Central powers obviously they have so much more manpower and the Russian army is so horrible the Germans could take Paris in a week and then turn around and take St. Petersburg in 2 weeks
It's all fun and games until the Russian army mobilizes faster than you thought and your Eastern border is threatened while your army is still marching to Paris
Not right now. The Russian army is a bit busy at the moment. And by the time this war is over any military might they had left will be strewn across the sunflower fields of Ukraine. They won’t be up for this war. They haven’t even shown themselves to be as strong as we thought they’d be.
Drying sunflower seeds at higher temperatures helps destroy harmful bacteria. One study found that drying partially sprouted sunflower seeds at temperatures of 122℉ (50℃) and above significantly reduced Salmonella presence.
You do have to take into account the filthy tea drinkers in the north might slow the Germans if they weren’t in the war then yes the Germans could take Paris in 2 hours or less
i said nothing about lenin, i am asking what lenin had to do with a war that was being already lost badly by the tsarist russian empire. he was barely in power before they were pushed back even farther and signed a peace
It was initially a flippant comment, just that Lenin is a massive twat.
But anyway, it didn't help when he seized power and promised a load of bullshit so a lot of the Russian army thought 'ah fuck it, I'm off to grab some free land' and abandoned the effort.......little did they know.
Hey now. Don’t be so hard on Lenin. It wasn’t just him. The other Bolshevik leaders did their part in killing the innocent.
It was a shared mass murder spree. A communal activity.
You may have to violate Belgian Neutrality though. It should be fine, they’re just a bunch of chocolate soldiers who will stand aside as your glorious Army moves through. Shouldn’t need engage in any collective punishment or do anything concerning babies whatsoever.
What level of technology does everybody have and does Russia still have all the nukes in this scenario cuz idk i think no one wins if they still do lmao
Ho Chi Minh was a college student when he went to the treaty of Versailles to petition for Vietnamese independence from Frence Indochina. In 1945 he became Prime Minister, then fought for independence l, driving out the Frence in 1954. That lead to his attempt to unifying Vietnam, which ended up dragging the US into a decade long conflict
No. The Schlieffen Plan was a German plan to invade France via Belgium to get around the Maginot line, which had not yet spanned all of France's borders. The Nazis did a similar tactic in WW2 to again sidestep the Maginot line, but that time going through the Netherlands as well as Belgium
Tbf you really would think so considering the fact that Germany bypassed their border with France in ww1 so their response was to... reinforce their border with Germany prior to ww2 lol. I'm sure there was probably some logic behind it but I can't see it ahaha
In fairness to France, the Maginot was supposed to link up with similar fortification along the entirety of the Benelux countries' boarders with Germany. However, due to economic factors and a myriad of other problems, the Benelux never really got around to building their part of the line.
The logic was the same in WW1 and in WW2 : the French-German border is the most fortified front. That's why the Germans always went through Belgium.
In WW1, Germany going through Belgium meant the UK would get involved quickly, helping France in the long run.
In WW2, Germany had to go through Belgium precisely to avoid the Maginot line, where both the Brits and the French had their most elite troops. The success of the German offensive is due to the crossing of the Ardennes, which isolated the most elite Allied troops in Belgium from the rest of the less elite, less equiped troops in France. This lead to the race to the sea, the Battle of Dunkirk and all that.
