The Russians have done everything even illegal gas attacks on Ukrainians. Nope they will not use any "bigger'' explosion type bombs. That is just a tool the Russians and every fact ignoring Russian supporters like to use.
This is why IMO Ukraine should just absolutely pound and destroy everything in Crimea. Ruin the harbor Russia wants so bad for their navy, destroy the bridge so bad that it can never be rebuilt. Just go crazy.
That way even if Russia still holds onto Crimea it won't be worth much.
I don't know about *everything*. After all, Ukraine's ultimate objective is to reclaim these lands from Russia. Spending millions to make those lands decimated to the point of being less than worthless would seem counterproductive if you expected people to return back there.
But I'm all for destroying the port and any buildings that Russians built since 2014, as well as any buildings Russians used for their military. That includes the Kerch bridge. Let it become a new habitat for coral and crustaceans at the bottom of the Black Sea.
Does Ukraine have the man power to even take it back? Even with Western weapons/f16s? It seems like some devstating shit would need to happen to/within Russia because they have a good number of ethnic minorities they can continue to throw into the meat grinder
Ukraine is definitely suffering from a serious lack of ammo and manpower at the moment. I doubt even when/if the ammo issue gets fixed that they could do a convention assault on Crimea and drive Russia out. Instead take out the bridge, move forward enough to put all supply lines into range and just slowly bleed them out. It'll take ages but will likely be less costly than actually fighting for it.
Maybe their special ops guys could hijack a cargo ship and just bonk it into the bridge.
Any civil engineers ITT? It looks like a different kind of bridge than the one in Baltimore, but F=m\*a is F=m\*a, right?
They already tried a truck bomb and a couple drone strikes. I imagine a ship the size of a city block like in Baltimore is less sneaky and more sinkable.
Seems a bit unfair on the people on the cargo ship. I used to work on them and I'd be pretty annoyed if someone stuck a gun in my face and drove my workplace into a bridge.
They don't need manpower. Take out the bridge, sink supply ships, shell the road in or manage to advance to the coast (simply holding a key intersection to break the connection would work). Then just wait for the water to run out. It's not a defensible position without the bridge.
Where manpower becomes an issue is pushing the Russians out of Eastern Ukraine. Unless the Russians run out of ammo, that's not happening without NATO boots.
> Does Ukraine have the man power to even take it back?
Well, Ukraine *does* have the power to deny it to Russia in the sense that it's now unusable as navy base for Russia: they have to put their ships elsewhere. That kind of demonstration holds weight at the negotiation table.
It’ll still be worth a lot to Russia. It gives them good access to the Black Sea. That has economic and security benefits even if Crimea was just a port and an uninhabitable desert. But it also happens to be some pretty premo land as well
# Then destroy Novorossiysk!
The big non-Ukrainian Black Sea port in Russia, that is so big, Russia needs Crimea to have access the Black Sea, because Russia could otherwise have no warm water port in the Black Sea besides Novorossiysk, which somehow does not count.
It had 18% of the Russian cargo turnover. It's a much more important target than the fucking bridge. Sink the cargo ships between Istanbul and Novorossiysk!
Position s 9/10ths. expropriation law in Thailand:
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/special-reports/312580/property-in-thailand-part-3-can-the-government-take-it-away
so it _can_ be done with a valid reason and some steps. But they would be shooting themselves in the foot out of tourism money.
Sound like a great reason to pay Thialand a bunch of money and seize Russian owned assets. I 100% agree with you - impossible, but it would definitely hit some oligarchs where it hurts. Lots of more easily accessible Russian assets we should be seizing anyway.
Thailand likes to be neutral in these matters. They need a good relationship with china, and benefit from being on the fence.
They would not like being pressured to make enemies of their allies.
chemical and biological weapons in kyiv. Justing saying they can always go deeper even without using nukes.
No one is going to do anything additional beyond words. Of course Ukraine will be armed (until trump is elected), but there will be no special response.
