I think op was going for a cum joke.
But also, it's the best way to include scary aspects in articles, although it's often used less effectively than it could be. After all, we fear, above all, the unknown, which isn't something you can utilise well in a medium that's all about knowing a thing.
The list in the excerpt above goes "Blood" before an unnecessary censor, so the audience is primed to imagine that the censor is covering up a *different* bodily fluid. I'd put money down that's the author's intention, at least. Doesn't really matter *what* fluid, anything from "pus" to "breast milk" gets the appropriate gross reaction.
I can't point to any specific examples, but back in the Series I days I remember semi-occasionally seeing redactions and blackboxes used to cover up implications of something crude or sexual in nature, or occasionally even just covering up profanity.
The implication, intentional or not, was that you needed to be above a certain security clearance before the Foundation would let you read forbidden words like "motherfucker" or "semen."
In the linked article, the (unintentional?) implication is that you need one security clearance to know that the SCP has an effect on blood, but a *higher* security clearance to know it ALSO has an effect on saliva! Or maybe the in-universe author was just embarrassed to admit that they ordered a D-class to piss on an anomaly. Neither option feels *quite right* to me.
If I had to guess it’s either
A. a fluid they didn’t test but had it listed for testing but forgot to and accidentally put it in the file
B. A fluid that provided an a different or strange result from the rest either due to the unknown properties of the scp or through an outside factor that may have tampered with the result, so further test is required before they can put it in the file.
C. Another scp, so the data was moved to the cross testing catalog not the scp file.
"other internal bodily fluids" The Foundation redacted it to prevent people asking on how they found that out exactly.
Ugh, yeah, some poor D-Classes had to suffer because of some researcher’s nasty idea.
“You want me to WHAT NOW?!”
it is unnecessary censorship to add artificial mystery, a certified scp classic
I think op was going for a cum joke. But also, it's the best way to include scary aspects in articles, although it's often used less effectively than it could be. After all, we fear, above all, the unknown, which isn't something you can utilise well in a medium that's all about knowing a thing.
It works sometimes.
[It just works](https://youtu.be/YPN0qhSyWy8?t=30)
Either "I wrote etc at the end of the list because I couldn't think of more examples" or "my article looks too tame, I gotta censor some more shit"
C U M
Think about the implications of that answer though
Some poor D-Class: You want me to do what on that?
Gamer girl bath water
Spinal Fluid
I usually imagine it as some kind of cross test with another scp they don't want people to know about
This would make sense if they tried it with SCP-354
[**SCP-354 - The Red Pool**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-354) (+1559) by *Dave Rapp*
[[The water nymph]]
[**SCP-054 The Water Nymph**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/art:scp-054-the-water-nymph) (+18) by *SailorScythe*
The list in the excerpt above goes "Blood" before an unnecessary censor, so the audience is primed to imagine that the censor is covering up a *different* bodily fluid. I'd put money down that's the author's intention, at least. Doesn't really matter *what* fluid, anything from "pus" to "breast milk" gets the appropriate gross reaction. I can't point to any specific examples, but back in the Series I days I remember semi-occasionally seeing redactions and blackboxes used to cover up implications of something crude or sexual in nature, or occasionally even just covering up profanity. The implication, intentional or not, was that you needed to be above a certain security clearance before the Foundation would let you read forbidden words like "motherfucker" or "semen." In the linked article, the (unintentional?) implication is that you need one security clearance to know that the SCP has an effect on blood, but a *higher* security clearance to know it ALSO has an effect on saliva! Or maybe the in-universe author was just embarrassed to admit that they ordered a D-class to piss on an anomaly. Neither option feels *quite right* to me.
nothing, because my mind draws a blank whenever i see that
an x sponge
If I had to guess it’s either A. a fluid they didn’t test but had it listed for testing but forgot to and accidentally put it in the file B. A fluid that provided an a different or strange result from the rest either due to the unknown properties of the scp or through an outside factor that may have tampered with the result, so further test is required before they can put it in the file. C. Another scp, so the data was moved to the cross testing catalog not the scp file.
Oh right the rare "previously explained" SCP, they thought it was just normal piss but it was actually an anomalous yellow colored liquid
It was actually piss 2
Piss 2: electric boogaloo
Milk
Semen Expunged by the request of the Ethics Committe.
This made me laugh so hard.
Clearly it's >![REDACTED]!<
It can safely be assumed that the expunged data is meant to most likely be a long *long* list of other tested materials.
Well if it says “and” it’s probably the last thing anyway.
SCP-999.
[**SCP-999 - The Tickle Monster**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-999) (+2923) by *ProfSnider*
This, is a good answer.
Am I the only one wondering how they figured the ice part?
SCP 232
[**SCP-232 - Jack Proton's Atomic Zapper**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-232) (+241) by *Smapti*
ice cream
The info security and some hazardous information
er, \[DATA EXPUNGED\] of course.
Oh, of course ! [DATA EXPUNGED], I didn't think of it, thx.
Juice that makes your head explode!
tomska reference
CSF
Probably sperm, it's like 80%+ water
out of intrest whats the diffrence between data expunged , and the black boxes
Practically nothing, they're just stylistic differences