As everyone is aware, our judicial system is a perfect machine and there is no chance someone is charged with something when they did not do it. We learned from OJ. Using that sound logic, it is only acceptable to conclude that you must return with a verdict of *guilty*. Unless it is a huge celebrity and you can write a tell-all book about finding them not guilty because you were the one juror who *knew* they didn't do it. Then you make millions of dollars before optioning the movie rights and that becomes a massive success.
Well, first you need to form a hypothesis. Then you need to test that hypothesis, presumably by attending the trial, and then repeat it a few times to make sure it wasn't a fluke. So make sure to demand a retrial a few times. Then you'll need a control trial, so maybe reference a trial where the defendant was definitely innocent, though the ideal would be to falsely accusing the current defendent of a crime and then put them on trial. Finally, you should be able to scientifically draw a conclusion after observing the results.
Depends, are they hot?
Also, try to casually mention as one of their lawyers go by that you would do anything for 10k. That debt is crippling you and 10k would be enough to change you right now.
Well remember that they are innocent before being proven guilty. They start out innocent, and then theyre proven guilty, so I say just skip the middle man and say guilty.
Guilty. Better safe than sorry.
Innocent doesn’t mean they didn’t do it. Go for the death penalty. It’s the safest way to go.
Guilty guilty guilty i hope he's innocent too
As everyone is aware, our judicial system is a perfect machine and there is no chance someone is charged with something when they did not do it. We learned from OJ. Using that sound logic, it is only acceptable to conclude that you must return with a verdict of *guilty*. Unless it is a huge celebrity and you can write a tell-all book about finding them not guilty because you were the one juror who *knew* they didn't do it. Then you make millions of dollars before optioning the movie rights and that becomes a massive success.
can you rewrite this post? i don't "get it".
Scientifically speaking, guilty. Fraudulently speaking, innocent.
Scientifically speaking, this is a schrodinger's cat situation. Until you decide as a juror, the suspect is both innocent and guilty.
[REDACTED]
Death penalty!!!!!
Depends. Is it a scientist that is on trial? If so, did he speak? If so, did it sound scientific?
Well, first you need to form a hypothesis. Then you need to test that hypothesis, presumably by attending the trial, and then repeat it a few times to make sure it wasn't a fluke. So make sure to demand a retrial a few times. Then you'll need a control trial, so maybe reference a trial where the defendant was definitely innocent, though the ideal would be to falsely accusing the current defendent of a crime and then put them on trial. Finally, you should be able to scientifically draw a conclusion after observing the results.
Guilty! And give the bastard the CHAIR!! Take pics for us.
Show up for jury duty with a rope that has a noose and tell the judge you're all set for jury duty.
_straight to jail_
Tell the judge you want a promotion. You can judge too!
Guilty. Sometimes the jury is enough of a reality bitch slap for the defendant to plea bargain.
Better call Saul
The only scientific method that works in these situations is the coin toss.
If you declare that every DA is a horrible scumbag they wont make you be on the jury anymore! You can thank me later.
guilty. death by firing squad
Both, cuz why not
Innocent. You won't burn in hell that way
Always guilty, the justice system never makes mistakes.
Better to have an innocent man in jail than to have a murderer on the street. Guilty
Guilty! Straight to the gallows.
Iunlcy
Innocent of being guilty of being innocent.
Depends, are they hot? Also, try to casually mention as one of their lawyers go by that you would do anything for 10k. That debt is crippling you and 10k would be enough to change you right now.
Hmm scientifically speaking, acquitted
Walk into the court yelling guilty so they know you're serious
They are both innocent and guilty until you open the box and release the cat
Everyone is guilty of something
Are you in America? There’s probably a chart on the wall that’s like a Guide based on colours.
Well remember that they are innocent before being proven guilty. They start out innocent, and then theyre proven guilty, so I say just skip the middle man and say guilty.
Always guilty, unless they're in the mob or something and you can get paid for an innocent verdict
guilificent
Absolutely 100% guilty your honour.
Criminal court?
Is it Trump?