Yep. Foucault, famous for his analysis of power in society, argued to abolish age of consent laws and saw no abuse of power in this.
According to Wikipedia: he argued that children are able to give consent to sexual relations, saying that assuming "that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable."
Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws
Yes. Same\*\*\* as in Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Czech Republic, Greece, Croatia... [and the list goes on](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe#Summary)
\*\*\*Some big asterisks here. The actual details vary from country to country; more info in the link provided. But in a nutshell, it is 15 or around 15 in many European countries.
Maybe this applies to more than just Hollywood but the in general movie industry, as they all strive for the same goal with similar motives but are corrupt in some disturbing way nonetheless
People cited “cultural differences” and “bringing attention to the issue” as reasons why it was okay, there have been documentaries about porn that were pornographic then that “movie”
Edit: apparently I can’t write
What bothers me is what he did was actual rape. None of this 'she was too younger to understand' stuff. She clearly was not consenting and Polanski raped her. It would've been illegal if she had been 25.
How does Hollywood defend that? Shows they have no morals at all. Fucking hell, there are pedophiles with better morals that Hollywood.
Keanu? I bet he and I probably wouldn't agree or even like each other, but so far I can't think of anything heinous or hypocritical he's done. Seems respectable so far.
Ralph Macchio left acting entirely for his marriage in the 80s? Seems like a normal guy.
Russell Brand is REALLY stupidpolpilled, check out his youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCswH8ovgUp5Bdg-0_JTYFNw
He kinda buys into some new age spirituality stuff but other than that he's posted about covid being used to facilitate wealth transfer, the surveillance state, etc.
For a group of people that like to rape each other, avoid taxes, bribe institutions, hoard money, hoard resources, pedal snake oil and talk down to anyone who disagrees with them Hollywood’s folk sure as shit love to pretend that they’re progressive.
Well, since singing a song about communism, written by a phenomenally rich man, from your incredibly expensive home seems to be all it takes for most of the current social orthodoxy to fall in love with you, they don’t have much incentive to do anything that isn’t purely performative.
Yeah, I never got that song.
I always thought Paul McCartney was the better and more talented one (on top of being generally a better overall human being) but didn't receive the same level of respect, adoration, and attention Lennon did.
I mean, Lennon was definitely a better lyricist, I'll give him that one, but neither of them are all that impressive regarding that aspect. By that, I mean it's not like either of them were Bob Dylan or whatever. Thus, it boils down to the other stuff and I feel Paul is just flat out better.
Honestly, I've got really nothing against it. I liked it when I was younger, and sort of just became neutral to it after the "rich celebs singing imagine during quarantine" controversy.
That said, I'm not oblivious to the irony of who it was written by and its subject matter, but I feel like that's a different case (it's ok that it was written by Lennon, but shitty the way it was used recently). I feel like the song is more like "imagine this kind of world, imagine if there was an ideal world where there was no human struggle/suffering" whereas modern celebs took it literally and sang about it as a class unification song (which, again, I stress, *it isn't*) in the backdrop of enormous wealth hoarding. But idk lol that's just my personal take...
It’s a nice sounding song. I like the piano riff, but the lyrics are horrifying. The society it describes is one of absolute nothingness, and people act like it’s some kind of ideal
Not really the best example: that "One Week into Quarantine Imagine Cover" was one of the few things I saw absolutely everyone from across the political spectrum come together to roast the celebs for.
Yeah I have yet to see a single person that actually liked that performance. It was extremely tone-deaf, and not in the musical sense. No idea where they got the idea it was popular or even liked by most people.
Don't forget some, if not most, Hollywood people are vocally anti gun. They'd campaign to have gun rights abolished to the average person but will keep their private security armed to the teeth.
Hollywood and Tech are capitalists that are smart enough to realize that minorities, women, and LBGTQ+ folk have money to spend.
Tech and media are also smart enough to tap into and profit off of both sides of the cultural divide. They are profiting enormously by stoking a culture war that distracts us from talking about class structure and income inequality.
Not really. It's mostly the second and third mask (profiteer pig LARPing as woke).
