Make sure to check out the [pinned post on Loss](https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1472nhh/faq_loss/) to make sure this submission doesn't break the rule!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke) if you have any questions or concerns.*
She pops up explaining that states have added new harsher age verification for porn sites when you visit porn hub. Porn hub and some other adult sites stopped letting people onto them because its almost impossible to age verify someone on the internet
I'm in Utah, and a person has to upload a copy of their driver's license under the new age verification rules. I don't know what the rule is in other states. In response, the hub shut down operation here. This has led to a rather huge upswing in VPN usage here.
This is a meth pipe.
Crack you smoke with a direct flame or a torch. Crack pipes are straight and they use a little piece of chore boy in the end as a filter.
Meth you use indirect heat and you swirl the pipe around. The meth turns into an oil and you lightly hit the bottom of the pipe with a flame.
Meth pipe has the bulb, because you want to heat up and not burn the meth.
Crack pipe is a tube with a filter (usually steel wool) because you need to burn crack.
I asked the same question once.
While not on this particular issue, Florida's lawmaker who had millions in stocks for drug testing companies passed a law (that was later deemed unconstitutional) that required welfare recipients to be drug tested. This law did not save the state any money, it actually costed them as the testing was more expensive than the money they didn't give to a few recipients. He transfered his stocks to his wife to try and hide the obvious conflict of interest.
So while it may or may not have happened here, it absolutely does happen
Here's a bit of a long read for a source on my example:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/judystone/2015/02/17/the-sham-of-drug-testing-walker-scott-and-political-pandering/
I mean yeah, people should absolutely call it out when it does happen.
But that doesn’t mean it’s okay for people to just make shit up and spread disinformation.
It is really REALLY damaging to society. The whole "vaccines cause autism" thing happened because a guy published a BS paper saying there was a link between the MMR vaccine and autism and then he was going to say that HIS version of the MMR vaccine doesn't cause autism so he could make lots of money.
So kids are dying from preventable diseases because some asshole wanted to make lots of money.
Actually the money is coming from the people running the verification services.
It's actually being done fairly out in the open, basically it's traffic cameras all over again. They paid to get their cameras up there. They did nothing to improve road safety and did everything to generate a bunch of money for the people placing the cameras.
*knocks on door*
"How can I help you Officer?"
"Well sir, you mind explaining what the hell this is?"
*shows search history of uniform cop porn*
"Uhhh, fuck the police?"
How is that faring with people? In terms of- is this sort of thing getting on people’s nerves enough to have an electoral impact?
I feel like at the local level these things matter, like I remember in my home country in São Paulo, people were irate when the mayor reduced the speed limit rules at night to reduce traffic deaths a few years back. The way people spoke, it was one the main grievances and he may have lost the election on that issue alone.
If people falling into poverty hasnt had one I dont see how this will
Especially considering how little impact the average voter seems to have nowadays
At local level you have so much more impact though, and your vote matters so much more. Like in Utah the governor primary in the gop was decided by 40k votes.
And how much impact in grand politics does a local gov have?
(Genuine question because over here all they do is on the level of deciding parking fees and rubber stamping construction projects)
A state governor has a LOT of impact on how your life is in an individual state.
For example, many states are now passing anti-abortion laws. Without a governor to sign those into power, the laws will not pass. A democrat governor in that state, could veto that law for the state, and unless the legislature for the state can over-ride the veto, the law will not go into effect.
The governor for each state is like a mini-president for that individual state.
Local politics is generally very impactful in your day to day life. Fixing potholes and/or speeding or local housing regulations are all very tangible effects that impact your day to day life, more than foreign policy.
On average (there are exceptional moments and exceptional decisions), local politics has a bigger impact in your day to day life than national politics. It’s just definitely not as sexy.
Like think about it: traffic while unsexy, has a major impact on your life. If you manage to cut out half of your commute in terms of time, that’s like a large amount of extra time in your day you get back. And that’s a local issue,
I would argue the difference is how and who the impact is being directed. Policies causing poverty are largely debated and indirect on how those policies cause it, leading to easy passing of the blame. It also only directly affects a subset of individuals.