1812 was not a stalemate, the US tried to annex Canada while the Canadians and Brits just tried to keep the status quo because an angry corsican was going on a rampage across half of Europe, the Americans failed to annex Canada, got the white house burnt down, which they painted over the damage, hence the name "the white House", won the last battle of the war and then sued for peace after realising they had no chance to actually win the war itself, thus marking it down as a US defeat
And the British had nothing to do with the Americans expansion westward, all that territory that the US murdered their way through west of the colonies was Spanish and, formerly French territory (which had been sold to the US Post French revolution), the British still supported natives that remained within British territory, including the ones that fled North during that manifest destiny fiasco
Ah yes source fuckin Wikipedia, a site known for being editable by readers, and more than likely victim to biased viewpoints in matters such as this, not even surprising it says that considering it was written by a yank who probably had it drilled into their head that 1812 was a "draw"
[actual history is different from propaganda made from wounded pride](https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/british-view-war-1812-quite-differently-americans-do-180951852/)
>they absolutely did, they were allied with tecumseh's confederacy and other native tribes before the war and after the war the alliances were dissolved
The Tecumseh confederacy was a coalition of tribes from all over North America, including tribes from the colonies that had yet to be chased off of their lands, tribes within French and Spanish territory, and the tribes within British-Canada, they weren't specific to the territory now known as the US ya diddy, the British supported it, but they couldn't do anything about the tribes residing outside of their own territory, those ones had to rely on the people who's territory they resided in
>also, you know the louisiana purchase was before 1812 right? it has literally nothing to do with this conflict lmao
Yes, I know that, that's why I said FORMERLY French territory
>so what? i never said otherwise. completely irrelevant to what i said.
My brother in christ it literally directly conflicts with your claim that 1812 ended British support to the natives, which is objectively untrue because those natives were never supported by the British in the first place due to the aforementioned territory issue
>really should read more about a topic before you speak confidently about it
Are you really one to talk?
Allied Powers no contest
Britain and France are the second and third most powerful countries in NATO
I know they're both in the top 10 most powerful nations in the world I think they're number five and six but they might be number four and five
They could probably take on either the other two groups without Russia but then you also give them Russia and some others
Clearly, the Belgian border with France would be undefended.
I would bet the yellow countries would plan to smash an army through the Ardennes, circle Paris, secure their victory in the west, then mobilize their forces faster than the Russians to secure their victory in the east. Easy peasy.
Literally, nothing could go wrong with that plan! I don't see how it could fail.
Sir, i feel your plan is faultless. But… overkill perhaps? We dont actually need to encircle Paris to win and, its not like the French are going to assemble a whole new army West of Paris or something. Lets weaken the flank and we’ll still be sipping coffees on the Champs Elysees in a week…
Hans my dear, we mustn't give the Russians too much time to mobilize! They are a disorganized lot but there are many of them. Why if they assemble their armies in the east will be as done as a firm biscuit!
Though you have a fair point... perhaps worst come, the astro-hungarians will prove faithful and competent allies in their front against the Russians. After all, they did start this by wanting to show Serbia what's what. Surely they wouldn't have begun this whole mess if they weren't prepared!
didnt the ottoman had all important muslim sites at that time? they just need to call out a global jihad against france, great britain and russia in nowadays term
Team Green by a country mile, with aerial dominance through numbers and naval power.
UK and Italy with F35s, the UK with 2 aircraft carriers, Russia has it's 'target practice' air craft carrier to distract everyone from the French's tiny aircraft carriers..
They'd also be able to blockage the English channel AND with Gibralta + Portugal + Italy - own the Mediterranean. It would be a matter of taking out the Spanish. which the UK has a history of doing.
Oh come on, war?? Between these countries??
Haven't you ever heard of the Balance of Power?
Don't you know about that graceful, delicate, morally supreme civilized way in which the European Powers -- governed as they are by superior phrenological endowments -- resolve matters of state in civilized elegance? Ways far beyond the attainment of those ignorant savages who squat in the mud in their primitive squalor?
There is no possible way that some kind of general war would break out between races of such superior capacity. If some scuffle should arise, it would be resolved swiftly and decisively in a genteel way. It would certainly not degenerate into some kind of falling-domino free-for-all, with generations lost to madness, men writhing in mud, screaming unholy profanities with their entrails hanging out, on and on for seemingly an eternity in the manner of the lesser races.
Tush tosh. I say.
From my knowledge as an English fellow, all i used to learn in history was how we beat almost everyone in our empire times because our navy and everyone else in the empire ( Britain only lost to the Americans because we didn't send that much of our army to war because we thought the land was smaller) so i think the United Kingdom
That's not where "Spanish Morocco" is, though, it's right here:
https://preview.redd.it/8klukzqd4v4c1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=ceea9f0d95f45e2f02be09a3fd2cf6bbd883d588
The Purple team of course of course as they have strong Albania. Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Albania & Spain is so overpowered and could conquer all Europe.