Jokes aside, they'll probably blow up another public building with innocent civilians in it. Reddit likes to take their threats lightly, but it's still Russia and they've been killing a shitload of Ukrainian civilians.
I love the contrast with the US.
Where Russia keeps crying nuke, the US stated clearly that a nuclear strike against Ukraine would cause a large conventional response from the US. There are no threats of retaliatory nuclear strikes, because if the situation calls for a nuclear response, the option still exists, but if it doesn't the US doesn't look weak, because it doesn't have to backpedal*.
Nuclear deterrent only works if the conditions are clear and if a threat to use them is dead serious. Running their mount cost Russia the most useful capability of their most expensive weapons system.
Never make a threat you aren't going to carry out.
I have no doubt the US will follow through in any threats it makes.
The US doesn't usually make direct threats. They use implied threats. The US will do things like parking a carrier strike group off the coast of a nation and then attempting diplomatic talks. The other nation is well aware that it is there and the implications, so there is no need to saber rattle. It also allows more friendly talks because the talks will be more respectful when one side isn't threatening to attack the other.
There is a reason that the US is allied with something like half of all nations, while Russia has no formal allies.
russia has a land connection to crimea from the weest of the Azov Sea. They have a lot of land secured. The bridge is nice, but not the only way to drive supplies into crimea.
that being said... please blow this bridge up
The key thing about the bridge is the rail line going across it.
Sending tanks and other military vehicles to the front by truck is ridiculously slow and inefficient. Russia's supply lines rely heavily on rail transport.
It is not as much a question whether the bridge can be destroyed, but whether it makes sense.
Were the summer push of Ukraine to Azov in 2023 to be successful, the bridge would be a life-and-death question for russia, but it is not at the moment. And the US delaying for 5-6 months had been bad enough that not only Ukraine couldn't hope for a new push in 2024, it had to retreat from some territories, and now the support of 2025 is in question, giving the sexual abusing orange guy still being in the poll lead.
There might be better targets for ATACMS and Scalps than a symbolic bridge that will get fixed in 2 months without much disruption. I still think it will be disabled somewhere this year, but it will be a victory for the morale rather than strategic one.
Transport of land supplies via truck is far more inefficient, and such supplies are well within range of Ukraine strike capabilities.
It will not solve Russia's issues with Crimean resupply if the bridge goes down.
Intercepting a truck from 100 km is beyond the reasonable efforts. Given there can't be a new push until 2025, that is enough time for russia to expand the railway network, which it had already started some time ago.
The toughest battles happen close to Donetsk, occupied from 2014 and which had always had a rail connection to russia for the last 50+ years.
It would be funny if Ukraine would keep destroying russian AA systems in Crimea while never striking the bridge, forcing other objects in russia to stay defenseless.
It isn't beyond reasonable efforts at all. It can be done with drones carrying light explosive munitions, and Ukraine has displayed a remarkable reach with such drone attacks.
The rail line from Rostov-on-don will also be well within strike range whenever they're able to finish the connection. Currently it only runs through Mariupol. We'll see how easily they can build it up and maintain it over the next year, but it won't be a simple matter in a warzone.
>Currently it only runs through Mariupol. We'll see how easily they can build it up and maintain it over the next year, but it won't be a simple matter in a warzone.
Ouch, that sounds like a primary target for logistical strikes once Kerch is eliminated.
If you look at the content of the recent US aid package, it's very heavy on ammo and vehicles. If the US military was intelligent (and they can be *very* intelligent when they make the effort) those supplies have already been staged in Germany or Poland.
Lead with a massive drone strike, we're talking ~100 heavy lift drones loaded with 20 to 30 kilos of C4 each, follow up with a couple/few HIMARS cluster munitions a week, and that hub is done for. You'd never repair the damage of the leading strike when you have heavy grade cluster munitions dropping out of the sky every day or two (or three, or four, or a few hours apart, who knows? Gotta make it interesting!). You'd have to make the repair crews work at gunpoint, which only ups the casualties when the clouds start speaking submunition.