Meanwhile, this policy is caused by specific politicians and directly connected from the policy to the result. In addition, this policy is something that is affecting everyone that wants to access the content, which is bigger than what politicians would have you believe. It doesn't matter if you are homeless with a phone connected to a restaurants wi-fi or Scrooge McDuck in your McMansion, it will affect you. With the various sites having their own messages listing why you cannot access them, they are in effect campaigning directly to their userbase to vote out the politicians who did this.
tldr: Poverty is hard to connect to politicians and does not directly impact as many people as this policy does
Ppl aren't rly bothered from what I've understood. Ppl that are looking for free porn aren't exactly concerned with how they get it. Shadier sites & VPNs that shirk the laws make getting free porn accessable still enough that the masses happy.
And it's not hitting all sites, just the sites that have sunk a substantial amount of cash in their site like pornhub. Xhampster had this video for a while, but they caved to age verification. Safer sites like those have more to lose from implementation of ID verification - the states that require ID *want* the big sites to fuck up so they can be made examples of. Meanwhile, shadier sites like Xvideo DGAF bc their servers are prolly off in a country that DGAF & state government can't touch them.
I'm kinda curious about how this is going to look in a post Proj '25 Merika bc I can totally see the GOP attempting to make this a federal law. Then they *could* do things like shutdown VPNs & have the FBI do server raids on the shadier sites like they did over copyright strikes.
This is part of the problem, sites like Pornhub and others that have verification requirements and a safe browsing experience will obey the law, but sketchier sites full of malware, hosted internationally, and hosting child SA content won't.
The government isn't "protecting kids from porn" but rather financially punishing porn creators and sites that play by the rules and funneling users toward illegal content.
How do you keep people focused on an unwinnable cause? Declare 'war' on something vague like drugs or immorality. You can then cherry pick the examples that target the demographic you want to target.
Indiana just tried the same thing but a judge blocked it and called it unconstitutional, hopefully it'll get resolved in favor of the common folk and set a precedent for the other states trying to enact this madness.
It's not that it's impossible to age verify someone. It's more of a huge invasion of privacy. What if the system gets hacked and everyone's id's get leaked out on the internet?
Pornhub is just dealing with the law in a way that won't open them up to future law suits.
It's also just neither financially nor technologically advantageous for them to make the changes. Adding an age verification system connected to Govt issued ID is wildly expensive and requires a lot of infrastructure inconsistent with a video hosting website
Well, in general, if you make these laws, it should be the government to create the necessary infrastructure to enable age verification.
Take for example ther German eID. Even though this system is hardly ever used, it provides an easy and accessible system for age verification. If you have your ID (which you are required to own by law) a card reader and your PIN for the ID, a website can send a simple age verification request to the governmental issued program for access to the eID.
That program is designed to give a simple "yes/no" answer to the age verification request. There is no additional information given out beyond a "younger or older than 18", this minimising the security risk for data leaking.
It certainly is. Project 2025 aims to make porn illegal and then you can selectively target your enemies while pretending it's for moral reasons. It's basically the criminalization of weed repackaged.
And that's if PornHub leaks. I imagine [horseporn.com](http://horseporn.com) would have laxer security standards, and a lot of us would be way more interested to see who goes *there*.
^(BTW, checked the site to see if it was real. It is. It is weird but SFW.)
I can remember that someone ran a dating website for married people looking for an affair. The data were deliberately not very well protected because the owner used them as blackmail material.
Even worse; if the your I.D can be linked with what you have been watching.
Look... we have all looked at some weird shit on pornhub late at night when bored.
It's more that it costs money to implement age verification.
And that money is lost when most people just search for sites that don't verify instead.
They did it once, it just didn't work financially.
It's actually suuuuuper easy... They can just have a splash page that asks "are you 18?... Yes, (if you lie, we'll know and report you to the police and your mom) or No, GTFO here kid"
It's literally foolproof.
Right!? Why would people be getting mad at the person who is telling you what your state and local government is forcing you to do. Get mad at your politicians not the citizens who actively opposing their dumb laws
She’s been nothing but good to me in the past. I get why she’s doing what she’s doing. The whole things is bullshit. Especially since these laws were put in place by Trump supporters…and Trump literally paid to have sex with a porn star. It doesn’t bother them when their dear leader is out there being “immoral”, but for any regular person to have access to porn is a bridge too far apparently.