Depending on who strikes first or initial attack. Uk is basically demilitarized only having a small standing army. Also being so far away from the central location also means that they would be slow to deploy reinforcement. France is well......France so probably not much help Russia has the manpower but would be at a disadvantage as to many troops to communicate between. Unless they just bumrush the centre and bog em down in urban. Germans have always been organized and meticulous so tbf would lead an epic campaign. Ignoring basically all the atrocity of WW2 they did control a huge area for a relatively small nation. I think it basically boils down to who starts it and who deploys first and where. The neutral nations play a huge role as if they allow troop movement through them then that's clear lines of assault. The seas basically become the biggest battle point as supplies become more difficult to come by. The central forces have enemies on all sides. Would have to take Italy basically straight away to stop bombardment and naval strikes. Take and hold France (not to difficult) but that requires manpower and a fully committed holding force and blockade the UK. Who like i said has a small force but has one of the finest Navy who could begin troop deployment and bombardment as well as aerial support. Russia has old tech but lots of it so numbers over quality. I think it would be a beast of a war. This is all based of just troop based fighting to not electronic or nuclear options.
We're dicks! We're reckless, arrogant, stupid dicks…Pussies don't like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes, assholes who just want to shit on everything.
I can only hope the Central Powers do not breach the borders of the Neutral Nations in order to achieve their goals because that might turn this into a years long massacre.
The Germans maintain themselves out of neutral countries and they annihilate French invasion attempts, and while that’s occupying a quarter of their strength they knock Russian out of the war.
In terms of manpower and quality I think yellow has advantage but in terms of strategy the green alliance has a huge advantage.
My guess, if the cards were well played, the green would win.
Somehow I get the feeling the neutral powers are going to make it out of this war the best. I just feel like things are going to go badly for everyone else. Just a gut feeling
Yellow obviously. Green has foolishly spread out over large, difficult to protect landmasses while yellow has smartly consolidated their power, and is able to pick their opponents off one by one.
Central powers obviously they have so much more manpower and the Russian army is so horrible the Germans could take Paris in a week and then turn around and take St. Petersburg in 2 weeks
Found the Prussian General Staff's account
Noooooo what? You’re insane
Haha yeah where’s the weakest spot in ur trenches
It's all fun and games until the Russian army mobilizes faster than you thought and your Eastern border is threatened while your army is still marching to Paris
Inconceivable.
Schliefen!!?!
More like scheiße
What was the scheiße plan?
Pff nice fanfiction
Not right now. The Russian army is a bit busy at the moment. And by the time this war is over any military might they had left will be strewn across the sunflower fields of Ukraine. They won’t be up for this war. They haven’t even shown themselves to be as strong as we thought they’d be.
Drying sunflower seeds at higher temperatures helps destroy harmful bacteria. One study found that drying partially sprouted sunflower seeds at temperatures of 122℉ (50℃) and above significantly reduced Salmonella presence.
P\*ris 🤮 would only take 2 hours..... otherwise, good point!
You do have to take into account the filthy tea drinkers in the north might slow the Germans if they weren’t in the war then yes the Germans could take Paris in 2 hours or less
Try 2 minutes the fr*nch wouldn't muster a resistance
Wrong. The only way to Paris is through the northern plains and Germany wouldn’t violate Belgian independence to get there
Yeah, invading Belgium would bring Britain into the war, and that would be stupid.
tbh they did fuck up and win over russia
Mostly because Russia fucked up so royally
[удалено]
Not even the worst in Russian history
Well without Lenin, there would be no Stalin. Before these two knob heads I'm not very well versed.
