Tarantino to start, insisting on rewriting the existing IPs to focus on a new hero of his own creation: Foot-Man. The Foot-Man character is a racist and Taratino insists on playing him himself.
Cameron to take over the mantle for Foot-Man 2: 20,000 Feet Under the Sea. Cameron ignores the previous movie and all Marvel properties, instead lifting ideas from popular science fiction novels and children's stories. The movie includes a 45 minute sequence that references all of Cameron's previous films.
Finally, Peter Jackson leads the franchise directly into the uncanny valley, with Foot-Man now accompanied by his trusty sidekick: The Horrified Ghost of John Lennon.
All three films make a trillion dollars at the box office.
Well, I guess Tarantino mostly makes movies small, while Peter Jackson is today renowned for massive epics and James Cameron... I guess he also does movies big, these days.
So, in this sense it would have to be:
1. Tarantino does a more contained movie where the characters don't really understand the implications of what they're grappling with
2. James Cameron reveals the true meaning of the events of the first film
3. Peter Jackson realises the true scale of the movie
So, for example:
1. Doctor Doom sets up the Hood as a fall guy; the Hood plays his part perfectly and the Avengers accidentally play into Doom's hands by dealing with the Hood
2. Having figured out Doom's end goal, a group of heroes try to use the power of science fiction to subvert Doom's plan but ultimately Jack of Hearts realises they can't and sacrifices himself so they'll live to fight another day
3. Thanks to Jack's sacrifice, our surviving sci-fi heroes find themselves in a fantasy world ruled by God Emperor Doom and end up joining a rebellion led by a familiar face
[удалено]
[удалено]
Is that what it is? Feel bad for some of these younger kids who have completely worthless parents that also don’t help
> Are the mods just giving up now? You posted three minutes after OP but yeah go off
[удалено]
The irony of this comment
[удалено]
Lol didn't thing about that problem. Would you replace him with another director?
Tarantino to start, insisting on rewriting the existing IPs to focus on a new hero of his own creation: Foot-Man. The Foot-Man character is a racist and Taratino insists on playing him himself. Cameron to take over the mantle for Foot-Man 2: 20,000 Feet Under the Sea. Cameron ignores the previous movie and all Marvel properties, instead lifting ideas from popular science fiction novels and children's stories. The movie includes a 45 minute sequence that references all of Cameron's previous films. Finally, Peter Jackson leads the franchise directly into the uncanny valley, with Foot-Man now accompanied by his trusty sidekick: The Horrified Ghost of John Lennon. All three films make a trillion dollars at the box office.
Well, I guess Tarantino mostly makes movies small, while Peter Jackson is today renowned for massive epics and James Cameron... I guess he also does movies big, these days. So, in this sense it would have to be: 1. Tarantino does a more contained movie where the characters don't really understand the implications of what they're grappling with 2. James Cameron reveals the true meaning of the events of the first film 3. Peter Jackson realises the true scale of the movie So, for example: 1. Doctor Doom sets up the Hood as a fall guy; the Hood plays his part perfectly and the Avengers accidentally play into Doom's hands by dealing with the Hood 2. Having figured out Doom's end goal, a group of heroes try to use the power of science fiction to subvert Doom's plan but ultimately Jack of Hearts realises they can't and sacrifices himself so they'll live to fight another day 3. Thanks to Jack's sacrifice, our surviving sci-fi heroes find themselves in a fantasy world ruled by God Emperor Doom and end up joining a rebellion led by a familiar face