It really depends on the fat percentage of the body - while it takes a fair amount of effort to get the fat deposits to ignite, they do burn rather spectacularly when you do…
No, I'd say you just don't like BBC.
From the article:
>The attacker climbed on a large waste bin and threw a petrol bomb through a small window, setting the synagogue alight.
>Firefighters at the scene eventually brought the fire under control inside the synagogue in the historic centre of the city.
>The walls and furniture had been left blackened by the fire, although "the books of the Torah, the holy books, did not come to any harm".
In some circles and texts it's encouraged to pretend to be peaceful instead, which is a virtue to them, while trying to destroy other religions for bonus points.
LOL did you even read my comment? You are wondering why people mock warnings about increased antisemitism, and I gave you one of the answers.
Your response here only served to prove my point.
Lol shut up Beria! I bet you haven't even once read about tiglat pileser III?
Go back way back in history and pop the Marxist bubble of ignorance you've been since birth.
You can't see why this is a terrorist attack against Jews?
Attacking a Jewish place of worship in France is not anti-Zionism, it's antisemitism. Blaming Jews across the world for what's happening in Israel/Gaza is also antisemitism.
For the “antizionist not antisemite” crowd,
This does NOTHING to help Palestine.
This does not affect Israel in anyway.
Pump the brakes on your gaslighting
Maybe you should pump the brakes on the gaslighting. Which anti Zionist crowd is supporting this action?
Your leap to include them all as associates to this act speaks more about you then it does about them.
“Man shot dead after French synagogue set on fire” — Actual title of article.
Not sure if BBC changed it since OP posted or if OP did not post under actual title.
“Man shot dead after French synagogue set on fire” — Actual title of article.
Not sure if BBC changed it since OP posted or if OP did not post under actual title.
BBC update their titles and articles regularly after they're first published, especially for ones reporting on such incidents as this, as more verifiable information comes to light. It was this title originally when the article was posted (If I'm remembering the BBC app notification I think I got for it correctly), so must have been amended since. If all they were told at the initial press notification was e.g. *man shot at synagogue, and was trying to set it on fire* then the slightly wrong title makes sense.
It sounds more like french police stopped an ongoing terrorist attack against a synagogue with the only casualty being the terrorist.
[удалено]
For fucks sake
The BBC’s title is trying to minimize the damage. He set a synagogue on fire and did significant damage.
Eliminate the word "trying" from the title sounds more accurate
French police kill man to burn synagogue
There we go. Perfecto 🤌 That should clear up any confusion
Clearly the French Police needed kindling to set the fire. Not sure a human makes the best kindling though.
It really depends on the fat percentage of the body - while it takes a fair amount of effort to get the fat deposits to ignite, they do burn rather spectacularly when you do…
God, it reminds me of my Curse of Strahd campaign that I'm on. Turns out the only thing you need to start off a bonfire festival is a child.
Eliminate "man" because he wasn't simply a man.... (/s)
Title is now "Man shot dead after French synagogue set on fire"
Rouen: French police kill man who set fire to synagogue.
No, I'd say you just don't like BBC. From the article: >The attacker climbed on a large waste bin and threw a petrol bomb through a small window, setting the synagogue alight. >Firefighters at the scene eventually brought the fire under control inside the synagogue in the historic centre of the city. >The walls and furniture had been left blackened by the fire, although "the books of the Torah, the holy books, did not come to any harm".
Whatever happened to the social contract of 'dont be a dick'?
In some circles and texts it's encouraged to pretend to be peaceful instead, which is a virtue to them, while trying to destroy other religions for bonus points.
[удалено]
Oh you know it’s just a figure of speech coming from the crowd that constantly likes to remind people that words matter.
I think they know what it means, they just don't care, its not like its a hidden meaning behind it, its very very clear
And yet people continue to mock warnings about the increased antisemitism around the world.
[удалено]
Now you’re blaming the Jews for antisemitism.
The communists love victim blaming.
Now you're conflating Israel and Jews, off to antisemitism jail with you.
LOL did you even read my comment? You are wondering why people mock warnings about increased antisemitism, and I gave you one of the answers. Your response here only served to prove my point.
Lol shut up Beria! I bet you haven't even once read about tiglat pileser III? Go back way back in history and pop the Marxist bubble of ignorance you've been since birth.
[удалено]
It's a building that didn't have to damaged at all, because nothing about it is involved in the war in between Israel Palestine
Congrats on being the problem
Burning a house of worship hundreds of miles away to intimidate Jews who have nothing to do with Israel will sure show Israel what’s up!
Right on cue!
You can't see why this is a terrorist attack against Jews? Attacking a Jewish place of worship in France is not anti-Zionism, it's antisemitism. Blaming Jews across the world for what's happening in Israel/Gaza is also antisemitism.
This disgusting take is exactly my point.
[удалено]
There are many people who are using the current war there as an excuse to act on their antisemitism under the guise of being pro-Palestinian.
Example of anyone notable mocking such?
For starters, you need only look at the first comment in response to mine.
What a legit retort!
Yes he very well knows that commies can't read when reading destroys their ignorant blabbering! How dare he! /S
Pay a-fucking-ttention? Its not hard to see
Just look around
For the “antizionist not antisemite” crowd, This does NOTHING to help Palestine. This does not affect Israel in anyway. Pump the brakes on your gaslighting
Maybe you should pump the brakes on the gaslighting. Which anti Zionist crowd is supporting this action? Your leap to include them all as associates to this act speaks more about you then it does about them.
Did he try explaining to the police that he's an antizionist not antisemite?
“Man shot dead after French synagogue set on fire” — Actual title of article. Not sure if BBC changed it since OP posted or if OP did not post under actual title.
BBC updates their headlines all the time, so I’m pretty sure OP used what was the correct title at the time.
Seems like the right move
He died like an animal. /Muad'dib
Fine, society & tax payers don’t have to deal with him
“Man shot dead after French synagogue set on fire” — Actual title of article. Not sure if BBC changed it since OP posted or if OP did not post under actual title.
BBC update their titles and articles regularly after they're first published, especially for ones reporting on such incidents as this, as more verifiable information comes to light. It was this title originally when the article was posted (If I'm remembering the BBC app notification I think I got for it correctly), so must have been amended since. If all they were told at the initial press notification was e.g. *man shot at synagogue, and was trying to set it on fire* then the slightly wrong title makes sense.
[удалено]
"The man was armed with a knife and a metallic tool and was shot after he threatened officers"
It was a terror attack, not merely property damage
I'm sure defending terrorists is justified...🤦🤦🤦
Judging by the some of the university protests the past few weeks some of them are defending terrorists
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]