Clearing even one derailed or disabled train from the lines is multiple days of around the clock effort. Then drop a few hundred submunitions into the middle of that effort. Now you're clearing bodies, clearing the equipment brought in to clear the derailed train... it's a compounding logistical and manpower nightmare.
>giving the sexual abusing orange guy still being in the poll lead
who's currently in court because he ejaculated inside of a porn star then paid her illegally not to tell anyone
Conservatives don't actually care about morals at all. The bible is a tool to be wielded against those they view as lesser. Whatever the conservative does is good, and moral, and whatever the "other" does is bad and immoral, the bible says so right here! This still holds even if the actions are identical, because it's the person that is moral, not the action itself.
Once you realize that all conservatives are unserious people who only care about themselves, they are a lot easier to understand.
This is why wars should start with the shoe-pissing, then escalate to full-on shitting in their garden at midnight. Let the petty stuff work its magic first.
No, final warnings are [China’s trick](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%27s_final_warning). You’re thinking of Russia’s [red lines](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_lines_in_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War).
The Moskva?
Surely you’re joking. There’s no way anything could have happened to the Moskva! It’s the invincible pride of the Russian navy! It carries a priceless Fabergé Egg and a fragment of the True Cross of Christ! It’s the *flagship* of the Black Sea fleet! Putin himself travels on the Moskva when visiting other countries.
There’s simply no way that any country could *ever* hurt the Moskva, much less a country with no navy at all!
God, that never stops being funny.
The main character of one Italian novel once said " if every fragment of the Cross scattered around the world were real our Lord and Saviour was probably crucified on a stilt house"
How DARE Ukraine fight back!!!!! All Russia did was invade their country and bomb their civilians.... And probably executed some civilians.... And.. alegedly gassed Ukrainian troops...etc...etc...
>alegedly gassed Ukrainian troops
Allegedly?
They even posted the video.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/comments/1ciktrm/russian_drone_dropping_a_k51_chloropicrin_granade/
You forgot about the whole rape and torture thing.
And abduct children and force them into Russian families and military academy's.
Fuck Russia
That bridge is going down.
What more can Russia do that Ukrainians haven’t suffered without demonstrating themselves as the most evil group of sinners on this earth? Their threats are meaningless, or they choose go alienate themselves further.
PS. I eagerly await the destruction of this bridge.
Not only that, but they know what kind of tyrannical apocalyptic shit awaits them if they do give in. Also known as The Holodomor, which Russia caused * checks notes * because they could.
Ukraine should start hitting the vodka distilleries. Once Russia starts having to ration vodka you know it's going to really hit home with the general population and then they'll stop this madness.
Disclaimer, just some guy on reddit. This may or may not be effective strategy against Russia, I have no idea.
I remember reading somewhere a few years ago that the nearest Russia came to riots was when they were considering putting (more?) tax on vodka. If this is true, it would certainly be the way to go!
Destroy it! Russia doesn’t get to invade AND make up the rules. Bad enough they try to call cease fire a couple of times already for their own benefit. Fuck Russia.
The only escalation they have that they haven't used is small yield targeted nukes. Other than that, they are just talking out of their ass. Must be kinda sad realizing you've used up all your options to induce fear.
“We’re going to really fuck you up in this war where we invaded you two years ago if you damage the bridge in the area we stole from you ten years ago!”
Hmmmm. Russia will deliver “devastating revenge” if Ukraine hits Putin’s favorite.
I guess things could get worse, so not to laugh this off.
But….. hitting the bridge is a military response to RUSSIA INVADING UKRAINE.
FAFO
By the way: GOP? Or. Dem? Vote wisely.
Big mouth Russians at it again. When will they learn? This bridge is will be attacked until it crumbles and it's only a matter of time before that happens. Revenge? OK.
What are they gonna do, invade?
[удалено]
**Moans in Defence**
Sir the trenches are moist!
Slip and slide, private!
I’m doing my part! Would you like to know more? [y/n]
Every day, Federal scientists are looking for new ways to kill bugs.
The only good bug is a dead bug!