Wouldn't surprise me, though: seems to be a thing among anyone powerful.
that said, you generally don't get big money without being an absolute tosser of a human non-being. you've got to be pretty blind to your abuses to just keep it going past a certain point.
Status and money does.
Once you get those, you can fuck Californian 10s on a whim. Eventually you get bored and started going down a more fucked road and then Jeffery Epstien has a portrait of you wearing a dress at his sex island mansion.
Like how people start at regular vanilla porn, and then go to hardcore porn and then they evolve into coomers if you leave them alone long enough.
> seems to be a thing among anyone powerful.
I guess after you've had your share of your personal idea of 10/10s willing to fuck you 5 at a time however you want and act out your ever fantasy because you have a billion dollars, you start getting into sicker and sicker shit because the 10/10 orgies get stale...like progressing porn addiction, but IRL because money.
Holywood has got to be the world's least secret cult yet no one seems to care enough to examine and inspect it.
Orange lib lefts absolutely worship celebrities but at the same time claim to despise the rich, not understanding the extreme pandering for profit Holywood is guilty of.
It's enough to make a man Auth-Left.
Same reason why people think they're "anti-Establishment" or "Burning it all Down" while having the same opinion as major political parties, big banks and corporations, and the MSM...
Three times in fact but one of those fuckers was elected twice. And arguably, Eisenhower also was a celebrity. But being a general should make you good at administrative things, so he was at least qualified for the position.
Say you are an evil villain, like a James Bond bad guy but not stupid. You want to bend politicians to your will. You want to control celebrities. Anyone with power, you want to have them serve you.
You could try money, but that's limited. And too costly. Some people can't be bought, and some people get rich enough they stop giving a fuck. So you blackmail them instead. What's the best thing you can blackmail them with? A video of them raping a child.
Now how to actually get that video takes some work (though a combination of having one of their friends already under your control, drugs, and children that can almost pass for 18 can get you a good ways there). Why do you think none of the Epstein tapes have ever led to anyone else being charged? They just went back into what ever agencies vault of blackmail material if someone ever steps out of line.
Epstein was a CIA asset. Politician goes to his Island, screws some kids, it's secretly recorded. Then they use videos of politicians having sex with children as leverage.
How deep does it go? Who controls who? Nobody knows.
Blackmail, bud. Read about the epstien case if you arent familiar. If you want to go deep, look into "the finders". Ted gunderson too, a retired fbi agent that investigated this stuff
How do you know he was a CIA asset? What leads you to think that?
Ghislaine Maxwell - who functioned as Epstein's handler - was as much a Mossad asset as we are able to tell and we know of the relationship of her father with Mossad which is confirmed. It was made official as a result of the scandal that surrounded his flight from Britain as a result of double espionage for the Soviets.
She also fled to Israel to protect herself and was handed over in a very unexpected turn of events. Whatever happened in DC was big enough to pull some truly powerful levers if Mossad gave up one of their assets.
People think about American intelligence as the source of all things evil, but let's not forget that what remains of the British Empire still exists in the shadow world of offshore banking and they are probably even more connected to the Israelis than Americans are. The Brits set this whole thing up before WW1 to protect Suez Canal. Americans just changed ships in early 1970s as a form of pressure on the Gulf monarchies.
You want to know where American corporations offshore their profits? That's how the ex-Empire stays relevant.It's a wildly profitable business and they need to protect themselves from governments looking to get extra tax dollars.
Also that's the real cause for Brexit by the way. To stop Whitehall from applying new transparency initiatives from Brussels.
I recommend you look up the personal relationships of some of the monarchs in Europe - especially in places that are multinational tax-dodger friedly like the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden. Just look who some of the people in the royal family marry. In the case of the new king of Netherlands it is as blatant as you can get. But the Norwegian family is very interesting. They all marry honeypots - whether it's a prince or princess.
Monarchies have that very neat thing about them that they do not produce laws based on consent of the governed like republics do but on the convoluted ancient system of personal rights.