That says so much
how do you make a comment about how the tsar lost the war through his naïveté and incompetence about lenin? lmao
Found the Bolshevik
i said nothing about lenin, i am asking what lenin had to do with a war that was being already lost badly by the tsarist russian empire. he was barely in power before they were pushed back even farther and signed a peace
It was initially a flippant comment, just that Lenin is a massive twat. But anyway, it didn't help when he seized power and promised a load of bullshit so a lot of the Russian army thought 'ah fuck it, I'm off to grab some free land' and abandoned the effort.......little did they know.
Hey now. Don’t be so hard on Lenin. It wasn’t just him. The other Bolshevik leaders did their part in killing the innocent. It was a shared mass murder spree. A communal activity.
Pity Kornilov was a pussy at the beginning, Russia might have been a nicer place today
You may have to violate Belgian Neutrality though. It should be fine, they’re just a bunch of chocolate soldiers who will stand aside as your glorious Army moves through. Shouldn’t need engage in any collective punishment or do anything concerning babies whatsoever.
Thank you,Schlieffen. Sorry if mis spelled
Make sure to randomize your data from time to time *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
What level of technology does everybody have and does Russia still have all the nukes in this scenario cuz idk i think no one wins if they still do lmao
Regardless of the winner, surely such a conflict wouldn't result in the destruction of multiple empires
“I hope this Communist guy doesn’t indirectly cause the utter destruction of my country a few decades down the line!” -Kaiser Wilhelm II
I hope this college student in a French colony doesn't drag my country through a decade long conflict a few decades down the line - Woodrow Wilson
Who is this referring to?
Ho Chi Minh was a college student when he went to the treaty of Versailles to petition for Vietnamese independence from Frence Indochina. In 1945 he became Prime Minister, then fought for independence l, driving out the Frence in 1954. That lead to his attempt to unifying Vietnam, which ended up dragging the US into a decade long conflict
It will probably be done by Christmas.
I’m sure this war won’t forever alter history for the rest of the century
I don't know but i have a feeling that Belgium is not going to be netrual much longer.
Shouldn't have made all that chocolate then should they, they were begging to be taken...
Maginot line be like
Wrong war
No. The Schlieffen Plan was a German plan to invade France via Belgium to get around the Maginot line, which had not yet spanned all of France's borders. The Nazis did a similar tactic in WW2 to again sidestep the Maginot line, but that time going through the Netherlands as well as Belgium
Yes the plans are similar, but I was talking about your use of the term ‘Maginot line’, which was constructed in the 30s.
I apologize, I thought it was the same set of fortifications
Tbf you really would think so considering the fact that Germany bypassed their border with France in ww1 so their response was to... reinforce their border with Germany prior to ww2 lol. I'm sure there was probably some logic behind it but I can't see it ahaha
In fairness to France, the Maginot was supposed to link up with similar fortification along the entirety of the Benelux countries' boarders with Germany. However, due to economic factors and a myriad of other problems, the Benelux never really got around to building their part of the line.
The logic was the same in WW1 and in WW2 : the French-German border is the most fortified front. That's why the Germans always went through Belgium. In WW1, Germany going through Belgium meant the UK would get involved quickly, helping France in the long run. In WW2, Germany had to go through Belgium precisely to avoid the Maginot line, where both the Brits and the French had their most elite troops. The success of the German offensive is due to the crossing of the Ardennes, which isolated the most elite Allied troops in Belgium from the rest of the less elite, less equiped troops in France. This lead to the race to the sea, the Battle of Dunkirk and all that.
Neutral as they have Albania 🇦🇱 strongest country in world
Idk, yellow does contain Bosnia. Maybe if they could convince the Bosnians to defect they could form their own unstoppable faction
As fellow Allah loving Muslim brothers, the Bosnians would rise against Austrian oppression and join Albanias glorious jihad
Inshallah brother
*Artiljerija intensifies*
Green they have Luxembourg
RED AND BLACK I DRESS
ALBANIA 💪🏻🇦🇱💪🏻 #1
least patriotic albanian
I might be called a shit story writer for this but in the end no one wins and a random country not even in the map profits
And it's that country that all its neighbours decided not to resurrect ever again.
Why is Spanish Africa highlighted but no else’s colonies are
Because Spain stronk
Because Spain directly annexed it
Algeria was part of France at that point.