Funny how it's all the rightwing, protecting yer free speech states.
Almost like they be lying about that. That the only speech they want to protect is the speech they use everyday.
Freedom! *Unless you want to masturbate, get an abortion, have any sexual but heterosexual, have any religion apart from Christianity or have any anonymity online*
This is Cherie DeVille, and in states where PornHub is blocked instead of whatever spicy video you wanted to watch you get a video of her explaining why PornHub decided to block you instead.
Edit: Come on guys, it's a Google search away.
https://youtu.be/09Ovt2t6SgQ?si=MKA3uFOzKD92k_Oa
It would be just perfect for the people who weren't paying attention to politics to blame the woman telling them who's responsible instead of the people she's warning them about, wouldn't it?
Now I'm curious about what she has to say to that would be important enough to show rather than just show an error screen of some kind. Any sauce for that video?
Yeah, pornhub dot com. Just do it from a state that blocks it.
It goes into detail about how blocking pornography isn't a solution, and to contact your legislature to get the bans repealed.
Can't wait until I open up a Playboy and get greeted with: "Hi, I'm Cherie DeVille. As you may know, you're elected officials have required us to verify your age before granting you access to this content."
Dude. I live in Commiefornia too. It hurts being oppressed that my boss has to pay me overtime when I pass 8 hours on shift not just 40hrs plus. And I have to go to the beach? Fuck, glad the porn isn't cut off to curb this edge I have. Or you know...
Probably a sign of how hopelessly stupid America is, hating the result of the people they vote for rather than the people they vote for who make these things happen.
Republicans have passed a bunch of laws that require age/ ID verification for viewing pornhub in states they control. This effectively kills pornhub on those states because no normal person is going to send a photographed picture of their ID for a porn company to hold for like fifty different rational and irrational reasons.
Make sure to check out the [pinned post on Loss](https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1472nhh/faq_loss/) to make sure this submission doesn't break the rule! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke) if you have any questions or concerns.*
She pops up explaining that states have added new harsher age verification for porn sites when you visit porn hub. Porn hub and some other adult sites stopped letting people onto them because its almost impossible to age verify someone on the internet
I'm in Utah, and a person has to upload a copy of their driver's license under the new age verification rules. I don't know what the rule is in other states. In response, the hub shut down operation here. This has led to a rather huge upswing in VPN usage here.
Crazy coincidence the amount of politicians supporting this that had a stake in vpn companies
https://preview.redd.it/b3ph8zdy6v9d1.jpeg?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=13cd4e17ac6bc2e960014914e9e2c122da670364
Using this for my next works cited if I get an instructor I cannot stand
Little glass rose vase?
Peetah, what does this mushroom mean?
crack pipe
\*cough cough\* thank you Peetah very nice
It’s a meth pipe though fyi.
Asking in all sincerity: What’s the difference?
This is a meth pipe. Crack you smoke with a direct flame or a torch. Crack pipes are straight and they use a little piece of chore boy in the end as a filter. Meth you use indirect heat and you swirl the pipe around. The meth turns into an oil and you lightly hit the bottom of the pipe with a flame.
None. Both crack and meth can be smoked with it, along many other "pure" drugs that evaporate when heated. Like DMT for example.
Meth pipe has the bulb, because you want to heat up and not burn the meth. Crack pipe is a tube with a filter (usually steel wool) because you need to burn crack. I asked the same question once.
Source?
https://preview.redd.it/xp0n1p32yv9d1.png?width=1095&format=png&auto=webp&s=175cc668e38b51ecd1048223b8a847682757bc4c
It was revealed to me in a dream...
And then I forgot it in another dream
Based.
This guy Utahs
I made it the fuck up
While not on this particular issue, Florida's lawmaker who had millions in stocks for drug testing companies passed a law (that was later deemed unconstitutional) that required welfare recipients to be drug tested. This law did not save the state any money, it actually costed them as the testing was more expensive than the money they didn't give to a few recipients. He transfered his stocks to his wife to try and hide the obvious conflict of interest. So while it may or may not have happened here, it absolutely does happen Here's a bit of a long read for a source on my example: https://www.forbes.com/sites/judystone/2015/02/17/the-sham-of-drug-testing-walker-scott-and-political-pandering/
I mean yeah, people should absolutely call it out when it does happen. But that doesn’t mean it’s okay for people to just make shit up and spread disinformation.
