish you wouldn't have said that cuz it negates your whole argument" lol. So glad we traded that pick, both Kentucky guards were great on O but way undersized w/o enough dog in them to overcome it, that's a recipe for playoff disaster


A_Curious_Cockroach

As opposed to Tre, Branhim, and Wessley stellar defense.


egghead1280

Wesley is actually not a bad defender, and Tre is not a disaster either. Thereā€™s a big gap between them and Branham, and Iā€™d rather not have two Branhams. In fact, Iā€™d rather not even have one.


22dias

Wesley is still super raw, but he made a huge leap, he went past Branham in the rotation. He's undersized along with Tre. Dillingham and Sheppard and Carter (if they fell to us) will be exploited. With Castle, we've got a legit 6'5 / 6'9 wingspan, who will be guarding the SGA's of the world. He's probably going to grow a bit too, maybe to 6'6'/6'7. Tre / Blake / Castle is fine for where we're at with rebuilding.


egghead1280

I donā€™t think Blake is too undersized, heā€™s 6ā€™4ish with a 6ā€™9 wingspan which is not too bad for a PG which is where I think he ends up. Heā€™s just young and skinny, but I can see him holding up guarding 1-3 once heā€™s had a few years to pack some muscle on.


iNostra

Why add to it then?


Sean888888

Yeah I was baffled when we selected Dillingham. I was so happy when I found out there's a trade.


Tackis

What are the chances that Minnesota's (who has Edwards who will be in his prime) pick will be better than pick 8 in this draft?


armadilloongrits

What are the chances we are still holding on to those assets in 2031?


paxusromanus811

Zero


armadilloongrits

nodding. After what Bridges just garnered they've got to hoard.


paxusromanus811

Well as someone else alluded to, what are the chances that somebody would have imagined? We would get a number one pick in 2023 7 years ago? People would have said no way in hell The NBA is unpredictable


Tackis

Right but a freak accident facilitated the whole nephew thing which led to this. It is unpredictable but Minnesota will try everything in their power to keep him


AboutTime99

Yeah and we tried to be bad. Minn wonā€™t do that if they donā€™t have picks.


PlantSmoker

Bro Minnesota hasnā€™t been trying to be bad for the last 15 years prior to this recent success. They are a historically awful franchise. They can easily fumble this, it happens all the time in the NBA.


AboutTime99

Thats a great point but tanking is so much more accepted now. They do have a better team running it now it seems. Iā€™m sure in 2031 5 teams will be tanking at minimum. Then a few depending on how season goes. Statistically the pick will be btwn 9-30. And thatā€™s ok. I can consider it a lateral move which is fine. I just donā€™t think teams without there picks will be at the bottom (most likely)


CharacterBird2283

I have no proof but I'm 99.99% sure the nephew thing happens no matter what, it always seemed like it was just a convenient excuse


AdamMorrisonRange

Weā€™re betting that a franchise renowned for its ineptitude just keeps being itself. The first playoff series win they had in 2 decades was marred by a foodfight between ownership groups. I like our odds


NormalFortune

pretty good, I would say. 1- This is a pretty weak draft. If those two years are average drafts, then a pick at 15 or better is probably better than a pick 8 in this draft. 2- Edwards might be in his prime, but their other players won't. And they're getting pretty skinny on draft picks in the interim to reload with. 3- They're overpaying for most of their players, limiting their ability to sign a strong FA. 4- Sota has a history of getting chemistry problems and imploding.


siphillis

5- they're in the midst of an ownership dispute which will undoubtedly affect financial stability


christopherfar

Edwards will leave in free agency when his current contract is up in 2029. Heā€™ll go play in a bigger market and leave that team (who will likely already be without KAT and Gobert) in shambles. If the Spurs put together a contender in the next five years and still have those two picks, those picks could be what puts them over the top. I honestly think theyā€™re more likely to keep those two and trade away other picks in the nearer term.