Yeah then I have no idea
Bro has high ping we gotta wait a little for him to load back to the 21st century
Fr\*nce 🤮 would surrender on day 5......
Very funny original joke. Take your freedom fry .
America: Never Lost a War… Just don’t count Korea/Vietnam/Afghanistan
1812
[удалено]
1812 was not a stalemate, the US tried to annex Canada while the Canadians and Brits just tried to keep the status quo because an angry corsican was going on a rampage across half of Europe, the Americans failed to annex Canada, got the white house burnt down, which they painted over the damage, hence the name "the white House", won the last battle of the war and then sued for peace after realising they had no chance to actually win the war itself, thus marking it down as a US defeat And the British had nothing to do with the Americans expansion westward, all that territory that the US murdered their way through west of the colonies was Spanish and, formerly French territory (which had been sold to the US Post French revolution), the British still supported natives that remained within British territory, including the ones that fled North during that manifest destiny fiasco
[удалено]
Ah yes source fuckin Wikipedia, a site known for being editable by readers, and more than likely victim to biased viewpoints in matters such as this, not even surprising it says that considering it was written by a yank who probably had it drilled into their head that 1812 was a "draw" [actual history is different from propaganda made from wounded pride](https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/british-view-war-1812-quite-differently-americans-do-180951852/) >they absolutely did, they were allied with tecumseh's confederacy and other native tribes before the war and after the war the alliances were dissolved The Tecumseh confederacy was a coalition of tribes from all over North America, including tribes from the colonies that had yet to be chased off of their lands, tribes within French and Spanish territory, and the tribes within British-Canada, they weren't specific to the territory now known as the US ya diddy, the British supported it, but they couldn't do anything about the tribes residing outside of their own territory, those ones had to rely on the people who's territory they resided in >also, you know the louisiana purchase was before 1812 right? it has literally nothing to do with this conflict lmao Yes, I know that, that's why I said FORMERLY French territory >so what? i never said otherwise. completely irrelevant to what i said. My brother in christ it literally directly conflicts with your claim that 1812 ended British support to the natives, which is objectively untrue because those natives were never supported by the British in the first place due to the aforementioned territory issue >really should read more about a topic before you speak confidently about it Are you really one to talk?
[удалено]
Korea no one lost it was a stalemate
[удалено]
Who is in control of the Afghanistan government?
[удалено]
The Taliban running the country the US invaded and established their own democracy in is irrelevant… So what was accomplished?
[удалено]
From US Intelligence in Pakistan… The very same group that gave him safe haven governs the country. L
France when having to fight anyone else: 🫣🥺 France when it involves the USA & Britain: 👹
That’s too generous, Fr*nce 🤮 wouldn’t last that long
Yep, I was trying to be kind to them, also bearing in mind they are largely incapable of speedy decision making.....
By the time they decided to mobilize their army Paris would have already fallen
Modern France could take Germany.
That’s no great achievement…. 🤣🤣 So could Lichtenstein by the way and Ethiopia and Kazakhstan.
Don't worry, just move to neutral Belgium
Allied Powers no contest Britain and France are the second and third most powerful countries in NATO I know they're both in the top 10 most powerful nations in the world I think they're number five and six but they might be number four and five They could probably take on either the other two groups without Russia but then you also give them Russia and some others
As shit as it maybe don't the UK and France have all the nukes?
Switzerland
Clearly, the Belgian border with France would be undefended. I would bet the yellow countries would plan to smash an army through the Ardennes, circle Paris, secure their victory in the west, then mobilize their forces faster than the Russians to secure their victory in the east. Easy peasy. Literally, nothing could go wrong with that plan! I don't see how it could fail.