This is why British monarchy will be defended by the shadow empire to the last drop of blood because the moment Britain turns republican all of the laws that protect the tax havens can go up in smoke. Because they will have to be written up from scratch with "consent of the governed" expressed in some constitution at the foundation of the legal system.
When the regular Joe learns that they have a say if some ancient right protecting bank secrecy on some minor dependency stays or not... what do you think he will say? And we can't have that so everyone wave and smile, it's the queen! Isn't it great that we have a queen and don't have to worry about those pesky elections?
Anyway. You don't have to trust me. I'm only trying to crush capitalism. No agenda here.
> This is why British monarchy will be defended by the shadow empire to the last drop of blood because the moment Britain turns republican all of the laws that protect the tax havens can go up in smoke. Because they will have to be written up from scratch with "consent of the governed" expressed in some constitution at the foundation of the legal system.
>
> When the regular Joe learns that they have a say if some ancient right protecting bank secrecy on some minor dependency stays or not... what do you think he will say? And we can't have that so everyone wave and smile, it's the queen! Isn't it great that we have a queen and don't have to worry about those pesky elections?
I don't really understand. Are you saying people in the UK could vote away tax havens like Sweden, but are too distracted because of the Queen?
Yes. When you're rich and powerful, life gets boring. There's a certain thrill to doing something so taboo and getting away with it, which is why they do it.
This is also the reason why Hollywood always takes the side of sexual freedom, to defend their lifestyle.
Purple was the original color for LibRight. Then it got changed to yellow and LibRights had a sperg-out over it so the mods kept both. Now purple is just LibRight+repeal the age of consent.
And before you ask; no, they’re not actually pedos..or are they?
tbh i think most people just like to roleplay the extreme of their political view or just change it because they find it funny, i am personally not even lib right but i still like to make pedo jokes and the purple flair helps the comedy
its the same with authcenters going along with the nazi thing, pretty sure most of them are just doing that for le edgy even though their ideologies do fall in authcenter
Mr Epstein can I say hi to all of these celebrities on your private jet. I hope I have fun on your island with all these famouse people and I totally won't have something bad happen to me.
Fucking hell and this isn’t wrong either, *do you want this role or not*
Reminder that Cuties was not a dream they actually released that.
Wasn’t Hollywood though, French I think
Good point. Wanna go authcenter and finish what Germany couldn't?
I say we talk some enterprising young failed art student in Germany into it, then just not save them this time.
There's gotta be a vegan somewhere who's willing to meat us halfway.
Yeah we have one of those, he even does have the [same initials](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attila_Hildmann)
You heard it here, folks, vegans are Nazis
Truth
French is pretty pedo too. Simone Du Beauvoir was French and pushed for the lowering of the age of consent from 15 to 14.
Wasn’t there a big push by French intellectuals to legalize it in the 70s?
Yep. Foucault, famous for his analysis of power in society, argued to abolish age of consent laws and saw no abuse of power in this. According to Wikipedia: he argued that children are able to give consent to sexual relations, saying that assuming "that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable." Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petition_against_age_of_consent_laws
[удалено]
There is probably no other phrase that instills more disgust in me than "French intellectuals" does.
[удалено]
Based
Wait it’s 15 in France?
Yes. Same\*\*\* as in Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Czech Republic, Greece, Croatia... [and the list goes on](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe#Summary) \*\*\*Some big asterisks here. The actual details vary from country to country; more info in the link provided. But in a nutshell, it is 15 or around 15 in many European countries.
ha! we brits are far more civilized! *sweats in 16 years is the age of consent
In America it’s 16-18 depending on the state you’re in
But released on Netflix. We count them as Hollywood right? Maybe not, but at the very least Hollywood-adjacent
I think we do because they have a studio there
Maybe this applies to more than just Hollywood but the in general movie industry, as they all strive for the same goal with similar motives but are corrupt in some disturbing way nonetheless
Tbf French cinema was the precursor to Hollywood. Also Cannes is like the biggest Hollywood circle jerk ever.
And promoted it. And acted like it was good. Fucking insane.