Bonesawisready5

Not likely


bot_lltccp

what are the chances the Spurs could have gotten more for #8 though? I think 100%


SAguilar23

Spurs will have 7 picks in next yearā€™s draft. 4-1st and 3-2nd! And with the 2 Minnesota picks weā€™re up to 36 picks from years 25-31. Jesus!


tycat1901

We're more than likely are only getting our pick and the unprotected hawks pick. Bulls and Hornets are going to be bad again and they are heavily protected picks


Ok-Topic-6095

I agree the Bulls and Hornets will be bad, but I think a lot of teams will be tanking next season.Ā 


DaeHoforlife

The other issue is there just isn't really enough room on the current roster for another guard with Castle, Vassell, Jones, Branham, and Wesley. Don't want to give up on Branham or Wesley yet. Of the remaining wings, there weren't great shooters which is needed.


Apprehensive-Fox-740

Needed 3 seconds to cope. Now I am looking forward to the season. Need to see how castle performs and what Pop drafts up


Skip-Bayless0

I just wish Clingan would've fallen. one. more.Ā  spot.


EchoRespite

People act like the Spurs cant package the first they got from Minny for something sooner.


bot_lltccp

people also act like this is the only trade Spurs could have possibly made


TheBlueOne37

Kentucky fan here. I donā€™t dislike Dillingham but he is way too small and doesnā€™t fit what the Spurs need imo.


Real_Programmer_695

Great trade, I love it.


Conscious_String_195

I think that the problem is that 2030 and 2031 are 7 and 8 seasons away. Itā€™s been 5 years since the playoffs already, and we have an extreme lack of talent on this team now. Itā€™s just hard to be excited about another asset, that is almost a decade away. Itā€™s a good deal that they had to do, but I think most fans would like to see more immediate returns. (It may be part of a trade for something, but it looks like next season will be similar to this one w/not much talent on it still.) šŸ˜ž


Responsible-List-849

Go pick Johnny Furphy tomorrow and let him be your development player with shooting ability...


Izriel

I'd like to yell go Furphy at my TV!


Conscious_String_195

Development player? Thats 3/4 of our roster!


Responsible-List-849

Sorry, might have misread your intent. If you want them to get better more quickly, I'd just assess the trades in terms of assets then. Are the picks you got worth more than the pick/player you sent out? Because either those picks are used in a trade or they are a way to get in cost controlled options when Wemby is expensive and around free agency.


ajswdf

Consider that star players typically win their first title as the bus driver at age 25-27 (including LeBron and Jordan). Wemby will be 25 in 2029. Going into that 2029 season those picks could be very valuable and helpful in trading for that missing piece.


Conscious_String_195

I get it, but itā€™s a half of a decade away before they become valuable. I think that fans are worried what happens if we are not competitive w/Wemby resigning and how the franchise will be with Pop gone, RC maybe gone, etc. I m not saying that it was a bad trade. I just saying that I get how it takes some air out of the room, when itā€™s the same roster next year w/little talent. Plus, unless you are young, 5-7 years puts an old fan (48 year old) like me at 53-55 before they become title contenders.


No_Caramel_1782

Itā€™s smart. Frees you guys up to reload around Wemby in the future. Even better if itā€™s coming off a finals run. Plus I donā€™t think you want to develop another young gun looking to get his. Save it for a guy you really want.


Opusdiddy007

Iā€™ve seen this take only a few times and I absolutely agree with it. This more than likely will not be the last step. The Bridges trade set the market. And market says unprotected 1st round picks is the currency.


Mclitness

Time to go scout early middle school hoops! We gotta be on top of the other teams


holaprobando123

Yeah, you go watch some 12 year olds!


ManusRightHand

Dillingham gonna give Trae Young legit competition for worst starting defender in the whole league (when Conley retires)


siphillis

Young will undoubtedly be better. He's got size and actually knows how to show on a hedge


Nakadash1only

Meh. Trade wasnā€™t ideal but itā€™s too early to judge. Letā€™s see what other moves we do. Offseason isnā€™t over. Love the castle pick tho.


