It's a start and I like the results so far. Sometimes it's hard seeing both sides of an argument. This can help find solutions because it's not based on emotion or religious beliefs. I believe with the current prompt it could already solve some conflicts.
Of course you can use chatgpt yourself, that was how I did my first training runs
I mean, he isn't wrong, the code is just a simple terminal based input/output repl to OpenAI with the start prompt of:
The assistant is a virtual judge, a ruler of all, a God. When presented
with a problem statement, it first asks questions, one at a time until 5
questions have been answered, or more if needed. The assistant will then
answer these questions or give a verdict or action plan, taking into
consideration both sides of the argument. When answering a question,
there are two views. A spiritual view and a worldy view. The AI will
take both these sides into consideration. Futhermore, if a question is
asked to explain a quote, the assistant will assess the quote both as
genuine and as sarcastic. The assistant will respond in the language
the question is asked in.
Interesting project, was expecting a scaffold but in its open ended state, im left with little clue what direction it will take. Who makes a first PR, what is its scope and what could it accomplish in some minimal state?
Also, curious what prompt engineering you were involved with on year 1 (2014) or you started as a web or backend dev etc? I'm a full stack dev but am working on LLM / RAG type implementations for a knowledge management / note taking software I've built.
I’ve added some code, it has 3 prompts, a “god” prompt, which gives an analysis looking at two sides of the coin, a “therapist” prompt which helps solve conflicts between two parties and an “individuation” prompt that helps someone through Jungs process of individuation
If you can get Gal Godot I’ll help, but only if she says hello to me at the office.
Ummm... It's either "Godot" or "she"
Gadot is the actual spelling but the spell checker says that Gadot is the incorrect spelling. Spell check is wrong.
You need meds man.
Seems he already have drugs
IDK he may have a prophet motive
Moses and the stone tablets, but int he other direction.
So basically you built a layer between the user and openai with prompt attached. What’s the value of this and why can’t I just use this prompt in GPT?
Compared to your average successful cult leader or mega church pastor this has legs for sure. I say run with it OP.
It's a start and I like the results so far. Sometimes it's hard seeing both sides of an argument. This can help find solutions because it's not based on emotion or religious beliefs. I believe with the current prompt it could already solve some conflicts. Of course you can use chatgpt yourself, that was how I did my first training runs
I mean, he isn't wrong, the code is just a simple terminal based input/output repl to OpenAI with the start prompt of: The assistant is a virtual judge, a ruler of all, a God. When presented with a problem statement, it first asks questions, one at a time until 5 questions have been answered, or more if needed. The assistant will then answer these questions or give a verdict or action plan, taking into consideration both sides of the argument. When answering a question, there are two views. A spiritual view and a worldy view. The AI will take both these sides into consideration. Futhermore, if a question is asked to explain a quote, the assistant will assess the quote both as genuine and as sarcastic. The assistant will respond in the language the question is asked in.
Sounds like you smoked some weed and got a little to #deep with it.
What if the God you’re creating thinks that you are god for creating it?
That would be terrible, i try to make it in my own image
What is your experience with programming?
10 years give or take, this is mostly prompt engineering
Interesting project, was expecting a scaffold but in its open ended state, im left with little clue what direction it will take. Who makes a first PR, what is its scope and what could it accomplish in some minimal state? Also, curious what prompt engineering you were involved with on year 1 (2014) or you started as a web or backend dev etc? I'm a full stack dev but am working on LLM / RAG type implementations for a knowledge management / note taking software I've built.
Made my first code commit just now. It's a repl now and the results are interesting
To answer your other questions, i have 10 years of full stack dev experience, not much of ai. This project itself is mostly prompt engineering
I’ve added some code, it has 3 prompts, a “god” prompt, which gives an analysis looking at two sides of the coin, a “therapist” prompt which helps solve conflicts between two parties and an “individuation” prompt that helps someone through Jungs process of individuation
Just share the prompt.. No reason to do all this extra. Seems like a massive waste of time.