I would argue that you should interpret comments like these as satire/sarcasm until a source is provided
I took what he said as a joke, because it does happen. The internet is weird and so subjective, because we make tone up in our head.
It is really REALLY damaging to society. The whole "vaccines cause autism" thing happened because a guy published a BS paper saying there was a link between the MMR vaccine and autism and then he was going to say that HIS version of the MMR vaccine doesn't cause autism so he could make lots of money. So kids are dying from preventable diseases because some asshole wanted to make lots of money.
Trust me bro
Actually the money is coming from the people running the verification services. It's actually being done fairly out in the open, basically it's traffic cameras all over again. They paid to get their cameras up there. They did nothing to improve road safety and did everything to generate a bunch of money for the people placing the cameras.
So here's my Driver's license so you can track the type of porn I watch down to my mailing address?
*knocks on door* "How can I help you Officer?" "Well sir, you mind explaining what the hell this is?" *shows search history of uniform cop porn* "Uhhh, fuck the police?"
How is that faring with people? In terms of- is this sort of thing getting on people’s nerves enough to have an electoral impact? I feel like at the local level these things matter, like I remember in my home country in São Paulo, people were irate when the mayor reduced the speed limit rules at night to reduce traffic deaths a few years back. The way people spoke, it was one the main grievances and he may have lost the election on that issue alone.
If people falling into poverty hasnt had one I dont see how this will Especially considering how little impact the average voter seems to have nowadays
They've found ways to make us willing to hurt ourselves in order to 'win'. "As long as [insert other political party here] doesn't win!"
At local level you have so much more impact though, and your vote matters so much more. Like in Utah the governor primary in the gop was decided by 40k votes.
And how much impact in grand politics does a local gov have? (Genuine question because over here all they do is on the level of deciding parking fees and rubber stamping construction projects)
A state governor has a LOT of impact on how your life is in an individual state. For example, many states are now passing anti-abortion laws. Without a governor to sign those into power, the laws will not pass. A democrat governor in that state, could veto that law for the state, and unless the legislature for the state can over-ride the veto, the law will not go into effect. The governor for each state is like a mini-president for that individual state.
Local politics is generally very impactful in your day to day life. Fixing potholes and/or speeding or local housing regulations are all very tangible effects that impact your day to day life, more than foreign policy. On average (there are exceptional moments and exceptional decisions), local politics has a bigger impact in your day to day life than national politics. It’s just definitely not as sexy. Like think about it: traffic while unsexy, has a major impact on your life. If you manage to cut out half of your commute in terms of time, that’s like a large amount of extra time in your day you get back. And that’s a local issue,
I would argue the difference is how and who the impact is being directed. Policies causing poverty are largely debated and indirect on how those policies cause it, leading to easy passing of the blame. It also only directly affects a subset of individuals. Meanwhile, this policy is caused by specific politicians and directly connected from the policy to the result. In addition, this policy is something that is affecting everyone that wants to access the content, which is bigger than what politicians would have you believe. It doesn't matter if you are homeless with a phone connected to a restaurants wi-fi or Scrooge McDuck in your McMansion, it will affect you. With the various sites having their own messages listing why you cannot access them, they are in effect campaigning directly to their userbase to vote out the politicians who did this. tldr: Poverty is hard to connect to politicians and does not directly impact as many people as this policy does
Ppl aren't rly bothered from what I've understood. Ppl that are looking for free porn aren't exactly concerned with how they get it. Shadier sites & VPNs that shirk the laws make getting free porn accessable still enough that the masses happy. And it's not hitting all sites, just the sites that have sunk a substantial amount of cash in their site like pornhub. Xhampster had this video for a while, but they caved to age verification. Safer sites like those have more to lose from implementation of ID verification - the states that require ID *want* the big sites to fuck up so they can be made examples of. Meanwhile, shadier sites like Xvideo DGAF bc their servers are prolly off in a country that DGAF & state government can't touch them. I'm kinda curious about how this is going to look in a post Proj '25 Merika bc I can totally see the GOP attempting to make this a federal law. Then they *could* do things like shutdown VPNs & have the FBI do server raids on the shadier sites like they did over copyright strikes.