Bonesawisready5

Itā€™s upsetting because we need a lot of help and Imo ANT is 22 I donā€™t see them being a lottery team in his age 29 season. This was Spurs getting too cute with the trades shouldā€™ve just gambled on Buzelis Knecht or anyone


christopherfar

He will be a free agent in 2029. Heā€™ll play in NY, LA, or Miami in the ā€˜29-ā€˜30 season. Thereā€™s a non-zero chance Minnesota is actually awful in 30 and 31. The Spurs spend the next few years slowly building a contender thatā€™s a piece or two short, and these two picks could put them over the top.


Bonesawisready5

Could be lot to gamble on today tho


christopherfar

My gut says we hold these two picks, at least for a few years. Knowing future draft capital is secured allows us to be more aggressive in the trade market with the picks we have in the nearer term.


thelunarunit

That's my one big concern too, prime ant should be scary as hell.


Bonesawisready5

He is a FA ANT that is summer 2029


the_guitargeek_

Minnesota needs to win it all on his current contract, or heā€™s not sticking around in Minnesota. Gobert will be gone. KAT will be a shell of himself. They donā€™t have a lot of picks between now and then. If they donā€™t win on his current contract, heā€™s gone.


Tunechi_Sama

This team needs talent, I agree that this was getting too cute and stockpiling assets. Eventually you have to turn those assets into players. People are also overusing the weak draft tag. It's a flat draft that lacks star power at the top but they are very much more talented players all over this draft than some of the guys on our roster. Any draft pick is a swing, phili missed on several number 1 overall selections. I would take any of the Sf selection on the board over another year of Julian Champagnie in the starting lineup


Bonesawisready5

Well to be fair Castle may actually play SF he kinda did for UCONNbut wants to play PG and did play PG In high school. ANT is a FA summer 2029 so you never know


Tunechi_Sama

If Castle plays Sf then im mad at them not addressing other needs, again this team needs talent. Timberwolves could also be a 1 seed in the playoffs when the pick conveys. I'm not mad at the picks acquired, at the very least they are tradeable assets, the frustration is all the needs not addressed in favor of the unknown


Bonesawisready5

Rome wasnā€™t built in a day and they can in FA


Tunechi_Sama

But today is the draft so I'm reacting to the draft. Im not impatient and know to trust PATFO, BUT that doesn't mean I can't be disappointed in the moment


zriojas25

I donā€™t have an issue with passing up on Dillingham (Devin Carter fan lol) and idk what his NBA future holds but yā€™all acting like heā€™s guaranteed to be a certified bum is just hilarious.


siniztra

ong


empowered676

Not true draft class is OK There were no stars We don't need a star We need players


No_Barnacle9439

>I would argue we don't even need Rob. Most people aren't arguing this. You can draft other better prospect if Rob isn't a good fit.


keldpxowjwsn

2 is a key point. Not to mention that those picks could be very valuable in several years to use in trades The league is cyclical, the spurs being consistently good for 20 years was unprecedented and certainly not the norm. Even the warriors in 7 years went from a dynasty to being what they are now and thats with still having Curry klay and draymond


ASithLordNoAffect

The main problem is pushing out the pick so far. Wemby will be ready to win this year or next. A pick now vs two picks that might be better years from now seems worth it.


GideonWainright

Guess only impatient spurs fans, media guys lacking content, and minnesota believed in the 2024 draft. I'll happily take the Spurs front office over that field.


Joethetoolguy

We turned a top 10 first into potentially just a late first. This too much gambling bro


anonperson1567

Yā€™all got the best player of the draft (again) and youā€™re *complaining*? Iā€™m a Wizards fan, man, have some perspectiveā€¦


A_Curious_Cockroach

Have you seen our point guards? We most definitely needed a point guard with some serious offensive punch, and Rob fit that bill. You guys can't be series thinking this was a good trade? Those picks 6 and 7 years from now have exactly no value, because no one knows what happens 6 or 7 years from now. The spurs didn't do anything but trade something that has value right now, an 8th pick, for something that doesn't have any value right now, a pick in 6 and 7 years. And there is no guarantee that it will ever have value. It was the worst possible outcome of tonight's draft. The only thing the Spurs couldn't do was throw a pick away for nothing and that's exactly what they did.