Did you just call a dead bug? Here we go!
make sure you don't slip and slide in the crack
I’d like to know more
It’s afraid. # IT’S AFRAID!
What are you doing, step Putin?
Where's he Putin it?
Get in there you big furry oaf, I don’t care what you smell!
Then we shall fight in the gush.
That's it, enough Reddit for today.
Like a Japanese porn
“We are gonna put EVEN MORE aluminum siding on our tanks. Then you’ll see!”
Invade me harder, daddy
[удалено]
Blyatmobiles will go flying. Oh, wait...
He's already invaded, he cant invade any harder!
_invading intensifies_
They might target Ukraine's civilian population centers and vital service infrastructure. Oh, wait.
They might attack a nuclear plant..ohh wait Maybe they will attack with chemical weapons....no already did that.
They might blow up a dam and flood…, wait, no that already happened too.
The Russians have done everything even illegal gas attacks on Ukrainians. Nope they will not use any "bigger'' explosion type bombs. That is just a tool the Russians and every fact ignoring Russian supporters like to use.
This is why IMO Ukraine should just absolutely pound and destroy everything in Crimea. Ruin the harbor Russia wants so bad for their navy, destroy the bridge so bad that it can never be rebuilt. Just go crazy. That way even if Russia still holds onto Crimea it won't be worth much.
I don't know about *everything*. After all, Ukraine's ultimate objective is to reclaim these lands from Russia. Spending millions to make those lands decimated to the point of being less than worthless would seem counterproductive if you expected people to return back there. But I'm all for destroying the port and any buildings that Russians built since 2014, as well as any buildings Russians used for their military. That includes the Kerch bridge. Let it become a new habitat for coral and crustaceans at the bottom of the Black Sea.
Does Ukraine have the man power to even take it back? Even with Western weapons/f16s? It seems like some devstating shit would need to happen to/within Russia because they have a good number of ethnic minorities they can continue to throw into the meat grinder
Ukraine is definitely suffering from a serious lack of ammo and manpower at the moment. I doubt even when/if the ammo issue gets fixed that they could do a convention assault on Crimea and drive Russia out. Instead take out the bridge, move forward enough to put all supply lines into range and just slowly bleed them out. It'll take ages but will likely be less costly than actually fighting for it.
Maybe their special ops guys could hijack a cargo ship and just bonk it into the bridge. Any civil engineers ITT? It looks like a different kind of bridge than the one in Baltimore, but F=m\*a is F=m\*a, right?
They already tried a truck bomb and a couple drone strikes. I imagine a ship the size of a city block like in Baltimore is less sneaky and more sinkable.
Seems a bit unfair on the people on the cargo ship. I used to work on them and I'd be pretty annoyed if someone stuck a gun in my face and drove my workplace into a bridge.
nah not with anyone onboard. just "ghosty it" into the bridge at the last minute
They don't need manpower. Take out the bridge, sink supply ships, shell the road in or manage to advance to the coast (simply holding a key intersection to break the connection would work). Then just wait for the water to run out. It's not a defensible position without the bridge. Where manpower becomes an issue is pushing the Russians out of Eastern Ukraine. Unless the Russians run out of ammo, that's not happening without NATO boots.
> Does Ukraine have the man power to even take it back? Well, Ukraine *does* have the power to deny it to Russia in the sense that it's now unusable as navy base for Russia: they have to put their ships elsewhere. That kind of demonstration holds weight at the negotiation table.
It’ll still be worth a lot to Russia. It gives them good access to the Black Sea. That has economic and security benefits even if Crimea was just a port and an uninhabitable desert. But it also happens to be some pretty premo land as well
# Then destroy Novorossiysk! The big non-Ukrainian Black Sea port in Russia, that is so big, Russia needs Crimea to have access the Black Sea, because Russia could otherwise have no warm water port in the Black Sea besides Novorossiysk, which somehow does not count. It had 18% of the Russian cargo turnover. It's a much more important target than the fucking bridge. Sink the cargo ships between Istanbul and Novorossiysk!