People cited “cultural differences” and “bringing attention to the issue” as reasons why it was okay, there have been documentaries about porn that were pornographic then that “movie” Edit: apparently I can’t write
Is a "less" missing?
Indeed, seems I forgot how to write
Yep , the french are fucking weird and bigwigs at Hollywood facilitate that
Thanks for reminding me that this exists I just got done purging it from my memory.
Dan “show me your feet or hit the street” Schneider
[удалено]
Dan "Hold her tighter she's a fighter" Schneider
Dan "No condom, I'll finish inside her" Schneider
[удалено]
[удалено]
We got hot by asteroid back in 2012 m8, the last 8 years have been Humanity's collective limbo experience.
I look in Chris Evans eyes, and I see the things he had to do to become famous
Based and RomanPolanskiPilled
We watched his version of macbeth in english and no fucking joke there was a naked kid on the film
And lots of Hollywood actually defend him. Meryl Streep still does.
What bothers me is what he did was actual rape. None of this 'she was too younger to understand' stuff. She clearly was not consenting and Polanski raped her. It would've been illegal if she had been 25. How does Hollywood defend that? Shows they have no morals at all. Fucking hell, there are pedophiles with better morals that Hollywood.
No, I'm pretty sure Whoopi Goldberg said it wasn't "rape rape" so it's ok.
She was permanently physically traumatized but hey Whoopi was his friend so
Well, there’s another celebrity I’ve lost respect for. I’ll have to add another page to the list
Save paper, make a list of celebrities you do respect. You'll maybe get one page, single side.
I can’t think of any off the top of my head tbh
Keanu? I bet he and I probably wouldn't agree or even like each other, but so far I can't think of anything heinous or hypocritical he's done. Seems respectable so far. Ralph Macchio left acting entirely for his marriage in the 80s? Seems like a normal guy.
Yeah Keanu seems pretty cool. And I like Macchio. Does he still look like a sixteen year old kid?
A very tired and chubby one, but yeah. Cobra Kai is pretty based, ngl.
Rick Moranis is a pretty great fellow. Left acting to take care of his children after his wife passed
Matthew McConaughey is pretty cool. Helps the homeless, is chill as fuck and thinks people should stop resorting to identity politics.
Russell Brand is REALLY stupidpolpilled, check out his youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCswH8ovgUp5Bdg-0_JTYFNw He kinda buys into some new age spirituality stuff but other than that he's posted about covid being used to facilitate wealth transfer, the surveillance state, etc.
Sure, but we all knew he was insane before he even started dating Katy Perry like... oh, crap, that was a decade ago?
Exactly, the cunt needs to be castrated with a rusty knife and left to drain while getting a beating by all his victims
For a group of people that like to rape each other, avoid taxes, bribe institutions, hoard money, hoard resources, pedal snake oil and talk down to anyone who disagrees with them Hollywood’s folk sure as shit love to pretend that they’re progressive.
Well, since singing a song about communism, written by a phenomenally rich man, from your incredibly expensive home seems to be all it takes for most of the current social orthodoxy to fall in love with you, they don’t have much incentive to do anything that isn’t purely performative.
Wait, which song are we talking about here?
Imagine by John Lennon.
God I hate that song with a passion
[удалено]
Lmao based
Yeah, I never got that song. I always thought Paul McCartney was the better and more talented one (on top of being generally a better overall human being) but didn't receive the same level of respect, adoration, and attention Lennon did. I mean, Lennon was definitely a better lyricist, I'll give him that one, but neither of them are all that impressive regarding that aspect. By that, I mean it's not like either of them were Bob Dylan or whatever. Thus, it boils down to the other stuff and I feel Paul is just flat out better.
People only adore Lenon because he died.
I will admit that its got a good melody, but the second you listen to the lyrics you realize they are describing hell on earth lmfao
Honestly, I've got really nothing against it. I liked it when I was younger, and sort of just became neutral to it after the "rich celebs singing imagine during quarantine" controversy. That said, I'm not oblivious to the irony of who it was written by and its subject matter, but I feel like that's a different case (it's ok that it was written by Lennon, but shitty the way it was used recently). I feel like the song is more like "imagine this kind of world, imagine if there was an ideal world where there was no human struggle/suffering" whereas modern celebs took it literally and sang about it as a class unification song (which, again, I stress, *it isn't*) in the backdrop of enormous wealth hoarding. But idk lol that's just my personal take...