PressureMiserable

Dillingham at best will be a 6th man who really can only score, he's gonna get burnt constantly and will struggle adjusting to the leagues physicality for a couple years I expect. Living up to his fullest potential like absolutely highest max is something along the lines of kemba walker. Kemba was good but only on a bad team the only real good team he played on was the Celtics and the dude was God awful in the playoffs it's amazing that team went as far with him as they did. There's no guarantee he'll even look the same as he did in college plenty of guys have looked far better and ended up being out of the league early


pfthr0w

Its not even about Rob, Ā Spurs clearly picked who the Wolves wanted because the trade was near immediate. Ā Just an all around all time bad trade by the Spurs ever. Ā They could have traded that pick for something much better even next year. Ā The Spurs probably got the worst value possible for the trade. Ā Heck a 2nd round pick tbis year would have been better to roll the dice on a player with a low salary cap. Ā Wemby is going to bounce in a few years at this rate with the pick hoarding low IQ moves Brian has been doing since being GM. Ā The Wizards ran circles in a trade today with what they got trading a average player.


PressureMiserable

The wizards got fleeced, they gave up their best young player who's only 22 for some maybes, Deni was one of the better defenders in the league despite how bad Washington was and surrounded by bad defenders like Poole and kuzma. 2 firsts in back to back drafts when the only guy under contract is most likely gonna be ant for the twolves and an incoming ownership that desperately wants to get below the cap means no one really knows what the wolves are gonna look like by then. Their track record has shown they're very prone to just mess up their own team and it seems like ownership might screw over the team before they have the chance, the only way to cut costs is to lose guys like Mcdaniels and Reid since teams won't take on gobert and and KATs huge contracts so they have to go all in. We're gonna run into a similar problem eventually and the best way not to be forced to go all on is to have draft picks to either move bad contracts or draft good players on cheap contracts


holaprobando123

>Dillingham at best will be a 6th man who really can only score, he's gonna get burnt constantly We had Patty for ages and he became an icon of the team in that time. And he was as bad on defense as Forbes.


PressureMiserable

Patty was also playing with all time defenders a lot of that time, he was probably the worst defender on the team but he was still able to be decent because he was a good system defender. I think Branham could do the same since he has the physical tools but it'd be harder for him to get more experience and learn to play around other guys when we'd also have to do the same for someone like Dillingham


holaprobando123

> he was probably the worst defender on the team but he was still able to be decent because he was a good system defender Decent my ass, I got tired of seeing Patty run after guys he had to be in front of. He was as bad as Forbes, or worse. If he wasn't a bottom 10 defender in the NBA, I'll eat my shoe.


PressureMiserable

That's cus we've seen enough of patty to see all his faults plenty of guys were worse than him u just probably didn't pay attention to them much so they're not gonna stand out


siphillis

This past playoffs just showed how bad it is to have someone who can get hunted on the defensive end. If Luka and Murray are bad enough, imagine a six-footer who doesn't care about defense


lowkeyslightlynerdy

People have been freaking out on all the subs acting like it was a dumb move by Spurs. ā€œWhy would they trade their guard??!ā€


ziggyzigg95

Even if Ant leaves itā€™s likely not before 2031 after his super max


No_Barnacle9439

>we turned 1 first rounder into 2 first rounders. A pick swap is not a pick. Stop confusing these two. Especially in this case, Minnesota needs to be worse than both Dallas and Spurs for that swap to be valuable.


thinks1ow

They canā€™t afford to renew Kat, he wonā€™t be on the team come next February


puro_xrp

Great flip to turn the 8th pick in a weak class to ammo for our next move. Look at how many picks it took to get Bridges for the Knicks


PierroElLoco

I feel like the Front Office wants to tank one more year for Nolan Traore


D4RK_3LF

Turned a Raptors pick that likely wouldn't even have converted into an unprotected first and a pick swap in 7 years with a team that's historically not been great.