Sir, i feel your plan is faultless. But… overkill perhaps? We dont actually need to encircle Paris to win and, its not like the French are going to assemble a whole new army West of Paris or something. Lets weaken the flank and we’ll still be sipping coffees on the Champs Elysees in a week…
Hans my dear, we mustn't give the Russians too much time to mobilize! They are a disorganized lot but there are many of them. Why if they assemble their armies in the east will be as done as a firm biscuit! Though you have a fair point... perhaps worst come, the astro-hungarians will prove faithful and competent allies in their front against the Russians. After all, they did start this by wanting to show Serbia what's what. Surely they wouldn't have begun this whole mess if they weren't prepared!
Idk, but I’m 100% sure whatever the result is that it’ll be over before Christmas
didnt the ottoman had all important muslim sites at that time? they just need to call out a global jihad against france, great britain and russia in nowadays term
Team Green by a country mile, with aerial dominance through numbers and naval power. UK and Italy with F35s, the UK with 2 aircraft carriers, Russia has it's 'target practice' air craft carrier to distract everyone from the French's tiny aircraft carriers.. They'd also be able to blockage the English channel AND with Gibralta + Portugal + Italy - own the Mediterranean. It would be a matter of taking out the Spanish. which the UK has a history of doing.
Whatever happens, this hypothetical war would be so awful that we surely wouldn't see another war of this scale for a long time
It may even be so bad that people would no longer want to fight. The war to end all wars?
Central powers would probably win if they make sure not to disturb Europe's sleeping bear, Belgium
3 nuclear powers on one side... that's game over.
Blue, it has so much more land.
Portugal 🇵🇹
An all star wrestling match with the leaders of each country punching it out::viewed from the comfort of your home for €295
Idk but it’d be a great war either way
finally, some nice fucking color palette
Spain. Because nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.
86 percent of the planet GB don't need the rest we have won this game a long time ago and gave most countries back. Next.
Call me crazy, but i have a feeling Italy gonna switch sides.
On which side is Ukraine? That will answer your question..
Britain, France and Russia have nukes, and they're on the same side. The war wouldn't go too well for the others.
Expect France to automatically surrender
GB would legitimately win this solo
Oh come on, war?? Between these countries?? Haven't you ever heard of the Balance of Power? Don't you know about that graceful, delicate, morally supreme civilized way in which the European Powers -- governed as they are by superior phrenological endowments -- resolve matters of state in civilized elegance? Ways far beyond the attainment of those ignorant savages who squat in the mud in their primitive squalor? There is no possible way that some kind of general war would break out between races of such superior capacity. If some scuffle should arise, it would be resolved swiftly and decisively in a genteel way. It would certainly not degenerate into some kind of falling-domino free-for-all, with generations lost to madness, men writhing in mud, screaming unholy profanities with their entrails hanging out, on and on for seemingly an eternity in the manner of the lesser races. Tush tosh. I say.
From my knowledge as an English fellow, all i used to learn in history was how we beat almost everyone in our empire times because our navy and everyone else in the empire ( Britain only lost to the Americans because we didn't send that much of our army to war because we thought the land was smaller) so i think the United Kingdom
bc Germany has never beat the UK and France before
Allies, in fact it would be so easy we’d be home by christmas.
Still crazy to me to think about how the Ottoman Empire participated in WWI
Germany if they don't send a letter to Mexico
Man, what an interesting scenario this would be. Good thing this could never happen in real life...right?
The undertaker
Franz Ferdinand seems like a guy who can win this. He should get right on it when he comes back from his Sarajevo holiday
Can't say for sure until we know what side Iceland is on
Russia shouldn't be green. It's like a hobo you cash roll to shank someone.
🤣🤣
Which ever side the Brits are on, as always.
Blue
Allied powers. Especially when you add in America.
U.S.A. and our weapons market. We’ll make a tab for Ya’ll. 🏈🌭🍺
That's not where "Spanish Morocco" is, though, it's right here: https://preview.redd.it/8klukzqd4v4c1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=ceea9f0d95f45e2f02be09a3fd2cf6bbd883d588
green, but I dont think russia is going to make it
Poland
Poland, it had the biggest teritorial gains so it won right
The Purple team of course of course as they have strong Albania. Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Albania & Spain is so overpowered and could conquer all Europe.