The hub suddenly having a massive influx of users from Albania.
I mean, why not just use another site for porn? People really seem to have brand loyalty for what they use to jack off
Well you clearly have never looked for that one particular video from 7 years ago that was just perfect and is “ol reliable”
Then you're not gonna find it on pornhub, they removed all videos from unverified accounts and banned them from uploading a few years back.
Ever had a shame wank or fell down the wank spiral?
Ever drunk Bailey’s from a shoe?
Wanna go to a club where people wee on eachotha?
https://preview.redd.it/u3okog9y5w9d1.jpeg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3ff0e33cc131054934bffccd7164a302ca8857d8
Joey, have you ever seen a grown man naked?
Holy shit dude, I have 637 browser windows still open to porn because I don’t want to lose them. My phone dies every three minutes.
Kid named download
make an account man
This is part of the problem, sites like Pornhub and others that have verification requirements and a safe browsing experience will obey the law, but sketchier sites full of malware, hosted internationally, and hosting child SA content won't. The government isn't "protecting kids from porn" but rather financially punishing porn creators and sites that play by the rules and funneling users toward illegal content.
Kinda funny how it's mostly Conservatives who want all of this, when this is the exact same point they make about gun control
Shh, don’t logic them! It makes their brains hurt.
One of the goals of Project 2025 is to make porn illegal, this verification data will help them target people in the future.
It's the stupidest thing ever. There are just things that it isn't realistic to illegalise, it's just gonna end up like prohibition
A famous love child of the orthodox theater groups
How do you keep people focused on an unwinnable cause? Declare 'war' on something vague like drugs or immorality. You can then cherry pick the examples that target the demographic you want to target.
Pornhibition
Indiana just tried the same thing but a judge blocked it and called it unconstitutional, hopefully it'll get resolved in favor of the common folk and set a precedent for the other states trying to enact this madness.
This guy hubs.
r/thisguythisguys
This guy r/thisguythisguys
Here's a sneak peek of /r/thisguythisguys using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/thisguythisguys/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year! \#1: [This guy knows guys ](https://i.redd.it/gucanpj3d7oc1.png) | [50 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/thisguythisguys/comments/1be92z7/this_guy_knows_guys/) \#2: [This guy hotels](https://i.redd.it/2p4jo0tk4eua1.jpg) | [12 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/thisguythisguys/comments/12ox4bi/this_guy_hotels/) \#3: [This guy shits](https://i.redd.it/s7tu2kf5ofwa1.jpg) | [15 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/thisguythisguys/comments/130esla/this_guy_shits/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
This bot bots
r/thisguythisbots
Gottem!!
This guy shits??? I've never been more afraid to click a link in all my life 😂
Get a load of this guy
Get a load in this guy.
No homo in this guy
Homo *on* him is okay though, right?
Get a load of this guy on me
Not any more :(
It's not that it's impossible to age verify someone. It's more of a huge invasion of privacy. What if the system gets hacked and everyone's id's get leaked out on the internet? Pornhub is just dealing with the law in a way that won't open them up to future law suits.
It's also just neither financially nor technologically advantageous for them to make the changes. Adding an age verification system connected to Govt issued ID is wildly expensive and requires a lot of infrastructure inconsistent with a video hosting website
And nobody wants to risk their searches for black midget lesbian donkey porn anywhere near a government database.
https://preview.redd.it/ipctv1n8xu9d1.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=2c6082ccd5d785c0c50b5333a7118fdfa463a52b
yeah. we should all do our part and make sure his death wasn't in vain. Rack up those sins.
The book literally tells you how to get away with being a shitty person. You can sin all you want -just be baptized and repent.
https://preview.redd.it/96e33t2zou9d1.jpeg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c6a28d0f0bf516b96fc58ed2772156dc53f7feaf
I just noticed upper left one seems to like it
lol yes she does
https://preview.redd.it/aydp1lqk8v9d1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=495daccde633f348fd5f3d1fc10f27e0c8498a96
And I thought I was the only one!
Wait, so is it black midget lesbians and donkeys, or black midgets and lesbian donkeys? Asking for a friend.