Spoken like a true grey centrist.
> “I have no strong feelings one way or the other.” \- A Centrist.
It’s a nice sounding song. I like the piano riff, but the lyrics are horrifying. The society it describes is one of absolute nothingness, and people act like it’s some kind of ideal
What do you expect from a guy whose idea of protesting the war was laying in bed all day, shooting heroin?
Don't forget beating his first wife and abusing his son so much that he's now deaf in one ear from the screaming. What a swell guy.
I disagree with it imagining a hell scape but I don’t deny the blatant hypocrisy
True, for a LibLeft it’s closer to an ideal than for an AuthRight I suppose.
Probably for most liblefts, but the song makes me absolutely sick.
Eh, I don't even think it has that good of a melody personally, but then that's more a matter of personal taste.
Imagine there were no .38 snub revolvers 😫
Quite sad innit? Ih really makes me think abou’ih 😔
lol
Not really the best example: that "One Week into Quarantine Imagine Cover" was one of the few things I saw absolutely everyone from across the political spectrum come together to roast the celebs for.
Yeah I have yet to see a single person that actually liked that performance. It was extremely tone-deaf, and not in the musical sense. No idea where they got the idea it was popular or even liked by most people.
Don't forget some, if not most, Hollywood people are vocally anti gun. They'd campaign to have gun rights abolished to the average person but will keep their private security armed to the teeth.
Hollywood and Tech are capitalists that are smart enough to realize that minorities, women, and LBGTQ+ folk have money to spend. Tech and media are also smart enough to tap into and profit off of both sides of the cultural divide. They are profiting enormously by stoking a culture war that distracts us from talking about class structure and income inequality.
based beyond based
based
Accurate, based, also applies to big tech.
Also applies to everything big
Even Chungus?! 😳😳😳
Especially Chungus.
Chungus? What are you, a fucking commie? It's Chungme, my family and Jesus. Cring Libtards, fax don't care about your phone. USA USA USA 🇺🇸
MERICA
FUCK YEAH
COMIN TO SAVE THE MOTHERFUCKIN DAY YEA *FWOOOOOSH*
MERICA
FUCK YEAH
Based
Chungme but JesUS... Curious
Really? Including ButtPoopSex?
Of all the words in your username, the joke stemmed from “big.” What are the odds...
Is Biggie Smalls big or small?
Deez big nuts
Yes. It's almost as if the rich and powerful keep each other in line by compelled membership in sick sex cults, as a form of MAD.
[удалено]
Based
do you have any sources that big tech leaders are involved in pedophilia or is this speculation?
Not really. It's mostly the second and third mask (profiteer pig LARPing as woke). Wouldn't surprise me, though: seems to be a thing among anyone powerful.
Does money make you a nonce or does being a nonce get you money?
Top 10 questions science can’t answer
Unironically probably the former. When you have no more new highs to chase I’m sure you eventually get bored abd start being a degenerate.
that said, you generally don't get big money without being an absolute tosser of a human non-being. you've got to be pretty blind to your abuses to just keep it going past a certain point.
Status and money does. Once you get those, you can fuck Californian 10s on a whim. Eventually you get bored and started going down a more fucked road and then Jeffery Epstien has a portrait of you wearing a dress at his sex island mansion. Like how people start at regular vanilla porn, and then go to hardcore porn and then they evolve into coomers if you leave them alone long enough.
Probably the same reason people hunt endangered animals: the thrill of doing horrible things knowing nobody can stop you.
> seems to be a thing among anyone powerful. I guess after you've had your share of your personal idea of 10/10s willing to fuck you 5 at a time however you want and act out your ever fantasy because you have a billion dollars, you start getting into sicker and sicker shit because the 10/10 orgies get stale...like progressing porn addiction, but IRL because money.