Designer-Action3573

I'm over my initial shock. Maybe I am being too optimistic but those picks from Minny are going to get packaged for a trade this summer


InsertDev

It's tough. Because I can see why they traded the pick away. But it hurts to see a top 8 pick go when you can try to draft pieces now to fit around Victor. On one hand I understand not wanting to pay any of those players rookie lottery money/not believing in them and potentially using that draft pick on trades. But young players to draft and grow with Victor is something I would have liked to see long term and short term. This doesn't even mean for Rob Dillingham. This is for any player Devin Carter, Matas, Topic etc.


BabySealKebab

buzelis at 8 would have been nice, but I guess they don't believe in him at all...


pwtrash

The disappointment last night definitely got the better of me. I didn't know it was only top 1 protected at the time, which changes my opinion a bit. It's still a loooong way away. There will be an all-star or two out of this class that we missed, and it will feel like a missed opportunity.


chic_peas

The fact that we traded out is not the issue. That's terrible value. There is no way around saying that traded the 8th pick for a pick in 7 years that will likely be lower. We got fleeced in value any way you look at how the trade helps.


keexko

I just wanted him to be a Spur šŸ˜­ he soundednlike he genuinely wanted to play for the org.


pfthr0w

Thats more like very poor scouting. You don't know how any draft class will actually be, many players can develop from a draft class people perceive as "bad", and plenty of top picks from good draft classes can bust hard. Ayton, Simmons, Jabari Parker, Andrew Wiggins, I can keep going on. Joker? Pick 41, was that precieved as a good or bad draft class? Who was picked 1st and 2nd? Wiggins and Parker, who was picked next? Embiid.


adognamedpenguin

Should have gotten Monte morris from the wolves instead. Proper point guard.


Hot_Chard5988

Agree with everything you stated. Dillingham is not a Spurs guy


Chanman2233

Think about the dollars paid to not one but two top 15 picks. Spurs are making a money savings play here and still getting the pick that they wanted.


9jajajaj9

Dillingham and those faraway picks are both useless for the goal of contending in the next few years. Hopefully the picks are flipped for something more useful


MortysTrapHouse

we dont know this draft class is bad yet. its extremely boom or bust as much as i ever saw but lots of talents with high ceilings. its insane to say the draft is bad right now. it takes years to know


Stuck_in_TN

I was talking to a Kentucky fan and he told me before the draft Rob wouldn't be a good fit because he didn't play defense and wasn't sure if he could become what Pop would want.


InThePaleMoonLyte

leading up to the draft all of you motherfuckers were talking about how deep the draft was, there just wasn't a consensus #1 overall now that we've traded out of it, it's back to this draft being terrible holy copium


Cleanandslobber

You forget to mention the most impressive and obvious fact of the draft. We got our guy, a high ceiling guy with a great body and NBA ready defense. In a bad draft that can be very difficult.


Shellstr

We didnā€™t turn 1 pick into 2. One of them is a SWAP, so it is meaningless if we are better than the wolves, and the 2031 pick is only better than this years number 8 if the wolves are bad. So if the wolves stay good, these picks will be bad.


bleu_waffl3s

If weā€™re better than the wolves then we can swap and take their higher pick.


Shellstr

Yes, and give up our pick in the swap. We donā€™t get two ā€œnewā€, which OP said we turned 1 pick into 2 picks. We did not.


Tunechi_Sama

And we already have a Mavs swap that year


RCA2CE

We didnā€™t turn a first rounder into two We turned a #8 this year into a gamble 7 years from now We have less valuable assets than we started the day with


Tunechi_Sama

Have 2 swaps in the same year is what doesn't make sense to me. So we will have too trade the least favorable swap available. Assuming we a better than both team in those years or now we have 2 swaps to trade


jo3pro

Okā€¦ā€¦ I donā€™t think most people are upset about us trading out of this draft. Itā€™s what we got back from the trade. I would venture to guess the Spurs couldā€™ve gotten more than a pick that is 6 to 7 years away! I also understand that this could be a small piece to a bigger trade, but right now none of us know if this is the case. So itā€™s kinda understandable why ā€œat this momentā€ a lot of folks are upset.


CoyotesSideEyes

I kept hoping the Raps pick wouldn't convey. I love this part of the outcome


jhunger12334

Dumb we didnā€™t get at least 1 shooter. Shooting is mad expensive and Vic wants to compete.


