> Hospitals are not allowed to make a single hiring decision without the approval of Te Whatu Ora's head office, including for cleaners and administration staff.
> It means it somewhere like Southland Hopsital wants to replace a nurse, that decision has to go a long way up the chain - and the country - for approvals.
... seems fine. No issues there. This definitely won't delay the deployment of necessary staff /s
Remember when the former chief of Te Whatu Ora was forced to step down for criticising National in a Tweet?
Jokes about freedom of speech aside, the fact they were replaced by a Patsy is pretty grim and pretty damning.
If Labour had of done the same we'd never hear the end of it .
It was the chairman of the board - not the chief executive. Labour sacked him and appointed the current chair (who has just resigned but not yet been replaced).
So what are you on about?
No cuts to frontline services? Sure.....
Ah, **more red tape** from the Parties of "cutting red tape".
Red tape to reign in business vs red tape to cut public services... Totally different.
This is a sign in the private sector fcor when you should start looking for a different job.
This is actually the stupidest thing I have ever read. This is what you get when you try to run a country like a business.
> Hospitals are not allowed to make a single hiring decision without the approval of Te Whatu Ora's head office, including for cleaners and administration staff. > It means it somewhere like Southland Hopsital wants to replace a nurse, that decision has to go a long way up the chain - and the country - for approvals. ... seems fine. No issues there. This definitely won't delay the deployment of necessary staff /s
Great use of exec time
Remember when the former chief of Te Whatu Ora was forced to step down for criticising National in a Tweet? Jokes about freedom of speech aside, the fact they were replaced by a Patsy is pretty grim and pretty damning. If Labour had of done the same we'd never hear the end of it .
It was the chairman of the board - not the chief executive. Labour sacked him and appointed the current chair (who has just resigned but not yet been replaced). So what are you on about?
I misremembered something. My apologies. Highlights how piss weak Labour are politically though.
The angry mob still upvoted you though so turns out you can say any old thing.👍
Fits the narrative.