[удалено]
The mid-level staff are unsufferably woke, but Zuckerberg is just interested in robot fuel.
It seems to be a thing among big players. It's a system of blackmail that keeps everyone together.
yeah, ive seen sources for that on politicians, but never on tech leaders. im not defending them, just wondering if there was anything to back it up.
Holywood has got to be the world's least secret cult yet no one seems to care enough to examine and inspect it. Orange lib lefts absolutely worship celebrities but at the same time claim to despise the rich, not understanding the extreme pandering for profit Holywood is guilty of. It's enough to make a man Auth-Left.
Orange libleft says they hate white men yet simp for Harry Styles and Tom Holland. Curious.
femboy fetish
Based
u/QuietLittleVoice is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1. Rank: House of Cards I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
Thats a great point mate
Based to hell and back
Their hoo-ha's aren't as woke I guess
Celebrity worship in the US is a cancer
Celebrity worship is far far from a US issue. One just has to look at J-Pop and K-Pop stars.
Or how nuts guys can get about some sports. Messi vs Ronaldo, Federer vs Nadal
Same reason why people think they're "anti-Establishment" or "Burning it all Down" while having the same opinion as major political parties, big banks and corporations, and the MSM...
Authrights claim to hate celebrities but keep electing them as presidents
Curious
Give them a break, they’ve only done it twice.
which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice
You're not counting Schwarzenegger tho he was only governator.
Three times in fact but one of those fuckers was elected twice. And arguably, Eisenhower also was a celebrity. But being a general should make you good at administrative things, so he was at least qualified for the position.
I only counted Reagan as one and I didn’t count military celebrities at all since I think it’s a pretty relevant skillset for the job.
I mean Reagan was governor of California and before a campaign manager for Goldwater, so I guess he was decent at administrative stuff too
he got that position in the first place by being the administrator of the Actors guild, so if he didn’t get into acting who knows
Is everything bad in this world run pedos?
What better way to make someone do psychopathic, evil shit than to forever dangle a videotape of them raping children over their head?
Wai what
Say you are an evil villain, like a James Bond bad guy but not stupid. You want to bend politicians to your will. You want to control celebrities. Anyone with power, you want to have them serve you. You could try money, but that's limited. And too costly. Some people can't be bought, and some people get rich enough they stop giving a fuck. So you blackmail them instead. What's the best thing you can blackmail them with? A video of them raping a child. Now how to actually get that video takes some work (though a combination of having one of their friends already under your control, drugs, and children that can almost pass for 18 can get you a good ways there). Why do you think none of the Epstein tapes have ever led to anyone else being charged? They just went back into what ever agencies vault of blackmail material if someone ever steps out of line.
Epstein was a CIA asset. Politician goes to his Island, screws some kids, it's secretly recorded. Then they use videos of politicians having sex with children as leverage. How deep does it go? Who controls who? Nobody knows.
What does the cia want from them
Political leverage my dude
Blackmail, bud. Read about the epstien case if you arent familiar. If you want to go deep, look into "the finders". Ted gunderson too, a retired fbi agent that investigated this stuff
How do you think the CIA got away with selling crack in the 80s? Political pressure my man. Welcome to the deep state.
Control.