It is also many ruZZian elites favorite vacation spot. They will have to go to north korean beaches...
They love Thailand - we should be leveraging our relationships with Thailand to ban Russians from visiting.
Yeah, good luck with that. They own half of the real estate in popular tourist spots.
Position s 9/10ths. expropriation law in Thailand: https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/special-reports/312580/property-in-thailand-part-3-can-the-government-take-it-away so it _can_ be done with a valid reason and some steps. But they would be shooting themselves in the foot out of tourism money.
Sound like a great reason to pay Thialand a bunch of money and seize Russian owned assets. I 100% agree with you - impossible, but it would definitely hit some oligarchs where it hurts. Lots of more easily accessible Russian assets we should be seizing anyway.
Thailand likes to be neutral in these matters. They need a good relationship with china, and benefit from being on the fence. They would not like being pressured to make enemies of their allies.
US navy just made its underwater drones. Should totally sell one to Ukraine and have them torpedo the fuck out of the bridge.
How about Moscow..
Bomb civilians, use chemical weapons, abduct children, etc. Which is to say, exactly what they’re already doing.
Don't forget.. blow up a dam, kidnap journalist and steal grain.
Don't forget digging trenches in a destroyed nuclear plant's radioactive exclusion zone.
Not exactly a crime that, just, monumentally stupid.
Special operation 2.0
Vodka time .
They will change the name of their invasion from Special Operation to War.
Don't make us tweet it!
Double secret invasion. Twice as many Russian patriots on vacation.
Probably bomb more dog walkers in Odessa
[удалено]
You spelled years wrong
You spelled decades wrong
You spelled never wrong
Double secret probation!
Seems to me Russia has exactly one more card to play: nuclear weapons. And they are bluffing hard w that.
They might war. Cause some real damage to Ukraine. Bomb the capital. Maybe even occupy territory.
Blow up a dam and cause a civilian and environmental disaster?
Lmao they're already using chemical weapons
Yeah how is it gonna get any worse? If they resort to a tactical nuke the United States said that they would intervene.
Oh it won’t just be the United States, that’s for sure.
Missile attacks on civilians most likely
They’ve been doing that the entire time.
chemical and biological weapons in kyiv. Justing saying they can always go deeper even without using nukes. No one is going to do anything additional beyond words. Of course Ukraine will be armed (until trump is elected), but there will be no special response.
Jokes aside, they'll probably blow up another public building with innocent civilians in it. Reddit likes to take their threats lightly, but it's still Russia and they've been killing a shitload of Ukrainian civilians.
Ya? Are they going to gas Ukrainians? Rape, torture and murder them? Begin targeting civilian homes and buildings? Fuck Russian threats
They already double tap missile strikes to kill civilian rescue workers, so I guess they will triple tap them? Fuck Russia.
"I will use our nuke. For god's sake we really gonna nuke you this time. We are not bluffing, we really gonna do it. Maybe"
I love the contrast with the US. Where Russia keeps crying nuke, the US stated clearly that a nuclear strike against Ukraine would cause a large conventional response from the US. There are no threats of retaliatory nuclear strikes, because if the situation calls for a nuclear response, the option still exists, but if it doesn't the US doesn't look weak, because it doesn't have to backpedal*. Nuclear deterrent only works if the conditions are clear and if a threat to use them is dead serious. Running their mount cost Russia the most useful capability of their most expensive weapons system.
Backpedal.
Never make a threat you aren't going to carry out. I have no doubt the US will follow through in any threats it makes. The US doesn't usually make direct threats. They use implied threats. The US will do things like parking a carrier strike group off the coast of a nation and then attempting diplomatic talks. The other nation is well aware that it is there and the implications, so there is no need to saber rattle. It also allows more friendly talks because the talks will be more respectful when one side isn't threatening to attack the other. There is a reason that the US is allied with something like half of all nations, while Russia has no formal allies.
But only if you cross our 11th red line!
Reminds me of this :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToYt5SgGDgI&t=79s
You forgot about 'steal their children.'