Yes
Well, in general, if you make these laws, it should be the government to create the necessary infrastructure to enable age verification. Take for example ther German eID. Even though this system is hardly ever used, it provides an easy and accessible system for age verification. If you have your ID (which you are required to own by law) a card reader and your PIN for the ID, a website can send a simple age verification request to the governmental issued program for access to the eID. That program is designed to give a simple "yes/no" answer to the age verification request. There is no additional information given out beyond a "younger or older than 18", this minimising the security risk for data leaking.
I feel like exposing the identities of people who go on porn sites is part of the plan honestly.
It certainly is. Project 2025 aims to make porn illegal and then you can selectively target your enemies while pretending it's for moral reasons. It's basically the criminalization of weed repackaged.
https://preview.redd.it/2yyfaeuwut9d1.jpeg?width=852&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5f5df951a8fcb395651a9347a9ce745ef5aa086c
And that's if PornHub leaks. I imagine [horseporn.com](http://horseporn.com) would have laxer security standards, and a lot of us would be way more interested to see who goes *there*. ^(BTW, checked the site to see if it was real. It is. It is weird but SFW.)
you can't convince me to make that link anything but blue
>!It redirects to [https://londonpost.com/BHP.mp4](https://londonpost.com/BHP.mp4) , a video saying something incoherent about a penny stock.!<
I can remember that someone ran a dating website for married people looking for an affair. The data were deliberately not very well protected because the owner used them as blackmail material.
Even worse; if the your I.D can be linked with what you have been watching. Look... we have all looked at some weird shit on pornhub late at night when bored.
It's more that it costs money to implement age verification. And that money is lost when most people just search for sites that don't verify instead. They did it once, it just didn't work financially.
How many horny people have jacked off to her?
I don't know what the answer was, but it's one more now.
:(
I have to say, this was neither a question nor an answer i was expecting to see in these comments. Bravo 🤌🤌🤌
I mean probably millions right? One of the best milf performers of the last 10 years or so. Wait, I mean I don't know. Never seen her in my life.
Well, seeing as she is a pornstar...
What do you mean, impossible to verify? You mean the "yes, i'm older than 18" button isn't legit?
Yes, that's not good enough for the government, unfortunately, they want verification via something like a government issued ID or SSN
Lol, I wouldn't even provide that to sites I \*do\* trust nowadays
Is xnxx on that list?
lemme check.... no, suprisingly, xvideos neither
🤣🤣😂
And she looks like she’s in an intro for a porn IRONIC
Simply use a VPN, grab the video link, and then download the video.
I mean Steam does it just fine
It's actually suuuuuper easy... They can just have a splash page that asks "are you 18?... Yes, (if you lie, we'll know and report you to the police and your mom) or No, GTFO here kid" It's literally foolproof.
the state laws require state id verification
Overthrow the fucking government 🙄🥱
She’s an advertisement for VPNs
That’s great. Wish I had more than an upvote for ya
I can help with that
Not so useless anymore.
What’s the advertisement?
Your politicians have made porn illegal, so I'm going to keep my shirt on until you fix it.
Ms. DeVille is just doing her job, I got no beef with her.
Right!? Why would people be getting mad at the person who is telling you what your state and local government is forcing you to do. Get mad at your politicians not the citizens who actively opposing their dumb laws
She’s been nothing but good to me in the past. I get why she’s doing what she’s doing. The whole things is bullshit. Especially since these laws were put in place by Trump supporters…and Trump literally paid to have sex with a porn star. It doesn’t bother them when their dear leader is out there being “immoral”, but for any regular person to have access to porn is a bridge too far apparently.
lots of meat but no beef
The United States? No. Arkansas, Louisiana, Virginia, Texas, North Carolina, Montana, Utah and Mississippi? Yes
Alabama, too.
Kansas as well
Oklahoma sucks also
Add Nebraska starting today too. But its always been poo poo
Ok
Oklahoma sucks but you can still access pornography
parts of South Carolina arent legally affected but still get sucked into the regional ban
Same with Maryland. I’m nowhere close to Virginia.
Really, Is there anywhere in MD that is not more than 100 maybe a 150 miles from Virginia?
I guess not. I was thinking in terms of driving but by water it’s right around the corner so you’re right
Someone in SOMD?
It works for me and I’m in Anne Arundel County
IKR sucks
Not my United States lol
Come to California - we've got porn!