How do you know he was a CIA asset? What leads you to think that? Ghislaine Maxwell - who functioned as Epstein's handler - was as much a Mossad asset as we are able to tell and we know of the relationship of her father with Mossad which is confirmed. It was made official as a result of the scandal that surrounded his flight from Britain as a result of double espionage for the Soviets. She also fled to Israel to protect herself and was handed over in a very unexpected turn of events. Whatever happened in DC was big enough to pull some truly powerful levers if Mossad gave up one of their assets. People think about American intelligence as the source of all things evil, but let's not forget that what remains of the British Empire still exists in the shadow world of offshore banking and they are probably even more connected to the Israelis than Americans are. The Brits set this whole thing up before WW1 to protect Suez Canal. Americans just changed ships in early 1970s as a form of pressure on the Gulf monarchies. You want to know where American corporations offshore their profits? That's how the ex-Empire stays relevant.It's a wildly profitable business and they need to protect themselves from governments looking to get extra tax dollars. Also that's the real cause for Brexit by the way. To stop Whitehall from applying new transparency initiatives from Brussels. I recommend you look up the personal relationships of some of the monarchs in Europe - especially in places that are multinational tax-dodger friedly like the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden. Just look who some of the people in the royal family marry. In the case of the new king of Netherlands it is as blatant as you can get. But the Norwegian family is very interesting. They all marry honeypots - whether it's a prince or princess. Monarchies have that very neat thing about them that they do not produce laws based on consent of the governed like republics do but on the convoluted ancient system of personal rights. This is why British monarchy will be defended by the shadow empire to the last drop of blood because the moment Britain turns republican all of the laws that protect the tax havens can go up in smoke. Because they will have to be written up from scratch with "consent of the governed" expressed in some constitution at the foundation of the legal system. When the regular Joe learns that they have a say if some ancient right protecting bank secrecy on some minor dependency stays or not... what do you think he will say? And we can't have that so everyone wave and smile, it's the queen! Isn't it great that we have a queen and don't have to worry about those pesky elections? Anyway. You don't have to trust me. I'm only trying to crush capitalism. No agenda here.
> This is why British monarchy will be defended by the shadow empire to the last drop of blood because the moment Britain turns republican all of the laws that protect the tax havens can go up in smoke. Because they will have to be written up from scratch with "consent of the governed" expressed in some constitution at the foundation of the legal system. > > When the regular Joe learns that they have a say if some ancient right protecting bank secrecy on some minor dependency stays or not... what do you think he will say? And we can't have that so everyone wave and smile, it's the queen! Isn't it great that we have a queen and don't have to worry about those pesky elections? I don't really understand. Are you saying people in the UK could vote away tax havens like Sweden, but are too distracted because of the Queen?
Subscribe and based
Wait purple is behind everything?
[удалено]
r/poltics and r/conservative mods are pedos then
Probably
Those that are immoral are more likely to participate in immoral activities.
Yes. When you're rich and powerful, life gets boring. There's a certain thrill to doing something so taboo and getting away with it, which is why they do it. This is also the reason why Hollywood always takes the side of sexual freedom, to defend their lifestyle.
Whoa buddy, easy on the anti-semitism!
Based
All my authright homies in this thread.
Hey, someone had to bring it up
Good one😂
#🤜🏻🤛🏻
Based
Yes.
Sad but true
I too like Metallica
The unforgiven II
#YOU KNOW ITS SAD BUT TRUE
Isn’t purple also libright? Can someone explain to me the difference
Purple was the original color for LibRight. Then it got changed to yellow and LibRights had a sperg-out over it so the mods kept both. Now purple is just LibRight+repeal the age of consent. And before you ask; no, they’re not actually pedos..or are they?
tbh i think most people just like to roleplay the extreme of their political view or just change it because they find it funny, i am personally not even lib right but i still like to make pedo jokes and the purple flair helps the comedy
Silence, pedophile.
i deserve free speech brother
no
Based
Based commie???!!!
its the same with authcenters going along with the nazi thing, pretty sure most of them are just doing that for le edgy even though their ideologies do fall in authcenter
based and pedopilled
Purple lib right= pedophile
Low effort, high impact
Mr Epstein can I say hi to all of these celebrities on your private jet. I hope I have fun on your island with all these famouse people and I totally won't have something bad happen to me.
I hope you're prepared for an unforgettable luncheon.
Cuties intensifies
cuties was a movie popular with adult men who know the age of consent in every country
Exactly, based btw.
Eat the rich ^Unless ^theyre ^my ^favorite ^celebrities
[удалено]
[удалено]
u/Villezki's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 65. Rank: Concrete Foundation Pills: None I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
Pills?
Pills. As in based and latina single mother pilled.
Ah When was that added to bot
Based
Based and anti-Hollywood-pilled
[удалено]
Holy mary mother of based
Twitter be like.
It was the man behind the Slaughter this entire time