Maybe they’ll bomb a kindergarten!? Oh wait…
Worse, steal their sinks along with their toilets.
Russia: Yes we are trying to destroy you but please don't try and hurt us or we'll be really angry.
It's exactly that.
There's no way that bridge survives the summer. Hope they have enough landing ships to supply their Crimean garrison... oh wait.
>There's no way that bridge survives the summer *French to British engineers at MBDA (or vice versa)* "That still only counts as one!"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Nazaire_Raid Load some boom into a big ass ship ram that bitch
Why waste the explosives. Just fill an oil tanker with water for added weight and ram it.
We saw what that container ship did to the Francis Scott Key Bridge.
Ty, I spent 30 minutes reading that whole page. So badass
russia has a land connection to crimea from the weest of the Azov Sea. They have a lot of land secured. The bridge is nice, but not the only way to drive supplies into crimea. that being said... please blow this bridge up
It's a much longer drive though. Yes it won't cut off Crimea completely but it'll put more strain on the supply lines.
The key thing about the bridge is the rail line going across it. Sending tanks and other military vehicles to the front by truck is ridiculously slow and inefficient. Russia's supply lines rely heavily on rail transport.
It is not as much a question whether the bridge can be destroyed, but whether it makes sense. Were the summer push of Ukraine to Azov in 2023 to be successful, the bridge would be a life-and-death question for russia, but it is not at the moment. And the US delaying for 5-6 months had been bad enough that not only Ukraine couldn't hope for a new push in 2024, it had to retreat from some territories, and now the support of 2025 is in question, giving the sexual abusing orange guy still being in the poll lead. There might be better targets for ATACMS and Scalps than a symbolic bridge that will get fixed in 2 months without much disruption. I still think it will be disabled somewhere this year, but it will be a victory for the morale rather than strategic one.
Transport of land supplies via truck is far more inefficient, and such supplies are well within range of Ukraine strike capabilities. It will not solve Russia's issues with Crimean resupply if the bridge goes down.
Intercepting a truck from 100 km is beyond the reasonable efforts. Given there can't be a new push until 2025, that is enough time for russia to expand the railway network, which it had already started some time ago. The toughest battles happen close to Donetsk, occupied from 2014 and which had always had a rail connection to russia for the last 50+ years. It would be funny if Ukraine would keep destroying russian AA systems in Crimea while never striking the bridge, forcing other objects in russia to stay defenseless.
It isn't beyond reasonable efforts at all. It can be done with drones carrying light explosive munitions, and Ukraine has displayed a remarkable reach with such drone attacks. The rail line from Rostov-on-don will also be well within strike range whenever they're able to finish the connection. Currently it only runs through Mariupol. We'll see how easily they can build it up and maintain it over the next year, but it won't be a simple matter in a warzone.
>Currently it only runs through Mariupol. We'll see how easily they can build it up and maintain it over the next year, but it won't be a simple matter in a warzone. Ouch, that sounds like a primary target for logistical strikes once Kerch is eliminated. If you look at the content of the recent US aid package, it's very heavy on ammo and vehicles. If the US military was intelligent (and they can be *very* intelligent when they make the effort) those supplies have already been staged in Germany or Poland. Lead with a massive drone strike, we're talking ~100 heavy lift drones loaded with 20 to 30 kilos of C4 each, follow up with a couple/few HIMARS cluster munitions a week, and that hub is done for. You'd never repair the damage of the leading strike when you have heavy grade cluster munitions dropping out of the sky every day or two (or three, or four, or a few hours apart, who knows? Gotta make it interesting!). You'd have to make the repair crews work at gunpoint, which only ups the casualties when the clouds start speaking submunition. Clearing even one derailed or disabled train from the lines is multiple days of around the clock effort. Then drop a few hundred submunitions into the middle of that effort. Now you're clearing bodies, clearing the equipment brought in to clear the derailed train... it's a compounding logistical and manpower nightmare.
If Ukraine can take it down at low operational cost why wouldn’t they?
