T O P

  • By -

f3arl3es

Candidate 2 if the history and examination is focused and relevant, able to come out with sensible differentials which include the diagnosis, and have a good management plan including investigating for differentials If candidate 2 is asking nonsense questions and doing irrelevant examinations, came out with bizarre differentials, then candidate 1 will be better


-Intrepid-Path-

What do you mean by follow up plan? If it's "Idk what's going on with you but come back if things don't get better", then obviously that's poor and candidate 1 is probably doing a better job. If it's "There are a number of things that could be causing your symptoms and I will organise X, Y, Z investigations and see you back in 2 weeks to discuss the results", that's a very different scenario...


nopressure0

I voted candidate 2 on the assumption they did not make a major error and everything they did in the station was clinically relevant and appropriate.


Dwevan

Candidate 2 would likely score better in exams/osce


WatchIll4478

It really depends on how the scoring matrix has been designed, but candidate 2 probably would score better by hitting the points on more domains. In practice the only thing that matters is pass/fail and both would probably get a passing mark..