You even make it! Home made, so to say ...
And Idaho joining soon
Funny how it's all the rightwing, protecting yer free speech states. Almost like they be lying about that. That the only speech they want to protect is the speech they use everyday.
Freedom! *Unless you want to masturbate, get an abortion, have any sexual but heterosexual, have any religion apart from Christianity or have any anonymity online*
Coming soon to Kentucky
Indiana as of today, too
So much for small government in “those” states!
This is Cherie DeVille, and in states where PornHub is blocked instead of whatever spicy video you wanted to watch you get a video of her explaining why PornHub decided to block you instead. Edit: Come on guys, it's a Google search away. https://youtu.be/09Ovt2t6SgQ?si=MKA3uFOzKD92k_Oa
Brazzers, too.
It would be just perfect for the people who weren't paying attention to politics to blame the woman telling them who's responsible instead of the people she's warning them about, wouldn't it?
People advocate for collateral damage for lot of other crimes till they are in cross hairs.
Reminds me of one of the early hate crimes after 9/11. Which wasn't even a Muslim, but a Sikh man minding his own business.
Now I'm curious about what she has to say to that would be important enough to show rather than just show an error screen of some kind. Any sauce for that video?
Yeah, pornhub dot com. Just do it from a state that blocks it. It goes into detail about how blocking pornography isn't a solution, and to contact your legislature to get the bans repealed.
Telling someone to go to another state is not providing a source lmao
*puts suitcase down* ...ye-yeah! What they said!
https://youtu.be/09Ovt2t6SgQ?si=MKA3uFOzKD92k_Oa
What were people supposed to google? They didn’t mention porn or pornhub or a name to this person.
You know - just google it! It's only google. Don't you know how to google? /s
How are people supposed to searched based on nothing
Dude, for some reason when I typed "pornhub blocked woman video" in google, I got a lot of DIFFERENT VIDEOS.
wtf? I need to see this XD
What is this world cumming to :(
And is it still free?
Low key brilliant comment
Not pornhub in certain states
Thank you, u/Ass_Salada Truly a poet.
E621 . Net
I mean. It’s a law issue. You should vote to not see her anymore.
Well, some people will want to see her either way. >!Not that I know who she is, or what she does. Just in case the missus browses Reddit!<
Well, no reason to blame her…
Can't wait until I open up a Playboy and get greeted with: "Hi, I'm Cherie DeVille. As you may know, you're elected officials have required us to verify your age before granting you access to this content."
I MUST RESIST! I must resist......... I must... *your
It’s not her fault though
So they take porn away from sites that are meant for porn but won’t crack down on all the porn that’s on social media?
https://preview.redd.it/qnqfsynvhx9d1.jpeg?width=345&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8fc65859b8e60f8aed286127f2e5e691856f30e7
Wow, I had no idea this was the case because I live in "Commiefornia"
Dude. I live in Commiefornia too. It hurts being oppressed that my boss has to pay me overtime when I pass 8 hours on shift not just 40hrs plus. And I have to go to the beach? Fuck, glad the porn isn't cut off to curb this edge I have. Or you know...
Probably a sign of how hopelessly stupid America is, hating the result of the people they vote for rather than the people they vote for who make these things happen.
It might be that, if it was some kind of verifiable opinion poll, and not literally a joke.
Who is that?
A reason to get a VPN.
Why would they hate her? The only people they can blame is in their mirror.
That's not Kristi Noem
and this is why you should use a vpn. even a free one works :)
Who is she I’ve never seen her but now those sites all ask if I’m 18 and some ask what my gender is? Like why?
Christ people use a VPN.
Defeating the point of not paying a fee for having a wank. 🫡
I guess you better start voting out the people who want to criminalize porn in sneaky ways, then.
Porn is always the answer q
Sounds like you guys forgot about Carol-Fuckin-BASKIN!!!
Quick tip: turn on your data and turn off your WiFi
If you see this just use xvideos
[удалено]
Any kid with a vpn hasn't seen her
To the person who just upvoted this, I'm bored
Republicans have passed a bunch of laws that require age/ ID verification for viewing pornhub in states they control. This effectively kills pornhub on those states because no normal person is going to send a photographed picture of their ID for a porn company to hold for like fifty different rational and irrational reasons.