>giving the sexual abusing orange guy still being in the poll lead who's currently in court because he ejaculated inside of a porn star then paid her illegally not to tell anyone
Doesn't stop the proponents of "family values" from rooting for him as if he is the 2nd Jesus.
This boggles my mind. Trump is a person of terrible character. Openly terrible. How he somehow is seen as moral is beyond belief for me.
Conservatives don't actually care about morals at all. The bible is a tool to be wielded against those they view as lesser. Whatever the conservative does is good, and moral, and whatever the "other" does is bad and immoral, the bible says so right here! This still holds even if the actions are identical, because it's the person that is moral, not the action itself. Once you realize that all conservatives are unserious people who only care about themselves, they are a lot easier to understand.
To these people the rules of “family values” only apply to women.
I think you’re underestimating the value of the moral victory for Ukraine, or more likely the moral defeat of Russia
The problem with starting with war crimes is it doesn't leave you much room to escalate
This is why wars should start with the shoe-pissing, then escalate to full-on shitting in their garden at midnight. Let the petty stuff work its magic first.
This is Russia's 769th final warning.
But, ohhhh boy!! You do not want to hear the 770th one!
No, final warnings are [China’s trick](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%27s_final_warning). You’re thinking of Russia’s [red lines](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_lines_in_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War).
This is Russia’s 769th last straw
Ukraine did damage the bridge a few times already in last 2 years. Russia always lies, there was no revenge
Putin's gonna poo his pants if they don't listen to him.
Let it join the kursk.
And moskva
The Moskva? Surely you’re joking. There’s no way anything could have happened to the Moskva! It’s the invincible pride of the Russian navy! It carries a priceless Fabergé Egg and a fragment of the True Cross of Christ! It’s the *flagship* of the Black Sea fleet! Putin himself travels on the Moskva when visiting other countries. There’s simply no way that any country could *ever* hurt the Moskva, much less a country with no navy at all! God, that never stops being funny.
> ~~Black Sea fleet~~ Blyat Sea Fleet FTFY
The main character of one Italian novel once said " if every fragment of the Cross scattered around the world were real our Lord and Saviour was probably crucified on a stilt house"
Slava Ukraini!
Like using chemical weapons, bombing hospitals, and stealing children? Oh that’s right, they already have done that.
Russia is the rapist and torturer that cried Wolf
I love it when Russia tells us exactly what they fear most with their threats and warnings. It's like having them plan their downfall.
We (Americans) should just send them boys from Baltimore to sail some container ships under that bridge. Should solve the whole problem.
Special container ship operation. They’ll never expect it
Marlo might fit in too well there. But I’d be fine letting Omar do his thing there.
Snoop could easily take out putin.
Give them the Stringer Bell treatment, send Omar *and* Brother Mouzone
God that would be so funny
Hey now! That wasn't us! That was a non-American vessel with a non-American crew. The bridge was VERY much American, though.
Russia has already done the worst it can possibly do without using nuclear weapons. Its threats mean nothing since they're already at their worst.
"If you dont love me at my worst, then you don't deserve me at my worst, also." - Validamir Monroe
Ukraine faces destruction if they do not destroy the Kerch bridge
Want to know exactly what to do next... do the opposite of what Putin tells you to do.
Putin attacks Ukraine. But throws a bitch fit if Ukraine retaliates lol. Get fucking bent Putin
How DARE Ukraine fight back!!!!! All Russia did was invade their country and bomb their civilians.... And probably executed some civilians.... And.. alegedly gassed Ukrainian troops...etc...etc...
Russia is the sovereign state equivalent of a Karen and has been for the last century at this point.
Don't forget the countless children they abducted, and the various futures they will face wherever they end up.
>alegedly gassed Ukrainian troops Allegedly? They even posted the video. https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/comments/1ciktrm/russian_drone_dropping_a_k51_chloropicrin_granade/
You forgot about the whole rape and torture thing. And abduct children and force them into Russian families and military academy's. Fuck Russia That bridge is going down.
You can strike out the “probably” and “allegedly”; both are well documented now by outside observers, not just by Ukraine.
