T O P

  • By -

gogo94210

How about you start interacting with some bitches instead


ThePhantom1994

We’re in the wrong standard model. My particles don’t interact with the bitches field


queenbiscuit311

the secret is to make the bitches field interact with your particles


ThePhantom1994

But the only way to do that is for my particles to convert to the highly unstable Chad quark, which can then interact with bitches boson. This transformation requires a particle accelerator


Uberninja2016

or to poison people and buy up all the antidote some folks say it's illegal, but on the other hand it really is


MinusPi1

> My particles C'mon, your balls aren't *that* small


jack101yello

Isn’t only like 1% of the mass of atoms from the Higgs Mechanism?


Rotsike6

Yeah. The Higgs field is what gives elementary particles their mass. An atom mostly gets its mass from binding energy and stuff.


jsdsparky

Gluon has entered the chat


INeedHealing88

Could be, I don't know, my brain stopped interacting with the intelligence field ;(


nameisprivate

yeah most of the mass is binding energy but massless particles don't get in bound states so no higgs mechanism -> no mass


Select_Stupid_Host

You stupd idiot!!!111 The vast majority (>99%) of the mass of ordinary matter comes from the binding energy of the composite particles, not the particles themselves > The Higgs boson does not technically give other particles mass. More precisely, the particle is a quantized manifestation of a field (the Higgs field) that generates mass through its interaction with other particles. > The more strongly a particle interacts with the Higgs field, the more massive it is. It’s important to note, however, that most of the mass in composite particles, like protons, nuclei, and atoms, does not come from the Higgs mechanism, but from the binding energy that holds these particles together. From: https://physics.aps.org/articles/v6/111


Select_Stupid_Host

🤓🤓


Username_Taken_65

Man really just 🤓🤓'd themself


Prunestand

> You stupd idiot!!!111 > > The vast majority (>99%) of the mass of ordinary matter comes from the binding energy of the composite particles, not the particles themselves > > > The Higgs boson does not technically give other particles mass. More precisely, the particle is a quantized manifestation of a field (the Higgs field) that generates mass through its interaction with other particles. > > > The more strongly a particle interacts with the Higgs field, the more massive it is. It’s important to note, however, that most of the mass in composite particles, like protons, nuclei, and atoms, does not come from the Higgs mechanism, but from the binding energy that holds these particles together. > > From: https://physics.aps.org/articles/v6/111 They really fooled themselves here


boltzmannman

You'd be 199 lbs


Golokopitenko

You'd be 198 you dumb fucking cretin, you fucking fool, absolute fucking buffoon, you bumbling fucking idiot. Fuck you.


boltzmannman

There are several bombs embedded in your floor


Golokopitenko

I would like to apologize


Dhuyf2p

One thing still bothers me. Why not use Newton for weight? I thought pound is used for mass? Edit: Sorry I’m not American/Canadian/British and know nothing about the Imperial unit.


nameisprivate

weight measurements are done in natural units where g=1 so pounds/kg becomes a unit of weight ✨


INeedHealing88

The reason is the original is an unfunny Facebook post https://www.reddit.com/r/terriblefacebookmemes/comments/dh77fs/youre_not_on_the_wrong_planet_youre_just_fat/


penisofablackman

Discovering a way to manipulate the Higgs field will be one of the greatest achievements of mankind in terms of mobility. Imagine if you could make a container ship full of goods weigh less than 20 lbs. you could strap a jet to it and fly it from Shenzhen to San Diego in hours. Imaging making a spacecraft weightless. You could literally float it up to the edge of the atmosphere before using a single drop of fuel. How about making a car with occupants weigh less than a drone. Jetsons cars baby! And don’t forget it could work backwards too. You want the space station to have gravity? Boom! You got it!


INeedHealing88

Most likely everything inside the changed field would fall apart an everybody inside would die. Life is very sensitive to changes of fundamental constants. This wouldn't revolutionise transportation, this would create another weapon. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_universe#Examples


penisofablackman

Why such a lack of vision? A solution to that problem is fairly simple depending on how far the Higgs field can be manipulated. If you can take it negative would be ideal. You would have an isolated container where the Higgs field would be adjustable. Think like a flat cell at the bottom of a car (or maybe at the top) filled with some material determined to be optimal for this. And the controller of the cell could turn the Higgs up or down as needed. And going negative essentially means anti-gravity. You can go negative by the same weight as the car and it’s occupants making the net weight zero. The car should float.


Prunestand

> Most likely everything inside the changed field would fall apart an everybody inside would die. Life is very sensitive to changes of fundamental constants. This wouldn't revolutionise transportation, this would create another weapon. > > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_universe#Examples Great, I want to die.


youaregoingoffline

No you’re wrong read the other comments ):


that_idioticgenius

What was the original


INeedHealing88

https://i.redd.it/zph5bnera9s31.jpg