SpecialWhenLitTX

All of the best lottery shooters were bad point-of-attack defenders, all those guys are gonna get swapped onto and hunted, especially during the playoffs, the Celtics were absolutely ruthless with that this year


ziggyzigg95

Thereā€™s no way you can convince me thatā€™s the best they could get for the #8. That pick will be worthless because of Ant.


pfthr0w

Yeah this is pure cope. Ā 


Empty-Mall-1636

No, the fact we are looking 7 years down the line for draft talent is insane. We need shooting, with Castle, he couldā€™ve made up for Robā€™s defense.


Frankbuster

Dawg the picks are probably for a trade. I donā€™t think weā€™re gonna actually use those picks.


Empty-Mall-1636

It better be or else my point stands.


thematrix185

It's extending the life of the asset to its maximum. It'll probably be traded at some point but if not it could be a really valuable asset in Wembys prime


BakerCakeMaker

Wemby won't need to be in his prime to be MVP level. If we value these picks so little we might as well get Bronny at 35 and try to compete immediately with Lebron on discount. It'd be hard to turn down playing with his son AND Wemby.


thematrix185

So little? An unprotected first is always very valuable


BakerCakeMaker

Only if we're counting on Ant to be on another team in his prime.


christopherfar

Which is likely.


BakerCakeMaker

Is it? You can count out the possibility of Memphis wanting him gone.


Account-Forgot

An unprotected first is worth 20% of Mikal Bridges. Get better players in the building now. Half our roster should be in the G league or playing in Europe. Not a deep draft but getting a legitimate NBA rotation player on a rookie deal is a win and would help.


BBQLovingBastard

The 2031 pick isnā€™t gonna be in the lottery, the Wolves have Ant and are gonna be competing for the next 10+ years. Why is the fanbase being so delusional, do we need to justify everything?


passionatelyse1

Youā€™re trying to justify rob as being a good pick. Regardless, whether or not itā€™s in the lottery probably doesnā€™t even matter! Because itā€™ll probably be sent away for a superstar/key role player at some point who wonā€™t have robā€™s liabilities


BBQLovingBastard

We better go trade for Garland now. Iā€™m so sick of this bullshit. Defer defer defer. We already have a million fucking picks, we donā€™t need even more.


EazyBreezee

What part of OPā€™s #2 point donā€™t you understand? Without that draft capital they can only build through free agency. Building through free agency ONLY is not a recipe for a championship contending team


PressureMiserable

Ur betting on the twolves who's longest run of dominance is about 5 years from 99-04 where they were mostly a mid team and franchise peak at getting 4-2 and swept in the wcf with multiple years of being horrendous are not only gonna be good in 10 years but stay good for 10+ years? That's so many what ifs it's just as likely we'll end up with multiple 1st overalls during that time period than them being consistently good for 10 years


[deleted]

[уŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]


NBASpurs-ModTeam

Content does not abide by "Behavior" rule.


wanderinglittlehuman

Everyone thinks theyā€™ll be competing for the next decade when they have a star. But the nba is so unpredictable and championship windows are rarely a decade long.


astronxxt

>donā€™t be upset >everyone is overreacting ah, how iā€™ve missed the ā€œletā€™s pretend like pointing out somewhat obvious truths will change peopleā€™s minds because i canā€™t handle disagreementsā€ posting.


MikeMaxM

Historically? LOL. No one of those guys havent even played a single game in NBA and you talk about history. We may have missed next Giannis or Gobert type players in this draft. There are always good players in every draft who go unnoticed. We problem is we not only didnt notice those hidden gems we didnt even try to draft a player and develop him. We were bragging about our ability to develop players and draft well and we just straight up refused to do this with 8th pick.


redditmodsdownvote

LMFAO OP thinks it is almost CERTAIN the 2030 draft class, all of which are currently in the 7th grade or so, is going to be better than this class, and also believes that the timberwolves, who have a 22 year old anthony edwards who will be coming into his prime in 2030, will be pretty bad by that time? HOW DUMB ARE YOU TEXAS FANS OMG!?