T O P

  • By -

Word2daWise

How nice - members paid a ton of money to have those buildings constructed (and to have huge gaudy temples built). It's such a comfort to know the cult gets to sell the property and add to the EPA coffers.


Theythinknot

not just paid for it - they most likely helped build it too.


Word2daWise

You're probably right!


DidYouThinkToSmile

And cleaned its toilets too!


Kindly_Note_607

My grandpa was an extremely skilled bricklayer, and he built a church building in our hometown for just the cost of materials.


TheyLiedConvert1980

Exactly. Why not donate to the local community, at the very minimum.


Word2daWise

Yes - why not put it to use as a shelter or service center for those in need? Or a health center?


AZEMT

Because Jesus never said to help others (at least not to my face) - GA logic apparently


Word2daWise

Yeah - Jesus wasn't into that stuff. Not at all.


CrunchyFingernail

If every member of this sub contributed like $25 USD we could buy this and turn it into an exmo church


iguess2789

Now you’re talking


Treasure_Seeker

Bar


The_GreenChemist

I would get in on that for 100$


Worldly-Corgi-1624

For 6.5 million, it probably has a tear down clause. That land has to be worth 5-6 million on its own. ETA, may not have a direct tear down clause, but priced knowing that the buyer will likely be demoing it anyway, and have expenses.


telestialist

On the other hand, they are advertising the fixed chapel seating as one of the property attributes, which could suggest that there is no tear down requirement? The architecture is not as distinctly Mormon as more recent chapels, so they may be willing to let this one slide?


Word2daWise

It does look unlike any chapels I've seen. Maybe the building has serious structural or systems issues, so it's offered "as is" or something?


telestialist

The tear down requirements are so wasteful. There’s a perfectly good building already in place… All of the engineering, grading, materials, architecture … to just tear it down because of Mormon psychological insecurities seems disrespectful to our finite natural resources.


NauvooLegionnaire11

The listing said it was built on 1990. Unlike some of the older structures where there are asbestos or lead paint, this building is clean. The listing also highlight "residential redevelopment" as a use case.


NauvooLegionnaire11

The land is probably worth $7.5. It's listed at $6.5 because it'll cost a million to tear it down and haul away the trash.


BruceBannerOfHeaven

I’m not so sure about that because it does highlight the chapel seating, which would go away if torn down


Worldly-Corgi-1624

Maybe they are discounting/writing off the structure as it is so purpose built to have no general marketable value. Then they can write down the overall value of the property and have a loss.


No_Supermarket_3683

But why then would the ad specifically state the seating capacity?


Worldly-Corgi-1624

in case a McChurch still wanted it for its built purpose. TSCC probably factored in demolition costs as part of the asking price, so maybe not a required tear down.


Bandelo1

From listing: “The seller will reserve mineral rights for the property and will have some Deed restrictions as stated in the Addendum. “ Tear down clause may be in addendum.


Shiz_in_my_pants

>The seller will reserve mineral rights for the property I've noticed in a few listings now that they say they keep the water and mineral rights. I've been been wondering if they've been making money off those somehow.


gmwlid

Went to this building on the mission. It’s where the Spanish ward met. I’ve heard from other people from the mission that wards are consolidating in LA. Even years ago I think only a couple of buildings in this part of town had more than one ward assigned to it.


jabes553

I was thinking it was the Westwood Ward building, but your comment makes me think not.


gmwlid

That building is just behind the temple, I believe.


jabes553

Ah. It's been a while-- decades, and I was quite young! (Lived in LA until I was 5.)


CaliDude72

Nope - it is in Mar Vista.


Plane-Reason9254

Someone needs to buy it and turn it into a cool bar/ club called The Meeting House


Electrical_Toe_9225

I’m down !!!


coniferdamacy

It needs to be replaced by a chapel with the One True Floor Plan. The Holy Ghost can't find its way into your heart if it gets lost in all these non-standard church buildings.


PerceptionOrganic459

It's not the Winchester House


bobdougy

Could it be the Westchester ward?


cojetate

This is my favorite post today! Thank you.


Grimmerrio

I didn't see a teardown clause when I looked through the listing, but some of the investment highlights were interesting. Estimated average income within a 5 mile radius as of 2023 was $174,191. Possible residential infill opportunity. Minimum zoning for housing is 1500 sf and the land is 0.58 AC.


swin62dandi

Thanks for finding this. What I was thinking about as I glanced at the post and wondered.


PackersLittleFactory

Full listing, not sure if this is allowed https://www.loopnet.com/Listing/3655-S-Centinela-Ave-Los-Angeles-CA/32114001/


ForeignCow8547

For a bldg that big in LA, 6.5 mil actually seems pretty cheap. Please, PLEASE someone buy it! What are we gonna do with this weird leftover building?


Word2daWise

Is there a requirement to tear it down? I think that was required in some other sell-offs?


ForeignCow8547

Not sure, but it would be interesting to know.  I was aware of someone in Ogden, Ut whose family had purchased and lived in (as their home) an old Mormon meetinghouse, and I saw a similar HGtv-style home flipper show where a gay couple in the Castro (SF) had remodeled an old LDS meeting space as their home (poetic justice, eh). Salt Lake is full of old Mormon churches repurposed as churches for other orgs (a Buddhist temple, many non-denominational christian churches, etc).  That being said, it wouldn’t surprise me if, based on these experiences, the church had changed its approach at some point and now requires teardown of the old buildings.


Word2daWise

Maybe someone reading this thread can confirm one way or another? I don't live in the Morridor or any of it's offshoots, so my take on it only comes from what I read here. Also, the church might require that (if at all) only on certain buildings or in certain locations. Every single thing it does is calculated to accomplish (or avoid) specific outcomes. Gotta protect that "Good Name" it enjoys, right?


TundraTumbler26

dibs on wrecking that shit


Practical-Term-7600

Just a couple miles from the LA temple. 3624 S. Cintenella Ave, Los Angeles.


No_Supermarket_3683

> Correction: 3655 S. Cintenella Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90066


Practical-Term-7600

Thanks


Eikaiwa

Centinela


w-t-fluff

I'm afraid whoever buys that is going to have to invest in a MUCH taller steeple.


1Searchfortruth

Address? Where is it located?


No_Supermarket_3683

3655 S. Cintenella Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90066


fall_ofthepatriarchy

[r/MormonShrivel](https://www.reddit.com/r/t5_81a61a/s/uWNx5ZQngU)


BabySharkMadness

Is the gym carpeted?


CloudNo446

That’s a nice building. I have only ever seen generic looking wards. If the name wasn’t on the building, I thought it was Catholic.


Datmnmlife

The original buildings in CA actually have a lot of character. I’d love for someone to keep the building up but repurpose it.


Epiemme

I foresee the new Dildopolis Los Angeles location!


Kennyb-Film

Hey I know that building! Use to be the El Sereno Ward long ago. I gave a talk there right after the mission. I hope whoever buys it turns it into a laundromat!