Fr🤮nce doesn’t count as a cobelligerent since they will surrender in 1 day
Fucking cockroaches that's what.
America, according to Americans
ovviously ireland
So you put France and Montenegro, and no Poland? Kurwa.
What happend to poland?
Dun-dun… dun-dun… dun-dun-dun-dun-dun America fuck yeah!
The entente (Allied Powers) because America
Whoever Albania decides to join
Which team does the US side with?
Depending on who strikes first or initial attack. Uk is basically demilitarized only having a small standing army. Also being so far away from the central location also means that they would be slow to deploy reinforcement. France is well......France so probably not much help Russia has the manpower but would be at a disadvantage as to many troops to communicate between. Unless they just bumrush the centre and bog em down in urban. Germans have always been organized and meticulous so tbf would lead an epic campaign. Ignoring basically all the atrocity of WW2 they did control a huge area for a relatively small nation. I think it basically boils down to who starts it and who deploys first and where. The neutral nations play a huge role as if they allow troop movement through them then that's clear lines of assault. The seas basically become the biggest battle point as supplies become more difficult to come by. The central forces have enemies on all sides. Would have to take Italy basically straight away to stop bombardment and naval strikes. Take and hold France (not to difficult) but that requires manpower and a fully committed holding force and blockade the UK. Who like i said has a small force but has one of the finest Navy who could begin troop deployment and bombardment as well as aerial support. Russia has old tech but lots of it so numbers over quality. I think it would be a beast of a war. This is all based of just troop based fighting to not electronic or nuclear options.
America
We're dicks! We're reckless, arrogant, stupid dicks…Pussies don't like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes, assholes who just want to shit on everything.
The Americans lol
Green
Yellow Since i live there
draw
allied defo cus russia powerfull
Ethiopia
Tunisia
the allies won once. which means win number two would be almost guaranteed
The Neutral Nations, because the best way to win a war is to never have it
Algeria solos
Just in case nobody knows, Ireland is “neutral “ and also not part of britian
This subreddit never fails to offend me by lumping Ireland in with the UK 😂
Is Tan … super neutral?
Tunisia solos
Sweden would /kill @e[type=Allies, type=Central_Powers]
I will
probably blue. it looks like it would be the biggest if you zoomed out
Honestly I think the central powers would win, if the entente doesn't have their colonies or the US
The Neutral Nations, if they wait long enough. Then we change colour...
I can only hope the Central Powers do not breach the borders of the Neutral Nations in order to achieve their goals because that might turn this into a years long massacre.
The ocean nations
Beige
Neutral nations, Switzerland makes all bleed and then everyone strikes
Whatever happens, we all know it will over before Christmas
The Germans maintain themselves out of neutral countries and they annihilate French invasion attempts, and while that’s occupying a quarter of their strength they knock Russian out of the war.
The Mediterranean Sea wins
The North-African powers
Africa
In terms of manpower and quality I think yellow has advantage but in terms of strategy the green alliance has a huge advantage. My guess, if the cards were well played, the green would win.
Probably result in a deadlock unless someone pulls in the WW GOAT
Light blue has more land and has already encircled some areas.
With or without outside intervention?
Allied oceans
Green, but just because invasion of britain is so difficult and the allies can starve central powers of many resources
Why isn’t Spain split in two?
purple team
Spain.
Probably Africa
Hey Germany.. the people of Denmark just want to remind you about our neutrality and what it means
What is Russia? Why we making pseudo nation maps?
Neutral powers
Neutral of course. Everybody loses in a war
Somehow I get the feeling the neutral powers are going to make it out of this war the best. I just feel like things are going to go badly for everyone else. Just a gut feeling
Green has Luxembourg so they automatically win
I hate those filthy Neutrals. With enemies you know where they stand but with Neutrals, who knows? It sickens me.
Obviously Shqiperia you fools!1!!!1!1!!!
Poland
Muslims. Europe their best people is that war, and never really recovered.
Yellow obviously. Green has foolishly spread out over large, difficult to protect landmasses while yellow has smartly consolidated their power, and is able to pick their opponents off one by one.