Bye bridge
What are they gonna do, bomb hospitals, apartment complexes, schools, hospitals, historic sites? GTFOH
That means they scared
You started a war, Ukraine is simply defending itself you dickwads
Bridge go boom boom bye bye
I'm worried Russia might invade Ukraine!
Drop the bridge. Drop that motherfucker with extreme prejudice.
What more can Russia do that Ukrainians haven’t suffered without demonstrating themselves as the most evil group of sinners on this earth? Their threats are meaningless, or they choose go alienate themselves further. PS. I eagerly await the destruction of this bridge.
Not only that, but they know what kind of tyrannical apocalyptic shit awaits them if they do give in. Also known as The Holodomor, which Russia caused * checks notes * because they could.
Once you’ve killed the men, raped the women and stole the children it’s a bit late threatening consequences about a bridge.
Mass rape men and women.. oh wait already done. NM.
Doubt
Still waiting
For realz this time.
More empty threats from the bully
“Blah blah blah” - Russia
You heard it here, they were holding back the whole time!
Medved neeeeeeds vodka.
Ukraine should start hitting the vodka distilleries. Once Russia starts having to ration vodka you know it's going to really hit home with the general population and then they'll stop this madness. Disclaimer, just some guy on reddit. This may or may not be effective strategy against Russia, I have no idea.
I remember reading somewhere a few years ago that the nearest Russia came to riots was when they were considering putting (more?) tax on vodka. If this is true, it would certainly be the way to go!
Destroy it! Russia doesn’t get to invade AND make up the rules. Bad enough they try to call cease fire a couple of times already for their own benefit. Fuck Russia.
More war crimes?!?
Again? You mean attacks the bridge again.
The illegal bridge they're using to supply the invasion of the rest of Ukraine? Get fucked, Pootie
You heard them. Blow the bridge boys
Bust that motherfucking bridge!!!
It sounds like they are asking them to attack the bridge. It's a dare.
Ukraine can do anything to their own bridge. Russia has no say over sovereign Ukrainian territory. Fuck Russia
Russian politicians are like four year olds who have shit their pants but refuse to admit it and who throws a tantrum over the smell.
"Russia promises..." You can stop reading right there.
The only escalation they have that they haven't used is small yield targeted nukes. Other than that, they are just talking out of their ass. Must be kinda sad realizing you've used up all your options to induce fear.
China’s final warning
Where's Baghdad Bob? We need him to draw a line
“We’re going to really fuck you up in this war where we invaded you two years ago if you damage the bridge in the area we stole from you ten years ago!”
weird threat. They're already throwing everything they have at Ukraine, minus nukes.
Stfu Ruzzia. Just get out of Ukraine (then pay for all the stuff you destroyed).
Aren’t they already “devastating” Ukraine? Eat with requests, now?
Sure Jan
Hmmmm. Russia will deliver “devastating revenge” if Ukraine hits Putin’s favorite. I guess things could get worse, so not to laugh this off. But….. hitting the bridge is a military response to RUSSIA INVADING UKRAINE. FAFO By the way: GOP? Or. Dem? Vote wisely.
Blow it up.
Do it.
I really mean it this time… not like the time I said it would takes days last year
What? They've been holding back?
Get fucked Russia
Call their bluff.
Lemme guess. More missile volleys into Kiev and Odessa to blow up some schools or hospitals or something...
Thanks for letting us know which targets matter most to you, I guess
Do it Ukraine, destroy their bridge , it's illegal anyway
Makes one wonder if helping them in WWII against the Germans was a big mistake.
No threats will really work on Ukraine now... How silly.
Fuck em, blow their shit up.
Russia is already at war with Ukraine though..
Does Russian foreign policy use any tool other than threats?
Big mouth Russians at it again. When will they learn? This bridge is will be attacked until it crumbles and it's only a matter of time before that happens. Revenge? OK.
Sounds like their next move should be to destroy the Crimean bridge.
The Ukrainians should just cut loose a container ship and let it float into the bridge. It worked in Baltimore. /s